sci.astro
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 'black holes' vs HURRICANES

Subject: Re: 'black holes' vs HURRICANES
From: Saul Levy
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:45:17 -0700
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Now you're pretending to be a weatherman?  What a joke!

Saul Levy


On 18 Apr 2006 15:05:24 -0700, rem460@xxxxxxx wrote:

>3>
>                        "Black Holes" VS. HURRICANES
>
>               Using the repaired Hubble Space Telescope,
>          astronomers have been observing vortices of high-speed
>          gases at the centers of some nearby galaxies.
>
>               The astrophysicists ASSUME that these high-speed
>          gases are orbiting around or spiraling into a
>          significant mass at the vortex center.  So they eagerly
>          pull out their calculators and compute the ASSUMED mass
>          to be equivalent to the mass of MILLIONS of Suns.  They
>          then declare this to be "PROOF" of a "black hole" at the
>          center of each galaxy.
>
>               But the ASSUMPTION of a large mass at the center of
>          each vortex of high-speed gases is ERRONEOUS.
>
>               Astro photographs of spiral galaxies look a lot
>          like satellite photographs of HURRICANES.  How much mass
>          is at the center of a hurricane?  Not much!  The
>          pressure and density inside the eye of a hurricane are
>          MUCH LESS than they are outside the eye.
>
>               Likewise, the pressure and density inside a
>          moderately strong TORNADO are typically about HALF of
>          what they are outside of it.
>
>               What you REALLY have at the center of each galaxy
>          is NOT a "black hole", but instead the EYE of some kind
>          of cosmic HURRICANE.
>
>               "Black holes" DO NOT EXIST.  They are just
>          MATHEMATICAL FANTASIES resulting from ERRONEOUS
>          assumptions or theories about the life cycles of stars
>          and how they generate energy.
>
>
>               The results of scientific observation and
>          experiment are at least 90% INTERPRETATION.  Whenever
>          the interpretation is based on ERRONEOUS ASSUMPTIONS,
>          then the results and conclusions will ALSO be ERRONEOUS.
>
>
>               A WEALTH of Information about the comprehensive
>          GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the Physical Universe
>          developed by the late Physicist Dewey B. Larson can now
>          be found at the web site
>          http://www.rsystem.org/isus/index.htm or /dbl/index.htm
>          .
>
>                               Robert E. McElwaine
>                               B.S., Physics and Astronomy, UW-EC
>                        http://members.aol.com/rem547 PLUS
>                        http://members.aol.com/rem460
>                        Preserve BOTH on CD-R and PRINT-OUTS
>
>          P.S.: PASS IT ON !
>
>
>"EVERYTHING you know is WRONG."
>"The Truth IS STRANGER than fiction."
>"The Truth is ALWAYS the FIRST CASUALTY OF WAR."
>"OFFICIAL LIES are ALWAYS the BIGGEST LIES OF ALL."
>"The more things change, the more they STAY THE SAME."

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>