sci.astro.amateur (date)

sci.astro.amateur (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

November 30, 2006

Re: Lost Almost, Llanzlan Klazmon the 15th, 22:06
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, Gil, 20:55
Re: ETX-90 PE questions, Joe S., 20:25
Re: Law of Orbits, Greg Crinklaw, 20:17
Re: ETX-90 PE questions, Craig, 19:16
Re: Law of Orbits, lal_truckee, 19:10
Re: And they won't get there with chemical rockets from the 1960s, Richard F.L.R.Snashall, 18:59
And they won't get there with chemical rockets from the 1960s, Rich, 18:47
Re: C11 collimation woes, Bryan, 18:46
Re: C11 collimation woes, John Moore, 17:07
Re: Lost Almost, Starlord, 17:06
Re: Does this guy know what he's talking about??, Brian Tung, 16:53
Re: Does this guy know what he's talking about??, RMOLLISE, 16:43
Re: C11 collimation woes, Roger Hamlett, 16:43
Re: Guide Scope, Chris L Peterson, 16:25
Guide Scope, BClay, 15:45
Re: WARNING: Geomagnetic K-index of 5 expected, Chris L Peterson, 15:38
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, Shawn, 15:33
What is dark energy? What is dark matter?, esmartguy, 15:21
Re: C11 collimation woes, John Moore, 15:20
Re: An Ancient Computer Surprises Scientists, Martin Brown, 14:44
Re: ETX-90 PE questions, Joe S., 14:40
Re: ETX-90 PE questions, RMOLLISE, 14:18
Re: An Ancient Computer Surprises Scientists, Richard Tobin, 14:16
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, AM, 14:12
Re: Lost Almost, RMOLLISE, 14:05
Re: Does this guy know what he's talking about??, Joe S., 13:46
Re: Lost Almost, Starlord, 12:45
Re: Beyond Rosamond Report, Ioannis, 12:32
Re: WARNING: Geomagnetic K-index of 5 expected, thad, 12:29
Re: Spraying insecticide on the grounds of a public star party, thad, 12:18
WARNING: Geomagnetic K-Index of 6 expected, Sam Wormley, 11:17
Re: Lost Almost, Stuart Chapman, 10:51
Spraying insecticide on the grounds of a public star party, <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxx>, 10:41
Re: Does this guy know what he's talking about??, Humble Pie, 10:30
WARNING: Geomagnetic K-index of 5 expected, Sam Wormley, 10:05
Re: Does this guy know what he's talking about??, G, 09:58
Re: Collimation, Humble Pie, 09:57
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, Humble Pie, 09:35
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, Humble Pie, 09:27
Re: Science and Reincarnation, Richard F.L.R.Snashall, 09:15
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, Humble Pie, 09:12
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, Humble Pie, 09:04
Lost Almost, Starlord, 08:51
Re: Beyond Rosamond Report, Baby Rasheed, 08:39
Re: Law of Orbits, Starlord, 08:39
Re: C11 collimation woes, Baby Rasheed, 08:35
Re: Does this guy know what he's talking about??, thad, 07:35
Re: Law of Orbits, Chris L Peterson, 07:09
Re: Law of Orbits, Greg Crinklaw, 05:34
Re: Law of Orbits, Greg Crinklaw, 05:32
Re: An Ancient Computer Surprises Scientists, Eugene Griessel, 04:03
Re: Beyond Rosamond Report, whowell, 03:59
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, Davoud, 03:34
Re: Beyond Rosamond Report, lal_truckee, 03:18
stephen paul!, starburst, 02:34
Re: Does this guy know what he's talking about??, Chris L Peterson, 02:18
Re: Does this guy know what he's talking about??, Brian Tung, 02:12
Re: An Ancient Computer Surprises Scientists, Brian Tung, 02:10
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, Matthew Ota, 01:44
Does this guy know what he's talking about??, Joe S., 01:37
ETX-90 PE questions, Joe S., 01:35
Re: Beyond Rosamond Report, Matthew Ota, 01:33
Re: Collimation, Joe S., 01:31
Re: An Ancient Computer Surprises Scientists, David G. Nagel, 00:48
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, AM, 00:39
An Ancient Computer Surprises Scientists, Rick Evans, 00:19
Re: Collimation, Dennis Woos, 00:11

