|
|
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:13:02 -0700 (PDT), PD <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Jul 22, 5:59 pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:31:46 -0700 (PDT), PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> >On Jul 21, 5:51 pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 08:17:00 -0700 (PDT), PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >That may be the case, but the acceptance of relativity does not hinge
>> >> >on the MMX. The MMX *may* have offered a peek that inspired the guess
>> >> >that Einstein made (though that isn't historically clear either), but
>> >> >what sealed relativity versus the emission theory of light are two
>> >> >happenstances that had nothing to do with the MMX.
>> >> >1. A number of other experimental consequences that were predicted by
>> >> >SR that turned out to be right.
>>
>> >> there are none.
>>
>> >> >2. A number of experimental consequences that were predicted by the
>> >> >emission theory of light that turned out to be wrong.
>>
>> >> They have all been shown to be wrong.
>>
>> >> >The fact that the MMX alone cannot discriminate between the two
>> >> >theories is irrelevant.
>>
>> >> The MMX is just one of many experiments that supports BaTh.
>>
>> >"Henry", as a big of tactical advice, if you're going to mount a
>> >disinformation campaign, it's extremely important to do so from a
>> >position of credibility. Since you are a known and storied
>> >pathological liar, and since you have freely admitted that you have
>> >read nothing which you attempt to discredit, and have been shown to be
>> >generally incompetent in the subject innumerable times, you may find
>> >your position to be less than ideal for the attempt.
>>
>> Draper, your defence has sunk to such a low level that your only remaining
>> argument is to persistently call me a liar.
>
>Because you are. There's no point in making an argument with someone
>who is completely uninterested in truth.
>There is no point in making
>an argument to a religious zealot. There is no point in making an
>argument to a shameless liar who has not a single care for the
>integrity of what he says.
Well I had better stop wasting time arguing with one then.
>
>An argument is a worthwhile strategy for someone who would be
>embarrassed to insist the sky is pink after it is made plain that's an
>incorrect statement. But you are wholly incapable of being embarrassed
>-- a trait that is not uncommon among those who have no personal
>dignity remaining.
>
>> Why don't you behave like a man and
>> admit defeat.
>> No matter what you say or think, there is no doubt that Einsteinian
>> relativity
>> is now known to be pure nonsense from start to finish.
>
>See? There's another lie. You say it is now known. By whom? Names,
>please.
>
>>
>> >PD
>>
>> Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>>
>> All religion involves selling a nonexistant product to gullible
>> unfortunates. Einstein cleverly exploited this principle with his second
>> postulate.
Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
All religion involves selling a nonexistant product to gullible fools. Einstein
cleverly exploited this principle with his second postulate.
|
|