| Subject: | Re: Turbo Scram |
|---|---|
| From: | "Tom Sanderson" |
| Date: | Thu, 22 Jun 2006 15:00:03 GMT |
| Newsgroups: | sci.astro, sci.space.policy, sci.physics, sci.mech.fluids, sci.engr.mech |
Bret Cahill" <BretCahill@xxxxxxx> wrote: > What about a turbo fan where the fan and duct ass. pops off at a > certain speed? That would be bruttally complex. Better to just jettison the whole engine and switch to a turbojet, if that's what you really want to do. Engine weight is a relatively small percentage of overall weight for most airframes. > The propulsion equivalent of a gear box. Lots of aircraft have gearboxes in the drivetrain...nothing new there. Tom. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Cassini Honors Paul McCartney on his 64th Birthday, Rising-Star |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: NASA's Chandra Solves Black Hole Paradox, Rising-Star |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Turbo Scram, Henry Spencer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Turbo Scram, Ken S. Tucker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |