sci.astro
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment

Subject: Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment
From: ""
Date: 27 Mar 2006 18:30:49 -0800
Newsgroups: sci.astro, sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Hexenmeister wrote:
> "Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
> news:651f22heul0ah937prqaoun0ab7d7cnbd7@xxxxxxxxxx
> | On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:25:09 GMT, "Hexenmeister" <vanquish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> |
> | >
> | >"George Dishman" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> | >news:e05qtd$s9j$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | >|
> |
> | >|
> | >| Indeed, it should have been translated as "average
> | >| speed". However, the maths is correct and his proof
> | >| is valid.
> | >
> | >Oh,  it's valid to add speed to velocity in vector algebra, is it?
> | >
> | > 'But the ray moves relatively to the initial point of k,
> | >when measured in the stationary system, with the velocity c-v...' --
> | >Einstein.
> | >
> | >That should be 'But the ray moves relatively to the initial point of k,
> | >when measured in the stationary system, with the "average speed" c-v...'
> | >should it?
> | >
> | >Apologise to the translator for  mistaking "Geschwindigkeit" with
> | >"velocity."
> | >He must have been a moron.
> | >
> | >
> | >I'm  ing glad you are an imbecile and not a teacher.
> | >The kids might learn some vulgar English from me, but at least
> | >they'd know mathematics.
> | >Actually children never hear vulgar English from me, I reserve
> | >it for cunts like you; lessons in stupidity are not part of the
> | >curriculum.
> | >
> | >|
> | >| > Shithead Wilson says TWLS = OWLS.
> | >|
> | >| Indeed, he is wrong.
> | >
> | >You've just said "However, the maths is correct and his proof
> | > is valid."
> | >How come when Wilson agrees with Einstein, Wilson is wrong?
> | >I'm  ing glad you are an imbecile and not a teacher.
> |
> | Wilson does not agree with Einstein.
> |
> | Wilson agrees with Ritz..... who effectively said that in any one frame,
> TWLS =
> | OWLS = c.
>
> Don't give me that "effectively said" and "any one frame" shit, you  ing
> squirmer. You agree with Einstein and you are an idiot. Ritz said nothing of
> the kind, you lying cunt. You are as bad as Dishwanker and Rot.
> Velocity is NOT measured as "there and back again", and OWLS is
> easily measured from Cassini.
>   http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/operations/saturn-time.cfm
> Now shut the   up about TWLS, it is NOT the same as OWLS.

That site doesn't address whether the variation in signal transit  is
due to Cassini's
distance from earth, or its relative velocity to it. It has to be a
combination of both, but how do you _prove_ anything from that
information?

Jim G
c'=c+v
>
>
>
> | Androcles would also agree if he had enough remaining brain cells to
> fathom
> | what the hell it all means.
>
>   off, drunken old wabo.
>
> |
> | Einstein said that if you synch clocks """"IN THE AETHER"""" so that tAB =
> tBA
> | then you can forget all about that aether and TWLS will always equal OWLS
> due
> | to clock fiddling.
> |
> | The silly fool was actually right all along but for the wrong reasons.
>
> Idiot, you have no idea what Einstein, Ritz, Lorentz or anyone else said
> or effectively said. Shut up, you  ing wino.
>
>
> |
> | >
> | >Androcles.
> | >
> |
> |
> | HW.
> | www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
> |
> |


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>