|
|
"Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote:
>"Andy Clews" <A.Clews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:dfs0uq$p1a$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[plonkfest]
>| Hmm, if we *plonk* enough posters we could generate a critical mass
>and
>| create stellar plonkfiles.
>
>Indeed we could. I make it a policy to plonk the incompetent arrogant
>know-it-all's that can only parrot text book material and refuse to
>discuss
>other possiblities.
Curious how you refer to me as an incompetent, arrogant know-it-all
when all I've done is question you on your hypothesis (see how
arrogant I am? I think you were talking about me!). I haven't
presented any material at all, I've merely tried to understand the
evidence which led you to your apparently revolutionary statement. I
was trying to discuss the possibility you presented, which you
apparently took for a personal attack. You won't get very far
promoting your theories if you take criticism of your theory and
evidence personally.
Tim
--
You are being watched. This gives you power.
|
|