|
|
On 25 Jul, 10:41, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 05:29:10 GMT, Sam Wormley <sworml...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >Dr. Henri Wilson wrote:
>
> >> Light from orbiting stars initially leaves the source at c+vsint/T wrt
> >> Earth.
>
> > <laughing>
>
> All right, I could have included another term u, denoting the speed of the
> binary barycentre wrt earth. I usually leave that out because it is obvious
> and
> doesn't affect brightness curves..
>
> Do you still find this amusing, Wormey?...or do you think that all starlight
> is
> magically adjusted by the fairies to travel towards little planet Earth at
> precisely c?
>
> I might remind you that even Einstein accepted the notion of 'approaching
> speed' being other than c, as seen by a third observer. It is this approaching
> speed that creates brightness curves.
>
> Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>
> All religion involves selling a nonexistant product to gullible fools.
> Einstein cleverly exploited this principle with his second postulate.
How does it know where the barycenter is. This seems very like :
http://discaircraft.greyfalcon.us/
One you get beyond the glam pusses and Nazi propaganda there are some
very interesting articles.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Piecraft/Jenseitsflugmaschine From
Wikipaedia
http://discaircraft.greyfalcon.us/The%20Vril%20Discs.htm Aldebaron
(khayyid?)
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ufo_aleman/esp_ufoaleman_6.htm
2000+km/h endurance 5½ hr was absolutely absurd.
Don't you think Freya looks nice. Worth it for a little soft porn.
Look, light "sees" the physical environment round it. Its properties
do not depend on source or emitter. It IS reminiscent of Aldebaran.
BTW - Are you "khayyid"or "mis khayyid"? Do you know what it means?
Why the Nazis should choose a red giant is beyond my comprehension. If
there ever was a planet supporting life it has long ceased to. The
Earth will eventually be roasted.
I don't think you believe half the things you post. I don't think Tom
Potter does either. He blames the Jews for the Iraq war while it is
perfectly clear that the war was caused by a gentile cabal WHO DID NOT
RESPECT TRAINED INTELLIGENCE.
You would not think that Arabic and relativity were linked. They are,
by this lack of respect for trained intelligence. This leads me onto
another point.
The Nazis produced disc aircraft. The belief was that the aircraft was
not aerodynamic it was linked to Aldebaran. If you state, at once,
that the craft is aerodynamic you have a lot of theory to draw upon.
There was where the waste occurred and where all the lying started.
The fact of the matter was that the CIA did not consult reputable
Physicists or Aerodynamicists. If they had they might not have made
such a hash of things.
Is there anything in vortex VTOL? Yes and no. I believe it would be
possible with modern technology to construct a vortex aircraft that
would have advantages over existing aircraft. BUT I think that anyone
starting out would be well advised to disregard the literature and
start from scratch. A 3GB RAM 2GHz computer costs < $1,000. This can
do quite a reasonable mesh for you. You would be well advised to run
hydrocode, test controllability at speed, transition to conventional
fixed wing BEFORE you start to bend metal.
I feel too that lies feed on lies. I think it would be impossible to
propose a vortex aircraft seriously, largely because of all the hype
and lies. That is of course in the US. There is still a danger that
someone who understands the Navier Stokes equation and v^2/r will beat
the US to it.
Do you by any chance work on antigravity?
http://www.consortiumnews.com/archive/story41.html The setting up of
the CIA links
http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology/anti_grav_010909.html
US Research into antigravity
http://anthonyhmura.blogspot.com/2008/03/witch-hunts-of-mccarthy-and-fagan.html
More Nazi conspiracy theories
http://www.westga.edu/~hgoodson/The%20Cold%20War.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird CIA activities kept
secret from congress
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/cold.war/kbank/profiles/mccarthy/
By all accounts research is STILL going on. Anyone with any knowledge
of Physics would demand that the whole project should be shelved and a
new project, with different people, started - this time on firm
aerodynamic principles.
- Ian Parker
|
|