On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 07:44:20 GMT, "Hexenmeister" <vanquish@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
>| On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:15:03 GMT, "Hexenmeister" <vanquish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>| >| It is in any one frame A. All light produced in that frame moves at c
>| >| frame.
>| >| If it is reflected from a mirror at rest in that frame, the reflected
>| >| will also be c in that frame....so TWLS = OWLS = c.
>| >Wrong. If it is reflected it changes direction, so -c.
>| > OWLS = c, TWLS = c-c =0
>| >Even a kid knows about negative numbers.
>| >| Even you should be able to work that out. It is terribly obvious
>| >You are ing insane if you think you can two ways.
>| With mirrors, D+ (-D) = 2D
>| ...but radio engineers never learnt optics..
>Sheepshaggers never learned D+ (-D) = 0
>You ARE insane. The laws of optics and electrodynamics are
>the same as the laws of mechanics.
>Go play games with your pal Dishwanker, Wilwanker.
>He's still struggling with whether 4+8 =12 or 8+ 4 =12 given
>that he only has 12 and Doppler shift to work with.
>Some of us prefer to discuss physics with the sane, some of
>you are abject arseholes incapable of admitting you are ed
>in the folded position without being able to stand.
ing autistic pommie wanker....
>| Go play
>Speaking of playing games with famous idiots, guess who I saw today?
Was it jesus christ or were you looking in a mirror?