sci.astro
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
Google
 
<prev [Thread] next>

Re: Pentcho Valev - why not peer reviewed publication?

from [Sam Wormley]
Subject: Re: Pentcho Valev - why not peer reviewed publication?
From: Sam Wormley <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:33:12 GMT
Newsgroups: sci.astro, sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, fr.sci.physique, fr.sci.astrophysique 


Dr. Henri Wilson wrote:



Anti-Einstein articles will never be published in establishment run journals
for the simple reason that too many eminent reputations would  be destroyed as
the truth emerged. 

  Especially when the empirical data shows the articles
  to be without merit.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Pentcho Valev - why not peer reviewed publication?, Ian Parker
Next by Date:  Re: Pentcho Valev - why not peer reviewed publication?, Dr. Henri Wilson
Previous by Thread:  Re: Pentcho Valev - why not peer reviewed publication?, Dr. Henri Wilson
Next by Thread:  Re: Pentcho Valev - why not peer reviewed publication?, Dr. Henri Wilson
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]