Re: The Sacred Cows Of Physics Re: The ET UFO Park-n-Ride Tarmac of Venus

[John Griffin]

"Brad Guth" <ieisbradguth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> http://www.waynemadsenrep­ort.com/intelwhispers/int­el.htm,
>>The notion that "for every action there is an opposite and
>>equal reaction" is NOT true.
> I bet now you're in trouble for pissing off those "sacred cows
> of physics".

Whoever the   you're yapping about is rolling on the floor 
laughing with anger...???  No. Alexa's dumb statement was just 
more amusement.

> How about the fable as to the one of "energy-in = energy-out"?
> 
> Can not the likes of a black hole and antimatter absorb
> energy, with no intentions of ever releasing it?

Thats' a silly question.  When matter falls into a black hole, 
the "new" black hole has acquired its momentum. I never heard of 
the idea of antimatter absorbing energy. Where'd that come from?

> If there's antimatter, shouldn't there be anti-gravity?

So, since there's  , there oughta be anti ?