|
|
On Jul 21, 5:51 pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 08:17:00 -0700 (PDT), PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> >That may be the case, but the acceptance of relativity does not hinge
> >on the MMX. The MMX *may* have offered a peek that inspired the guess
> >that Einstein made (though that isn't historically clear either), but
> >what sealed relativity versus the emission theory of light are two
> >happenstances that had nothing to do with the MMX.
> >1. A number of other experimental consequences that were predicted by
> >SR that turned out to be right.
>
> there are none.
>
> >2. A number of experimental consequences that were predicted by the
> >emission theory of light that turned out to be wrong.
>
> They have all been shown to be wrong.
>
> >The fact that the MMX alone cannot discriminate between the two
> >theories is irrelevant.
>
> The MMX is just one of many experiments that supports BaTh.
>
"Henry", as a big of tactical advice, if you're going to mount a
disinformation campaign, it's extremely important to do so from a
position of credibility. Since you are a known and storied
pathological liar, and since you have freely admitted that you have
read nothing which you attempt to discredit, and have been shown to be
generally incompetent in the subject innumerable times, you may find
your position to be less than ideal for the attempt.
PD
|
|