sci.astro
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment

Subject: Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment
From: Henri Wilson
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 09:22:38 GMT
Newsgroups: sci.astro, sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 07:44:20 GMT, "Hexenmeister" <vanquish@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message 
>news:ftjh22dj0sq29o11dh58k9141i26ef589h@xxxxxxxxxx
>| On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:15:03 GMT, "Hexenmeister" <vanquish@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
>wrote:

>| >| It is in any one frame A. All light produced in that frame moves at c 
>in
>| >that
>| >| frame.
>| >| If it is reflected from a mirror at rest in that frame, the reflected
>| >speed
>| >| will also be c in that frame....so TWLS = OWLS = c.
>| >
>| >
>| >Wrong.  If it is reflected it changes direction, so -c.
>| >  OWLS = c, TWLS = c-c =0
>| >Even a kid knows about negative numbers.
>| >
>| >| Even you should be able to work that out. It is terribly obvious 
>really.
>| >
>| >You are  ing insane if you think you can two ways.
>|
>| With mirrors, D+ (-D) = 2D
>|
>| ...but radio engineers never learnt optics..
>
>Sheepshaggers never learned D+ (-D) = 0
>
>You ARE insane.  The laws of optics and electrodynamics are
>the same as the laws of mechanics.
>Go play games with your pal Dishwanker, Wilwanker.
>He's still struggling with whether 4+8 =12 or 8+ 4 =12 given
>that he only has 12 and Doppler shift to work with.
>
>Some of us prefer to discuss physics with the sane, some of
>you are abject arseholes incapable of admitting you are  ed
>in the folded position without being able to stand.

 ing autistic pommie wanker....

>
>| Go play
>
>Speaking of playing games with famous idiots, guess who I saw today?

Was it jesus christ or were you looking in a mirror?

>Androcles.
>
>
>|
>| >Androcles.
>| >
>| >
>| >



HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>