Re: Intelligent Design

Subject:	Re: Intelligent Design
From:	Scott Miller
Date:	Thu, 01 Dec 2005 23:57:56 -0500
Newsgroups:	sci.astro, sci.astro.amateur, sci.physics, sci.skeptic, sci.archaeology

cnctut wrote:

I have no end goal--other than to seek the truth. How about this
twist--assume ID is true and attempt to prove that it isn't.

Best Wishes

Tut

Better still, show it's basic premise is falsifiable. Else it is notscience.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Intelligent Design, (continued) Re: Intelligent Design, cnctut Re: Intelligent Design, Jonathan Silverlight Re: Intelligent Design, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) Re: Intelligent Design, cnctut Re: Intelligent Design, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) Re: Intelligent Design, T Wake Re: Intelligent Design, Bob Cain Re: Intelligent Design, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) Re: Intelligent Design, Colin J Denman Re: Intelligent Design, T Wake Re: Intelligent Design, Scott Miller <= WATCH YOUR FOLLOW UPS Re: Intelligent Design, Tedd Jacobs Re: Intelligent Design, Mr Clarke Re: Intelligent Design, T Wake Re: Intelligent Design, WinField Re: Intelligent Design, T Wake Re: Intelligent Design, WinField Re: Intelligent Design, T Wake Re: Intelligent Design, WinField Re: Intelligent Design, T Wake Re: Intelligent Design, WinField

Previous by Date:	Re: Intelligent Design, PD
Next by Date:	SOHO's ten-year triumph in unmasking the Sun (Forwarded), Andrew Yee
Previous by Thread:	Re: Intelligent Design, T Wake
Next by Thread:	WATCH YOUR FOLLOW UPS Re: Intelligent Design, Tedd Jacobs
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]