| Subject: | Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment |
|---|---|
| From: | "George Dishman" |
| Date: | 24 Mar 2006 03:40:22 -0800 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.astro, sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: ... > > Get this straight: > > I claim (1) vs (4) are the cause of doppler for the bullets. > > George and Jeff claim it is (1) vs (4) > > Jeez I hate that! Another bloody typo! > (4) should read (3) for you, oK ? No problem, I knew what you meant anyway but it is still inaccurate, I claim that Doppler shift _occurs_ in both (3) and (4) but there are two possible _causes_ in (4), only one of which also applies in (3). See my other reply for more detail. George |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Long cables to power arcjet rockets to orbit?, Robert Clark |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, George Dishman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, Jeff Root |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |