|
|
T Wake wrote:
"WinField" <doghouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:8Cqkf.378$oz5.164@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
T Wake wrote:
Only as long as scientific methods are being used.
Whose scientific methods? Yours? Mine? Darwin's?
Personally I prefer Popper's approach. However, we can have a starting point
here.
I propose that the scientific method we use is based on being able to
provide a possible experiment which would falsify the theory.
Is that acceptable to you? If not, what is yours?
Fudd's Law: it goes in - it must come out
Correllary to Fudd: if you push something hard enough, it will
fall over
You use Popper, and try to experimentally falsify the above. I'm just
going to relax and go-to-school on your science methodology. Use
anything from atomic structure to Universe no-edge space_time to your
blue-banana Math -- just don't bring Texas or Texans into this.
The stage is yours, T Wake.
- Winfield
|
|