Re: Pentcho Valev - why not peer reviewed publication?

[jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@aol>]

Pentcho Valev wrote:
> On Jul 16, 4:53 pm, ukastronomy <martin_piers_nichol...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote in sci.astro:
> > PentchoValev - why not peer reviewed publication?"
> >
> > Instead of endlessly pumping out the same material to people in this
> > group who don't seem interested or convinced by what you write why not
> > just prepare an article for peer reviewed publication.
> >
> > If the evidence is as overwhelming as you would have us believe the
> > well known scientific journals would jump at the opportunity to
> > publish your work.
> >
> > Martin Nicholson
> > Daventry, England
>
> They did jump but for different reasons. Philip Ball, the editor of
> Nature, even found it suitable to convert so much jumping into money
> and wrote a book about me:
>
> http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sun-Moon-Corrupted-Philip-Ball/dp/1846271088
> "The Sun and Moon Corrupted" by Philip Ball
>
> I am trying to counteract but without much success:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thread/66743bacba47371c?
>
> So my countless attempts to publish in "peer-reviewed" journals
> brought calamity on me and fortune on Philip Ball. Why should I
> continue?

Perhaps you should try to publish in the Congressional Record.

/BAH