Re: Pentcho Valev - why not peer reviewed publication?

[Pentcho Valev <pvalev@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jul 16, 4:53 pm, ukastronomy <martin_piers_nichol...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote in sci.astro:
> PentchoValev - why not peer reviewed publication?"
>
> Instead of endlessly pumping out the same material to people in this
> group who don't seem interested or convinced by what you write why not
> just prepare an article for peer reviewed publication.
>
> If the evidence is as overwhelming as you would have us believe the
> well known scientific journals would jump at the opportunity to
> publish your work.
>
> Martin Nicholson
> Daventry, England

They did jump but for different reasons. Philip Ball, the editor of
Nature, even found it suitable to convert so much jumping into money
and wrote a book about me:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sun-Moon-Corrupted-Philip-Ball/dp/1846271088
"The Sun and Moon Corrupted" by Philip Ball

I am trying to counteract but without much success:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thread/66743bacba47371c?

So my countless attempts to publish in "peer-reviewed" journals
brought calamity on me and fortune on Philip Ball. Why should I
continue?

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@xxxxxxxxx