November 29, 2006

Collimation, Steve & Lizzie, 23:20
Re: Law of Orbits, Chris L Peterson, 23:19
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, William Hamblen, 23:18
Re: wouldnt it be nice if this group were moderated?, TBerk, 23:14
Re: Little Dipper, Curtis Croulet, 22:09
Re: Law of Orbits, oriel36, 21:57
Re: Law of Orbits, Jim Hewitt, 20:55
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, Craig, 20:40
Ancient Moon 'computer' revisited, Gareth Slee, 19:59
Re: Law of Orbits, Greg Crinklaw, 19:47
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, Bob Schmall, 19:36
Snowy ATA panorama., Jason H., 19:32
Re: Law of Orbits, AustinMN, 19:31
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, Chris L Peterson, 19:22
Re: Law of Orbits, oriel36, 19:20
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, Dennis Woos, 19:08
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, Rich, 19:08
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, dk, 18:21
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, Mark Gingrich, 17:50
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, laura halliday, 17:50
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, Bob Tenney, 17:50
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, Chris L Peterson, 17:26
Hi-res movies of the Sun from Solar-B (Hinode), Paul Neave, 17:16
Re: Law of Orbits, Greg Crinklaw, 17:05
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, Tom Polakis, 16:51
Re: wouldnt it be nice if this group were moderated?, Starlord, 16:47
Re: wouldnt it be nice if this group were moderated?, Starlord, 16:46
Re: Law of Orbits, Chris L Peterson, 16:37
Re: Law of Orbits, Greg Crinklaw, 16:19
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, Chris L Peterson, 16:15
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, Chris L Peterson, 16:09
Re: Law of Orbits, Chris L Peterson, 16:06
Re: Law of Orbits, Greg Crinklaw, 15:51
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, AM, 15:48
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, AustinMN, 15:23
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, RMOLLISE, 13:26
Re: wouldnt it be nice if this group were moderated?, jsavard, 13:11
Re: Law of Orbits, west, 11:59
Re: C11 collimation woes, Roger Hamlett, 11:07
Re: wouldnt it be nice if this group were moderated?, Roger Hamlett, 11:07
Re: 90mm Apochromatic Refractor under $ 1000, Mij Adyaw, 09:17
Re: wouldnt it be nice if this group were moderated?, Mij Adyaw, 09:12
Re: Little Dipper, Paul Schlyter, 08:42
Re: 90mm Apochromatic Refractor under $ 1000, Trailer Trash ReUnion, 08:35
Re: Law of Orbits, Trailer Trash ReUnion, 08:34
Re: wouldnt it be nice if this group were moderated?, Trailer Trash ReUnion, 08:33
Re: C11 collimation woes, Trailer Trash ReUnion, 08:29
Re: Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, Davoud, 07:10
Re: CCD Camera - First Light, Davoud, 07:03
Re: Little Dipper, Curtis Croulet, 06:14
Smoking on the grounds of a public star party, Dave Jessie, 05:59
Re: Law of Orbits, Brian Tung, 05:42
Re: wouldnt it be nice if this group were moderated?, SkySea, 05:30
90mm Apochromatic Refractor under $ 1000, william optics, 04:29
Re: wouldnt it be nice if this group were moderated?, Joe S., 03:55
Re: Law of Orbits, Sam Wormley, 03:50
Law of Orbits, west, 03:39
Re: CCD Camera - First Light, RMOLLISE, 03:07
Re: wouldnt it be nice if this group were moderated?, RMOLLISE, 03:05
Re: wouldnt it be nice if this group were moderated?, Shawn, 01:52
Re: wouldnt it be nice if this group were moderated?, L.A.T., 01:24

