sci.astro
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment

Subject: Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment
From: "Hexenmeister"
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:28:56 GMT
Newsgroups: sci.astro, sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
"Jeff Root" <jeff5@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
news:1143202191.835306.129460@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Jim Greenfield replied to George Dishman:
|
| > There has been a corruption of my posts.
|
| This is the post in question:
|
| http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci.astro/msg/16f820d2c0131575
|
| > I am positive that it was YOU who suggested the stop/start.
|
| It was your post (link above) which prompted me to start
| making the animation.  Specifically, these lines:
|
| > Get a fast rifleman; have him fire at target while
| > stationary, run quickly forward a few yards, stop and
| > fire again--------repeat (he is a machine gun with the
| > bullets fired when stationary.
| > Will the observer at target note any effect to
| > differentiate between that rifleman staying in the
| > same place?????????
| > (This clearly demonstrates that it is the MOTION of
| > the gun at instant of firing which causes increased
| > frequency/bullet velocity at target)
|
| Those lines first appeared in your post.

Yes. Greenfield did not anticipate you  ING LYING
by saying the muzzle velocity was 8 ppf.
60 pixels separation for rifleman 3, 180 pixels per frame
for rifleman (2).
You are a cunt. Shut the   up.
Androcles.




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>