sci.astro
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment

Subject: Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment
From: "Jeff Root"
Date: 7 Mar 2006 17:30:32 -0800
Newsgroups: sci.astro, sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Jim Greenfield wrote:

> Your silence on the issue betrays your position.

Jim,

If you won't accept the bet, then at least explain to me
why you won't accept it.  In the worst case, all you stand
to lose is a dollar, an envelope, and postage-- or just a
postcard and postage, if you choose.  If your original
statement accurately reported what The Advertiser said, I
will pay you $10,000.

Your repeated protests that you can't collect are both
groundless and irrelevant.  Even if you really believed
that you can't collect, that would not be a reason to
decline, since it costs you nothing to accept.  And you
have never actually declined.  You have merely claimed
that you have no chance of collecting, without saying
why you make that claim or why you don't accept anyway.
 
   -- Jeff, in Minneapolis


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>