|
|
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:15:03 GMT, "Hexenmeister" <vanquish@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
>news:qsmg22d8m1do0d0u9g135kqng71dkl71il@xxxxxxxxxx
>| On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 07:43:56 GMT, "Hexenmeister" <vanquish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>wrote:
>|
>| It is in any one frame A. All light produced in that frame moves at c in
>that
>| frame.
>| If it is reflected from a mirror at rest in that frame, the reflected
>speed
>| will also be c in that frame....so TWLS = OWLS = c.
>
>
>Wrong. If it is reflected it changes direction, so -c.
> OWLS = c, TWLS = c-c =0
>Even a kid knows about negative numbers.
>
>| Even you should be able to work that out. It is terribly obvious really.
>
>You are ing insane if you think you can two ways.
With mirrors, D+ (-D) = 2D
...but radio engineers never learnt optics..
>Androcles.
>
>
>
>|
>| >| Androcles would also agree if he had enough remaining brain cells to
>| >fathom
>| >| what the hell it all means.
>| >
>| > off, drunken old wabo.
>|
>| ..... ing whinging pommie bastard..
>|
>| >
>| >|
>| >| Einstein said that if you synch clocks """"IN THE AETHER"""" so that
>tAB =
>| >tBA
>| >| then you can forget all about that aether and TWLS will always equal
>OWLS
>| >due
>| >| to clock fiddling.
>| >|
>| >| The silly fool was actually right all along but for the wrong reasons.
>| >
>| >Idiot, you have no idea what Einstein, Ritz, Lorentz or anyone else said
>| >or effectively said. Shut up, you ing wino.
>|
>| ing old schizo....
>|
>| >
>| >
>| >|
>| >| >
>| >| >Androcles.
>|
>|
>| HW.
>| www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>|
>|
>
HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
|
|