[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Weirder election than Battlestar Galactica's

Subject: Re: Weirder election than Battlestar Galactica's
From: "deowll"
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 23:27:54 -0600
Newsgroups: sci.astro, sci.astro.amateur, sci.physics, sci.skeptic, sci.archaeology
"Robert Weldon" <rweldon.spamblock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
> "Anonymous" <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in message 
> news:AAUY1JZY38799.075162037@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> On Wed 22 Mar 2006, spam@xxxxxxx (Bob) wrote:
>>  >On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:12:42 GMT, The Nuclear Marine
>>  ><Nuke-Marine@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>  >><snippity>
>>  >
>>  >-crap snipped
> Give it up you loon, the landing were real.  It would be harder to fake 
> them than it would have been to do it for real.
Exactly. It is very hard to fake when other governments are free to watch 
and listen in and they did. If the British, French, and Soviets didn't think 
it was a fake there's a good reason. They had the entire thing under 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>