November 28, 2006

Re: CCD Camera - First Light, AM, 23:21
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Jax, 23:20
wouldnt it be nice if this group were moderated?, Eric, 22:53
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, jsavard, 22:49
A strange-looking sunspot is emerging on the sun, Sam Wormley, 22:44
Re: An Unusual "Cloud" on Tuesday Evening, November 21, Dave Mitsky, 22:04
Re: An Unusual "Cloud" on Tuesday Evening, November 21, Dave Mitsky, 22:04
Re: Comet SWAN (friday night), Dave Mitsky, 21:47
Re: Comet SWAN (friday night), Dave Mitsky, 21:45
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Jax, 21:42
Re: Photographic Size of a Star, Chris L Peterson, 21:35
Re: CCD Camera - First Light, Pierre Vandevenne, 21:14
Re: Photographic Size of a Star, Chris L Peterson, 21:04
Re: C11 collimation woes, AstroApp, 20:55
Re: Photographic Size of a Star, Ioannis, 20:55
Re: Photographic Size of a Star, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx, 20:51
Re: Photographic Size of a Star, Chris L Peterson, 20:25
Re: Photographic Size of a Star, Ioannis, 20:07
CCD Camera - First Light, Davoud, 19:14
Re: Quick cup o joe w John Dobson, Martin R. Howell, 18:04
Re: Little Dipper, Chris L Peterson, 17:51
Re: Little Dipper, Curtis Croulet, 17:44
Re: Photographic Size of a Star, Roger Hamlett, 17:32
Re: Photographic Size of a Star, Chris L Peterson, 16:16
Re: Photographic Size of a Star, Chris L Peterson, 15:46
Re: Photographic Size of a Star, AustinMN, 15:35
Re: Tycho Catalogue, Emanuele D'Arrigo, 15:31
Re: Little Dipper, Richard Tobin, 15:30
Re: Photographic Size of a Star, William C. Keel, 15:25
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), Pierre Vandevenne, 14:42
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), Pierre Vandevenne, 14:36
Re: Tycho Catalogue, Stupendous_Man, 14:23
Photographic Size of a Star, Emanuele D'Arrigo, 14:09
Tycho Catalogue, Emanuele D'Arrigo, 13:18
Quick cup o joe w John Dobson, Uncle Bob, 10:45
Re: Little Dipper, Borat, 10:24
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), Trane Francks, 09:47
Re: Little Dipper, KLM, 09:43
Re: Little Dipper, Paul Schlyter, 09:42
Re: Using Junk Food to Locate M57 (repost), KLM, 09:39
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), thad, 07:50
Re: Little Dipper, Mitnick, 07:14
Re: Little Dipper, Chris L Peterson, 07:04
Little Dipper, Curtis Croulet, 06:43
Re: Java applet of exoplanets (cnrs), canopus56, 06:15
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), William R. Mattil, 05:47
Re: Does a naked-eye gain of +1.5 magnitudes imply an equal telescopic gain?, Pierre Vandevennne, 05:37
Does a naked-eye gain of +1.5 magnitudes imply an equal telescopic gain?, allisonki, 04:58
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), Chris L Peterson, 04:54
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), Pierre Vandevenne, 04:11
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), Pierre Vandevenne, 04:00
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), William R. Mattil, 03:24
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), thad, 03:06
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), thad, 02:56
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), Rich, 02:45
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), Chris L Peterson, 00:34
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), William R. Mattil, 00:23
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), AM, 00:17
Re: Vastu Made Easy with Vastu Compass, Rich, 00:17
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), Rich, 00:14

November 27, 2006

Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), Chris L Peterson, 23:24
Re: Mac Breck?, Starlord, 23:18
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), William R. Mattil, 22:48
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), canopus56, 22:11
Dern Near Skywatch Time, RMOLLISE, 21:44
Re: An Unusual "Cloud" on Tuesday Evening, November 21, Alan French, 21:15
Re: Mac Breck?, Starlord, 21:04
Re: Mac Breck?, Gareth Slee, 19:43
Mac Breck?, Starlord, 19:34
Re: Using Junk Food to Locate M57 (repost), John Nichols, 19:18
Re: An Unusual "Cloud" on Tuesday Evening, November 21, Dave Mitsky, 18:36
Rosamond Report, Starlord, 18:17
Re: Beyond Rosamond Report, Ioannis, 17:54
Re: Beyond Rosamond Report, Chris L Peterson, 17:22
Using Junk Food to Locate M57 (repost), Martin R. Howell, 17:20
Re: M57, Ring Nebula, Willie R . Meghar, 17:13
Re: Comet SWAN (friday night), Willie R . Meghar, 17:13
Re: telescope for beginner, Willie R . Meghar, 17:13
Re: C11 collimation woes, John Moore, 17:05
Re: Beyond Rosamond Report, Starlord, 16:36
Re: C11 collimation woes, Dennis Woos, 14:49
Re: Java applet of exoplanets (cnrs), Paul Schlyter, 14:42
Re: M57, Ring Nebula, Rick Evans, 14:08
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), RMOLLISE, 13:50
Java applet of exoplanets (cnrs), Thierry, 13:36
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), Pierre Vandevenne, 11:42
Re: C11 collimation woes, John Moore, 10:31
Re: Beyond Rosamond Report, Eskimow Jon, 10:16
wikisky - interactive online sky map, kostya30, 08:27
V838 Mon video podcast on YouTube, aprice4, 07:03
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), bratislav3162, 06:29
Re: C11 collimation woes, lal_truckee, 05:11
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, jsavard, 04:11
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), gobbletwo, 02:51
First Storm a comming, Starlord, 02:49
Re: M57, Ring Nebula, parsec, 02:17
Re: M57, Ring Nebula, Joe S., 02:08
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), jsavard, 02:07
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), jsavard, 02:05
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), jsavard, 02:00
Re: M57, Ring Nebula, Michael McCulloch, 01:34
Re: C11 collimation woes, RMOLLISE, 00:48
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:20

