"Brad Guth" <ieisbradguth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>The notion that "for every action there is an opposite and
>>equal reaction" is NOT true.
> I bet now you're in trouble for pissing off those "sacred cows
> of physics".
Whoever the you're yapping about is rolling on the floor
laughing with anger...??? No. Alexa's dumb statement was just
> How about the fable as to the one of "energy-in = energy-out"?
> Can not the likes of a black hole and antimatter absorb
> energy, with no intentions of ever releasing it?
Thats' a silly question. When matter falls into a black hole,
the "new" black hole has acquired its momentum. I never heard of
the idea of antimatter absorbing energy. Where'd that come from?
> If there's antimatter, shouldn't there be anti-gravity?
So, since there's , there oughta be anti ?