| Subject: | Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment |
|---|---|
| From: | "Jeff Root" |
| Date: | 19 Mar 2006 00:43:26 -0800 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.astro, sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
Jim Greenfield replied to Jeff Root: >> I don't understand........ (snip) > > That sums you nicely You still haven't answered my question, Jim. If you won't accept the bet, then at least explain to me why you won't accept it. In the worst case, all you stand to lose is a dollar, an envelope, and postage-- or just a postcard and postage, if you choose. If your original statement accurately reported what The Advertiser said, I will pay you $10,000. -- Jeff, in Minneapolis |
| Previous by Date: | Re: MESSENGER Lines Up for Venus Flyby, Brad Guth |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, George Dishman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, Henri Wilson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |