| Subject: | Re: Pentcho Valev - why not peer reviewed publication? |
|---|---|
| From: | HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) |
| Date: | Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:29:56 GMT |
| Newsgroups: | sci.astro, sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, fr.sci.physique, fr.sci.astrophysique |
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:33:12 GMT, Sam Wormley <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Dr. Henri Wilson wrote: > >> >> Anti-Einstein articles will never be published in establishment run journals >> for the simple reason that too many eminent reputations would be destroyed >> as >> the truth emerged. > > Especially when the empirical data shows the articles > to be without merit. All experimental evidence points to light being 100% ballistic in a pure vacuum. Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm All religion involves selling a nonexistant product to gullible fools. Einstein cleverly exploited this principle with his second postulate. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Pentcho Valev - why not peer reviewed publication?, Sam Wormley |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Pentcho Valev - why not peer reviewed publication?, Pentcho Valev |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Pentcho Valev - why not peer reviewed publication?, Sam Wormley |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Pentcho Valev - why not peer reviewed publication?, PD |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |