sci.astro
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment

Subject: Re: Ballistic Theory and the Sagnac Experiment
From: "George Dishman"
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 15:24:29 -0000
Newsgroups: sci.astro, sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
"Hexenmeister" <vanquish@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
news:7obVf.239896$Q22.142593@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "George Dishman" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:e03eq2$8f0$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> | You may wish to hide behind your incompetence
> | but others do not:
> |
> | http://www.datasync.com/~rsf1/binarie4.htm
> |
> | I think you're just too lazy to do the work.
> |
> | George
>
> "If we take HU Aquarii's published orbit period of 125 minutes"
>
> I KNOW you are just too stupid to understand physics,

Be aware I am quoting from a site supporting Sekerin and
ballistic theory and offering this as an explanation of
why de Sitter's multiple images aren't seen.

> but it takes 90 minutes for Hubble to orbit the Earth.
> 125 minutes to orbit a star is ridiculous.

It is an eclipsing binary with eclipses happening
once every 125 minutes.

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist-Shannon_sampling_theorem

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>