Re: PAL's and GAL's

[Jim Stewart]

Paul Burke wrote:
> John Larkin wrote:
>
> > I'm currently doing a PEEL 22CV10 design 
>
>
> They are beautiful devices, worlds better than GALs. A rich choice of 
> feedback (you can configure an embedded flipflop, and use the associated 
> pin as an input) and the clock is fed into the product matrix. Sad that 
> they never really caught on, and I'm not sure that anyone else ever made 
> them. Though ICT did irritate me badly by changing the programming 
> algorithm just after the manufacturer of my programmer stopped 
> supporting that model.

Another PEEL lover.  I thought I was alone
in the world.  Very nice devices and never
had a lick of trouble with them.