sci.astro
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Weirder election than Battlestar Galactica's

Subject: Re: Weirder election than Battlestar Galactica's
From: "deowll"
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 23:27:54 -0600
Newsgroups: sci.astro, sci.astro.amateur, sci.physics, sci.skeptic, sci.archaeology
"Robert Weldon" <rweldon.spamblock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
news:uGzUf.173121$sa3.153515@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Anonymous" <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in message 
> news:AAUY1JZY38799.075162037@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> On Wed 22 Mar 2006, spam@xxxxxxx (Bob) wrote:
>>  >On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:12:42 GMT, The Nuclear Marine
>>  ><Nuke-Marine@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>  >><snippity>
>>  >
>>  >-crap snipped
>
> Give it up you loon, the landing were real.  It would be harder to fake 
> them than it would have been to do it for real.
>
Exactly. It is very hard to fake when other governments are free to watch 
and listen in and they did. If the British, French, and Soviets didn't think 
it was a fake there's a good reason. They had the entire thing under 
observation. 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>