November 26, 2006

Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), Chris L Peterson, 23:39
Re: Space Golf, Greg Crinklaw, 23:00
Re: Beyond Rosamond Report, Starlord, 22:55
Re: Beyond Rosamond Report, Ioannis, 22:03
Re: Decimalising RA and Dec Values, Paul Schlyter, 21:43
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), canopus56, 20:55
Re: Beyond Rosamond Report, Matthew Ota, 20:53
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), RMOLLISE, 17:10
Re: telescope for beginner, RMOLLISE, 17:01
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), Chris L Peterson, 16:56
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), AM, 16:33
Re: C11 collimation woes, RMOLLISE, 16:26
Re: C11 collimation woes, RMOLLISE, 16:26
Re: C11 collimation woes, RMOLLISE, 16:26
Re: Vastu Made Easy with Vastu Compass, RMOLLISE, 16:21
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), Chris L Peterson, 16:20
Re: C11 collimation woes, RMOLLISE, 16:18
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), Chris L Peterson, 16:12
Re: C11 collimation woes, RMOLLISE, 16:12
Re: A focuser for a Meade LX200 14", RMOLLISE, 16:04
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), AM, 16:04
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), RMOLLISE, 16:03
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), Chris L Peterson, 15:48
Re: telescope for beginner, Jax, 15:44
Re: C11 collimation woes, John Moore, 14:14
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), AM, 12:57
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), allisonki, 12:36
Re: C11 collimation woes, Roger Hamlett, 11:35
Re: C11 collimation woes, John Moore, 11:17
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), Opera Bannana, 10:08
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), Opera Bannana, 10:07
Re: C11 collimation woes, Opera Bannana, 10:06
Re: C11 collimation woes, Reply to Super MORON, 09:49
Re: telescope for beginner, Reply to Super MORON, 09:35
Re: telescope for beginner, Reply to Super MORON, 09:34
Re: Can anyone recommend a company to recoat a SCT secondary?, Reply to Super MORON, 09:28
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), Chris L Peterson, 06:58
Re: Decimalising RA and Dec Values, Chris L Peterson, 06:53
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), Shawn, 06:49
Beyond Rosamond Report, Starlord, 06:33
Re: M57, Ring Nebula, Matthew Ota, 06:16
Re: Decimalising RA and Dec Values, burtond, 06:08
Re: Using a C14, SkySea, 04:57
Re: It works now(I hope), Phil Wheeler, 03:59
Re: M57, Ring Nebula, Florian, 03:27
Re: It works now(I hope), Rich, 03:08
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), muddy, 03:05
Re: Vastu Made Easy with Vastu Compass, Rich, 03:03
Re: It works now(I hope), Uncle Bob, 02:58
M57, Ring Nebula, Joe S., 02:57
Re: Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), Uncle Bob, 02:51
Re: C11 collimation woes, Uncle Bob, 02:48
Re: Decimalising RA and Dec Values, canopus56, 01:53
Re: Decimalising RA and Dec Values, Brian Tung, 01:32
Re: A focuser for a Meade LX200 14", thad, 01:17
Rules of Evidence (S&T January Editorial), gobbletwo, 00:31

