Re: Maximal Light Delay

Subject:	Re: Maximal Light Delay
From:	"redbelly"
Date:	19 Aug 2005 15:45:43 -0700
Newsgroups:	sci.astro, sci.optics, sci.physics

George, Jonathan,

Pardon my interruption, but ... you both seem like reasonable people.
Is there some reason why this discussion goes on with no end in sight?
Has ignoring him not worked in the past?  Or perhaps deep down you
believe he is teachable?

Mark

p.s. Not trying to yank your chains here, it just seems (to me, anyway)
futile to continue explaining the same stuff over and over.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Maximal Light Delay, (continued) Re: Maximal Light Delay, Jonathan Silverlight Re: Maximal Light Delay, George Dishman Re: Maximal Light Delay, r9ns Re: Maximal Light Delay, Jonathan Silverlight Re: Maximal Light Delay, Bob May Re: Maximal Light Delay, George Dishman Message not available Message not available Message not available Message not available Message not available Message not available Re: Maximal Light Delay, r9ns Re: Maximal Light Delay, George Dishman Re: Maximal Light Delay, Bob May Re: Maximal Light Delay, George Dishman Re: Maximal Light Delay, redbelly <= Re: Maximal Light Delay, George Dishman Re: Maximal Light Delay, redbelly Re: Maximal Light Delay, Androcles Re: Maximal Light Delay, George Dishman Re: Maximal Light Delay, Androcles Re: Maximal Light Delay, r9ns Re: Maximal Light Delay, Jonathan Silverlight Message not available Re: Maximal Light Delay, Jonathan Silverlight Re: Maximal Light Delay, r9ns Re: Maximal Light Delay, Jonathan Silverlight

Previous by Date:	Re: Given the unknow cause of the error in pioneer acceleration calculations, will the400 meter diameter asteroid Apophis hit earth in 2029?, Diana Ethridge
Next by Date:	Re: Maximal Light Delay, redbelly
Previous by Thread:	Re: Maximal Light Delay, George Dishman
Next by Thread:	Re: Maximal Light Delay, George Dishman
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]