Re: PAL's and GAL's

Subject:	Re: PAL's and GAL's
From:	"Joel Kolstad"
Date:	Thu, 30 Mar 2006 12:25:38 -0800
Newsgroups:	sci.electronics.basics, comp.arch.embedded, sci.electronics.design

"Jonathan Kirwan" <jkirwan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
news:nceo229m3lj0qi99l96ahr52jj0oduh0a6@xxxxxxxxxx
> So [someone else is] arguing hard against the use of any graphical
> schematic entry method for the students.  But the instructor has
> already said this is desirable for his use.


I'm willing to go with
> that assurance.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: PAL's and GAL's, (continued) Re: PAL's and GAL's, Deefoo Re: PAL's and GAL's, bill . sloman Re: PAL's and GAL's, Ken Smith Re: PAL's and GAL's, John Larkin Re: PAL's and GAL's, Paul Burke Re: PAL's and GAL's, Jim Stewart Re: PAL's and GAL's, John Larkin Re: PAL's and GAL's, Jonathan Kirwan Re: PAL's and GAL's, Jim Granville Re: PAL's and GAL's, Jonathan Kirwan Re: PAL's and GAL's, Joel Kolstad <= Re: PAL's and GAL's, Jonathan Kirwan Re: PAL's and GAL's, Joel Kolstad Re: PAL's and GAL's, Jim Granville Re: PAL's and GAL's, samiam

Previous by Date:	Re: PAL's and GAL's, Jonathan Kirwan
Next by Date:	Re: is it possible? 1600W step-down transformer so tiny!, Slurp
Previous by Thread:	Re: PAL's and GAL's, Jonathan Kirwan
Next by Thread:	Re: PAL's and GAL's, Jonathan Kirwan
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]