sci.astro.amateur
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial)

Subject: Re: Rules of Evidence S&T January Editorial
From: "William R. Mattil"
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 00:22:13 GMT
Newsgroups: sci.astro.amateur
[email protected] wrote:


I wonder if m104galaxy is the previous CEO of Meade or just one of the
shills that Meade pays to say how wonderfull Meade is.


Actually he is a complete idiot and had you *not* included his rant in your reply most of us would have missed. He's been killfiled by all the regulars by now.



Regards

Bill

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: re:Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), (continued)
      • Re: re:Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), [email protected]
    • Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), [email protected]
    • Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), [email protected]
    • Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), [email protected]
    • Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), Melweaver
      • Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), [email protected]
        • Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), rpasken
          • Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), William R. Mattil <=
            • Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), [email protected]
            • Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), [email protected]
            • Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), Jan Owen
          • Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), [email protected]
            • Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), thad
              • Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), [email protected]
      • Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), George Normandin