|
|
On Jul 27, 6:35 am, ukastronomy <martin_piers_nichol...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Sorry Pentcho but you are still posting to the wrong place if you
> really want to influence scientific thought!
>
> The people here are not the people you need to convince and the danger
> is that you are seen as obsessed with the matter. I really don't
> understand why you feel posting similar material again and again
> advances, rather than damages, your cause?
>
> Please share your motivation with the group.
>
> Martin Nicholson
> Daventry, UK
You don't understand and unfortunately I cannot help you - pehaps your
early education or your genes are to blame. But your cleverer brothers
now understand everything and react in the only reasonable way:
http://www.edge.org/q2008/q08_5.html
John Baez: "On the one hand we have the Standard Model, which tries to
explain all the forces except gravity, and takes quantum mechanics
into account. On the other hand we have General Relativity, which
tries to explain gravity, and does not take quantum mechanics into
account. Both theories seem to be more or less on the right track —
but until we somehow fit them together, or completely discard one or
both, our picture of the world will be deeply schizophrenic.....I
realized I didn't have enough confidence in either theory to engage in
these heated debates. I also realized that there were other questions
to work on: questions where I could actually tell when I was on the
right track, questions where researchers cooperate more and fight
less. So, I eventually decided to quit working on quantum gravity."
Pentcho Valev
pvalev@xxxxxxxxx
|
|