Henri Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:16:53 -0000, "George Dishman"
> >If so, the factor k above obviously needs to
> >be 1. The beam that starts at c+v finishes
> >at (c+v)-(c+2v) = -v while the other ends at
> >(c-v)-(c-2v) = +v.
> >"Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> To explain the Sagnac, the light would have to slow
> >> down to a fraction of it original speed in an I-FOG.
> >> It doesn't.
> >> Face it, Henri.
> >> The Sagnac falsifies the ballistic theory.
> >> No way out.
> Why don't you ask Paul to set up our light fibre 'coil experiment' as a PhD
a) Because you are bone idle, do it yourself.
b) Because, if the light doesn't slow to a stop
before it reaches the end of the fibre, it doesn't
produce enough effect to match the experiment
as I told you a few posts back:
George Dishman wrote:
> "Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
> > Is not the ratio ~c+4v?...quite enough to cause the observed fringe shift.
> My back-of-envelope calculation suggests it
> would not be enough. I am still waiting for
> your equations though.
Paul's analysis reaches the same conclusion.
If you want the experiment done, do it yourself,
I told you how you can do it with no special
equipment at all.