|
|
On 28 Jul, 01:15, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:06:08 -0700 (PDT), PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >On Jul 25, 5:29 pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
> >> On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:33:12 GMT, Sam Wormley <sworml...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >Dr. Henri Wilson wrote:
>
> >> >> Anti-Einstein articles will never be published in establishment run
> >> >> journals
> >> >> for the simple reason that too many eminent reputations would be
> >> >> destroyed as
> >> >> the truth emerged.
>
> >> > Especially when the empirical data shows the articles
> >> > to be without merit.
>
> >> All experimental evidence points to light being 100% ballistic in a pure
> >> vacuum.
>
> >Well, let's see...
> >Since you would claim that light being in a pure vacuum is
> >unobservable, because the fields in light destroy the vacuum, then
> >perhaps a more accurate rendition of your clumsily constructed cipher
> >is:
> >All experimental evidence is consistent with light being 100%
> >ballistic in a pure vacuum, though there is no experimental evidence
> >that directly tests light being ballistic in a pure vacuum (because
> >all observations don't deal with light in a pure vacuum). Moreover,
> >all experimental evidence points to light being not only 100%
> >ballistic but steadily decelerating in Neverland.
>
> It appears you will forever remain deluded, Diaper.
> Light from variable stars travels through empty space. ('empty' means 'below
> the WDT (Wilson Density Threshold)).
>
> Variable star virtually prove that BaTh is correct.
>
> >PD
>
> >> Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>
> >> All religion involves selling a nonexistant product to gullible fools.
> >> Einstein cleverly exploited this principle with his second postulate.
>
> Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>
> All religion involves selling a nonexistant product to gullible fools.
> Einstein cleverly exploited this principle with his second postulate.- Hide
> quoted text -
>
Well I think what you are saying comes pretty damn close to a
religion.
C'mon why does light slow down after it has left the source? How long
does it take? What are the mechanisms?
- Ian Parker
|
|