sci.astro
[Top] [All Lists]

## Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment

 Subject: Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment "Hexenmeister" Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:15:03 GMT sci.astro, sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
 ```"Henri Wilson" wrote in message news:[email protected]/* */ | On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 07:43:56 GMT, "Hexenmeister" <[email protected]/* */> wrote: | | > | >"Henri Wilson" wrote in message | >news:[email protected]/* */ | >| On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:25:09 GMT, "Hexenmeister" <[email protected]/* */> | >wrote: | | >| Wilson agrees with Ritz..... who effectively said that in any one frame, | >TWLS = | >| OWLS = c. | > | >Don't give me that "effectively said" and "any one frame" shit, you ing | >squirmer. You agree with Einstein and you are an idiot. Ritz said nothing of | >the kind, you lying cunt. You are as bad as Dishwanker and Rot. | >Velocity is NOT measured as "there and back again", and OWLS is | >easily measured from Cassini. | > http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/operations/saturn-time.cfm | >Now shut the up about TWLS, it is NOT the same as OWLS. | | It is in any one frame A. All light produced in that frame moves at c in that | frame. | If it is reflected from a mirror at rest in that frame, the reflected speed | will also be c in that frame....so TWLS = OWLS = c. Wrong. If it is reflected it changes direction, so -c. OWLS = c, TWLS = c-c =0 Even a kid knows about negative numbers. | Even you should be able to work that out. It is terribly obvious really. You are ing insane if you think you can two ways. Androcles. | | >| Androcles would also agree if he had enough remaining brain cells to | >fathom | >| what the hell it all means. | > | > off, drunken old wabo. | | ..... ing whinging pommie bastard.. | | > | >| | >| Einstein said that if you synch clocks """"IN THE AETHER"""" so that tAB = | >tBA | >| then you can forget all about that aether and TWLS will always equal OWLS | >due | >| to clock fiddling. | >| | >| The silly fool was actually right all along but for the wrong reasons. | > | >Idiot, you have no idea what Einstein, Ritz, Lorentz or anyone else said | >or effectively said. Shut up, you ing wino. | | ing old schizo.... | | > | > | >| | >| > | >| >Androcles. | | | HW. | www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm | | ```
 Current Thread Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, (continued) Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, Hexenmeister Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, George Dishman Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, Hexenmeister Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, George Dishman Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, Hexenmeister Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, George Dishman Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, Hexenmeister Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, George Dishman Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, Hexenmeister Message not availableMessage not availableRe: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, Henri Wilson Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, Hexenmeister <= Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, Henri Wilson Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, Hexenmeister Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, Henri Wilson Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, Hexenmeister Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, [email protected] Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, Hexenmeister Message not availableMessage not availableRe: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, Henri Wilson Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, [email protected] Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, Henri Wilson Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment, [email protected]