[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Teaching the white hole theory in galactic nucleus

Subject: Re: Teaching the white hole theory in galactic nucleus
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:21:37 -0500
Newsgroups: sci.astro, alt.astronomy,, alt.usenet.kooks, alt.alien.visitors
Art Deco wrote:

> Monkey Boy <vgorilla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 22:43:44 -0700, Art Deco <art_deco@xxxxxxxxx>
>>wrote in in message
>>> >Tomorrow I may follow up with a proof for this theory.
>>> I won't be holding my breath.
>>"Proof", in the sense of "saucerhead ga-ga word salad".
> Prediction confirmed, with a pinch of Perplex conspiracies tossed in:
> References:
>    <1142527854.109748.239020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>    <1142528977.092558.293040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>    <1142529620.308979.268410@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>    <1142529925.128851.295310@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>    <1142531126.527064.111870@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>    <1142531392.042623.120620@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>    <1142533776.610720.203360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>    <1142535028.281729.176320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>    <1142535115.633209.46360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>    <1142538849.382645.76430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>    <1142541454.396623.325970@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>    <1142541596.637058.12040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>    <1142543575.526668.158020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>    <1142543687.516194.104340@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>    <1142543742.830137.181810@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

so is it true that you only follow idiots around?  if so, we have a lot in

Roberta "Foxymopjockeychickenwrist" Wolfe
        "The talk of the sekret AUK
        off-newsgroup listserves!"      

>>>>> Hmmmmmm. Is this the Mop Jockey or Alexa?

>>>> Moppy.

>>>Are you sure? It had an Alexa/babaloonie addy (one or the other, I
>>>forget which now)...

>> mop jockey started the "Fart Deco" froggery, which was then adopted by
>> the oh_brutha20002 sockpuppet machine/fanboi.  "FArt Deco" is/was
>> oh_brutha.

> Right, right...I still contend, however, that Alexa is the most likely
> candidate for the wearer of the oh_brutha/babaloonie sock, simply because
> the style resembles hers quite closely (IMO), posting through Google while
> also using a newsreader (Agent 2.0) is easy enough, and oh_brutha seems to
> be going after some of Alexa's favourite targets with much the same
> attitude as Plus, of course, she [isn't] happy if
> she isn't socking-up all the time...              

"Yes, Virginia. There is a bigger loser than the Mop Jockey." -> Kevin Fries
aka: Cujo DeSockpuppet                         

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>