| Subject: | Re: Turbo Scram |
|---|---|
| From: | "Tom Sanderson" |
| Date: | Thu, 22 Jun 2006 15:13:57 GMT |
| Newsgroups: | sci.astro, sci.space.policy, sci.physics, sci.mech.fluids, sci.engr.mech |
"Bret Cahill" <BretCahill@xxxxxxx> wrote: > What I don't understand is why they were never able to control the > Harrier and other vertical takeoff planes better. It seems that's one > problem where computer controls easily could handle any instability. The Harrier is a really old design...computer control of unstable aircraft has come a long way since it was first developed. > It should be as safe as any plane. I don't think we'll ever get that far...a VTOL aircraft is, almost by necessity, dynamically unstable. Failure of the control system will kill it. Not true for most aircraft. Tom. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: NASA's Chandra Solves Black Hole Paradox, Rising-Star |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Turbo Scram, Bret Cahill |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Turbo Scram, Bret Cahill |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Turbo Scram, Jeff Findley |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |