| Subject: | Re: Anyone Here REALLY Believe In Dark Matter? |
|---|---|
| From: | "George Dishman" |
| Date: | 9 Mar 2006 03:15:18 -0800 |
| Newsgroups: | sci.astro, alt.astronomy, alt.philosophy |
Bret Cahill wrote: > Why just have ordinary and dark? Ordinary matter interacts with EM, "dark matter" is so called because almost the only thing we know about it is that it doesn't interact with EM but does have a gravitational influence. > Why not also have red, clear and shiny? > > Chicken gizzards are pretty dark. Those are optical properties so imply an EM interaction. > Why not have fried chicken gizzard matter? Why ask a question if you don't want to know the answer? George |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Interferometry of a Monotonic Source?, Martin Brown |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Interferometry of a Monotonic Source?, W. Watson |
| Previous by Thread: | Dark Matter will send me to hell..., jacob navia |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Anyone Here REALLY Believe In Dark Matter?, Brian Fletcher |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |