|
|
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:06:08 -0700 (PDT), PD <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Jul 25, 5:29 pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:33:12 GMT, Sam Wormley <sworml...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >Dr. Henri Wilson wrote:
>>
>> >> Anti-Einstein articles will never be published in establishment run
>> >> journals
>> >> for the simple reason that too many eminent reputations would be
>> >> destroyed as
>> >> the truth emerged.
>>
>> > Especially when the empirical data shows the articles
>> > to be without merit.
>>
>> All experimental evidence points to light being 100% ballistic in a pure
>> vacuum.
>
>Well, let's see...
>Since you would claim that light being in a pure vacuum is
>unobservable, because the fields in light destroy the vacuum, then
>perhaps a more accurate rendition of your clumsily constructed cipher
>is:
>All experimental evidence is consistent with light being 100%
>ballistic in a pure vacuum, though there is no experimental evidence
>that directly tests light being ballistic in a pure vacuum (because
>all observations don't deal with light in a pure vacuum). Moreover,
>all experimental evidence points to light being not only 100%
>ballistic but steadily decelerating in Neverland.
It appears you will forever remain deluded, Diaper.
Light from variable stars travels through empty space. ('empty' means 'below
the WDT (Wilson Density Threshold)).
Variable star virtually prove that BaTh is correct.
>PD
>
>>
>> Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>>
>> All religion involves selling a nonexistant product to gullible fools.
>> Einstein cleverly exploited this principle with his second postulate.
Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
All religion involves selling a nonexistant product to gullible fools. Einstein
cleverly exploited this principle with his second postulate.
|
|