|
|
On 28 Jul, 15:12, Raghar <Ragha...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Jul 24, 1:11 pm, Talebun <pmpark...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 24 Jul, 00:21, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
>
> > > On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:42:51 -0700 (PDT), Ian Parker
> > > <ianpark...@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > >On 23 Jul, 05:08, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
> > > >> On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:13:02 -0700 (PDT), PD
> > > >> <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >> >On Jul 22, 5:59 pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
> > > >> >> On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:31:46 -0700 (PDT), PD
> > > >> >> <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >> >> >"Henry", as a big of tactical advice, if you're going to mount a
> > > >> >> >disinformation campaign, it's extremely important to do so from a
> > > >> >> >position of credibility. Since you are a known and storied
> > > >> >> >pathological liar, and since you have freely admitted that you have
> > > >> >> >read nothing which you attempt to discredit, and have been shown
> > > >> >> >to be
> > > >> >> >generally incompetent in the subject innumerable times, you may
> > > >> >> >find
> > > >> >> >your position to be less than ideal for the attempt.
>
> > > >> >> Draper, your defence has sunk to such a low level that your only
> > > >> >> remaining
> > > >> >> argument is to persistently call me a liar.
>
> > > >> >Because you are. There's no point in making an argument with someone
> > > >> >who is completely uninterested in truth.
> > > >> >There is no point in making
> > > >> >an argument to a religious zealot. There is no point in making an
> > > >> >argument to a shameless liar who has not a single care for the
> > > >> >integrity of what he says.
>
> > > >> Well I had better stop wasting time arguing with one then.
>
> > > >> >An argument is a worthwhile strategy for someone who would be
> > > >> >embarrassed to insist the sky is pink after it is made plain that's an
> > > >> >incorrect statement. But you are wholly incapable of being embarrassed
> > > >> >-- a trait that is not uncommon among those who have no personal
> > > >> >dignity remaining.
>
> > > >> >> Why don't you behave like a man and
> > > >> >> admit defeat.
> > > >> >> No matter what you say or think, there is no doubt that Einsteinian
> > > >> >> relativity
> > > >> >> is now known to be pure nonsense from start to finish.
>
> > > >> >See? There's another lie. You say it is now known. By whom? Names,
> > > >> >please.
>
> > > >> >> >PD
>
> > > >> >> Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>
> > > >> >> All religion involves selling a nonexistant product to gullible
> > > >> >> unfortunates. Einstein cleverly exploited this principle with his
> > > >> >> second postulate.
>
> > > >> Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>
> > > >> All religion involves selling a nonexistant product to gullible fools.
> > > >> Einstein cleverly exploited this principle with his second postulate.-
> > > >> Hide quoted text -
>
> > > >Propose an alternative theory. It has to be one though that fits the
> > > >facts.
>
> > > All the facts clearly point to light being ballistic in pure vacuum..
|
|