sci.astro
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment

Subject: Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment
From: "Hexenmeister"
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 05:13:21 GMT
Newsgroups: sci.astro, sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
"jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx" <jgreen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
news:1143604956.061673.291770@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Hexenmeister wrote:
| > "Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
| > news:ftjh22dj0sq29o11dh58k9141i26ef589h@xxxxxxxxxx
| > | On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:15:03 GMT, "Hexenmeister" 
<vanquish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
| > wrote:
| > |
| > | >
| > | >"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
| > | >news:qsmg22d8m1do0d0u9g135kqng71dkl71il@xxxxxxxxxx
| > | >| On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 07:43:56 GMT, "Hexenmeister"
| > <vanquish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
| > | >wrote:
| > |
| > | >|
| > | >| It is in any one frame A. All light produced in that frame moves at 
c
| > in
| > | >that
| > | >| frame.
| > | >| If it is reflected from a mirror at rest in that frame, the 
reflected
| > | >speed
| > | >| will also be c in that frame....so TWLS = OWLS = c.
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >Wrong.  If it is reflected it changes direction, so -c.
| > | >  OWLS = c, TWLS = c-c =0
| > | >Even a kid knows about negative numbers.
| > | >
| > | >| Even you should be able to work that out. It is terribly obvious
| > really.
| > | >
| > | >You are  ing insane if you think you can two ways.
| > |
| > | With mirrors, D+ (-D) = 2D
| > |
| > | ...but radio engineers never learnt optics..
| >
| > Sheepshaggers never learned D+ (-D) = 0
|
| Learn some geography! Those are New Zealanders!


The original sheepshaggers were from South Wales.
New South Wales is not in New Zealand. Wilson is a
sheepshagger. Learn some geography!

| .........and if YOU understood the mixing of signage for magnitude AND
| direction
| is crapola, YOU would understand how the Lorentz contractions were
| "conjured"

I do.
   http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Smart/Smart.htm

Professor Androcles
29030612

| Jim G
| c'=c+v
| 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>