sci.astro
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment

Subject: Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment
From: Henri Wilson
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 05:59:13 GMT
Newsgroups: sci.astro, sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:15:03 GMT, "Hexenmeister" <vanquish@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message 
>news:qsmg22d8m1do0d0u9g135kqng71dkl71il@xxxxxxxxxx
>| On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 07:43:56 GMT, "Hexenmeister" <vanquish@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
>wrote:

>|
>| It is in any one frame A. All light produced in that frame moves at c in 
>that
>| frame.
>| If it is reflected from a mirror at rest in that frame, the reflected 
>speed
>| will also be c in that frame....so TWLS = OWLS = c.
>
>
>Wrong.  If it is reflected it changes direction, so -c.
>  OWLS = c, TWLS = c-c =0
>Even a kid knows about negative numbers.
>
>| Even you should be able to work that out. It is terribly obvious really.
>
>You are  ing insane if you think you can two ways.

With mirrors, D+ (-D) = 2D

...but radio engineers never learnt optics..

>Androcles.
>
>
>
>|
>| >| Androcles would also agree if he had enough remaining brain cells to
>| >fathom
>| >| what the hell it all means.
>| >
>| >  off, drunken old wabo.
>|
>| ..... ing whinging pommie bastard..
>|
>| >
>| >|
>| >| Einstein said that if you synch clocks """"IN THE AETHER"""" so that 
>tAB =
>| >tBA
>| >| then you can forget all about that aether and TWLS will always equal 
>OWLS
>| >due
>| >| to clock fiddling.
>| >|
>| >| The silly fool was actually right all along but for the wrong reasons.
>| >
>| >Idiot, you have no idea what Einstein, Ritz, Lorentz or anyone else said
>| >or effectively said. Shut up, you  ing wino.
>|
>|  ing old schizo....
>|
>| >
>| >
>| >|
>| >| >
>| >| >Androcles.
>|
>|
>| HW.
>| www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>|
>| 
>


HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>