sci.astro
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Pentcho Valev - why not peer reviewed publication?

Subject: Re: Pentcho Valev - why not peer reviewed publication?
From: HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson)
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:29:56 GMT
Newsgroups: sci.astro, sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, fr.sci.physique, fr.sci.astrophysique

On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:33:12 GMT, Sam Wormley <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Dr. Henri Wilson wrote:
>
>> 
>> Anti-Einstein articles will never be published in establishment run journals
>> for the simple reason that too many eminent reputations would  be destroyed 
>> as
>> the truth emerged. 
>
>   Especially when the empirical data shows the articles
>   to be without merit.

All experimental evidence points to light being 100% ballistic in a pure
vacuum.



Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

All religion involves selling a nonexistant product to gullible fools. Einstein 
cleverly exploited this principle with his second postulate.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>