|
|
M104galaxy@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> To show you just how silly this lawsuit is, go to the home page of OGS
> where it is stated that OGS builds "the world's finest line of RC
> telescopes".
>
> See www.opticalguidancesystems.com/
>
> Where does this then leave RCOS--second best; third best to DFM??
> RCOS should sue OGS for "racketeering"?? "Fradulent advertising"??
>
> Such ridiculous nonsense. Wait until "discovery" starts and both RCOS
> and Star have to open their books and records to public
> inspection--this should prove very interesting.
>
> And Dan Azari under oath in a deposition will be a hoot!
No shit, Sherlock! :-)
And there are other Azaris in the mix (with RCOS).
You might find this interesting, too. In the Yahoo "tec-scopes" group
in
message:
<http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tec-scopes/message/517>
dated Tue Nov 5, 2002 9:56 pm we find Dan Azari writing:
Hi Valery and all,
I was the first recipient of a RCOS/Aries ion milled optical set and,
having owned a hand/machine polished RC, I can attest to the improved
surface smoothness. Although the p-v wave front error is about 1/6
wave, the rms error is an amazing 1/55 wave. The high quality of the
optics was apparent the moment I first looked through this instrument.
I agree with Valery: The high-tech approach to complex optical figures
has advantages.
Clear skies,
Dan Azari
And he was fooled by Meade's advertising? What a crock.
|
|