November 25, 2006

Re: C11 collimation woes, Roger Hamlett, 23:38
Re: Decimalising RA and Dec Values, canopus56, 23:19
Re: A focuser for a Meade LX200 14", solstici, 23:16
Re: C11 collimation woes, RMOLLISE, 23:07
Re: C11 collimation woes, RMOLLISE, 22:59
Re: An Unusual "Cloud" on Tuesday Evening, November 21, Alan French, 22:54
Re: C11 collimation woes, John Moore, 22:06
Re: Using a C14, laura halliday, 21:07
Re: Decimalising RA and Dec Values, dylan, 20:50
Re: Vixen Porta and Icarus slo-mo alt az mounts, Alan Charlesworth, 17:42
Re: 'Harry Potter', The Occult, etc..., Mij Adyaw, 16:50
Re: Using a C14, RMOLLISE, 16:34
Re: Vastu Made Easy with Vastu Compass, RMOLLISE, 16:29
Re: Vastu Made Easy with Vastu Compass, Matthew Ota, 15:41
Re: An Unusual "Cloud" on Tuesday Evening, November 21, kapella1, 15:41
Re: C11 collimation woes, Roger Hamlett, 15:20
Re: C11 collimation woes, Allan Mayer, 14:00
Re: Decimalising RA and Dec Values, Odysseus, 13:26
Re: Vastu Made Easy with Vastu Compass, jsavard, 13:22
Re: C11 collimation woes, John Moore, 11:27
Re: C11 collimation woes, John Moore, 11:24
Re: Using a C14, Eric, 10:56
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Trane Francks, 10:19
Re: Using a C14, Terry B, 09:29
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, thad, 08:36
Re: telescope for beginner, Don't Be Evil, 05:53
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Don't Be Evil, 05:50
Re: An Unusual "Cloud" on Tuesday Evening, November 21, Ron Lee, 02:51
Re: 'Harry Potter', The Occult, etc..., Jim Klein, 02:20
Re: 'Harry Potter', The Occult, etc..., Jim Klein, 02:18
Re: Decimalising RA and Dec Values, canopus56, 01:28
Re: Decimalising RA and Dec Values, Al, 01:19
Re: A focuser for a Meade LX200 14", Matthew Ota, 01:14
Re: Decimalising RA and Dec Values, Matt, 00:35
Re: It works now(I hope), Starlord, 00:33
Re: It works now(I hope), Sjouke Burry, 00:25

November 24, 2006

Re: Decimalising RA and Dec Values, Matt, 23:44
Re: It works now(I hope), Phil Wheeler, 23:04
Re: telescope for beginner, Daniel Minge, 22:58
Re: Icy ProtoMoon, a Lithobraking Arrival, Brad Guth, 22:37
Re: Icy ProtoMoon, a Lithobraking Arrival, Brad Guth, 22:29
Re: C11 collimation woes, Roger Hamlett, 22:28
Re: It works now(I hope), Starlord, 22:18
Re: C11 collimation woes, Allan Mayer, 21:36
Re: A focuser for a Meade LX200 14", RMOLLISE, 21:23
A focuser for a Meade LX200 14", solstici, 21:18
Re: An Unusual "Cloud" on Tuesday Evening, November 21, David G. Nagel, 21:02
Re: It works now(I hope), Phil Wheeler, 19:10
Re: C11 collimation woes, John Moore, 18:29
Re: An Unusual "Cloud" on Tuesday Evening, November 21, Alan French, 18:03
Re: C11 collimation woes, Roger Hamlett, 18:01
Re: More telescopes from Chiefland star party., Jason H., 16:25
Small 'Scope, Large Camera, Davoud, 16:21
C11 collimation woes, John Moore, 16:12
Re: telescope for beginner, RMOLLISE, 14:37
Re: Vastu Made Easy with Vastu Compass, RMOLLISE, 14:35
Re: Decimalising RA and Dec Values, Greg Neill, 13:50
Vastu Made Easy with Vastu Compass, Vastu99, 12:36
Re: It works now(I hope), Trane Francks, 10:22
Re: Icy ProtoMoon, a Lithobraking Arrival, Phineas T Puddleduck, 10:05
Re: It works now(I hope), Phil Wheeler, 10:02
Re: Using a C14, Eric, 07:56
Re: An Unusual "Cloud" on Tuesday Evening, November 21, Dennis Woos, 06:30
Re: More telescopes from Chiefland star party., lal_truckee, 06:28
Re: Decimalising RA and Dec Values, canopus56, 05:54
Re: Icy ProtoMoon, a Lithobraking Arrival, The Ghost In The Machine, 05:43
Re: ACLU Making Headlines Again, raven1, 04:59
Re: Icy ProtoMoon, a Lithobraking Arrival, Brad Guth, 04:55
Re: Icy ProtoMoon, a Lithobraking Arrival, Brad Guth, 04:52
Re: telescope for beginner, Starlord, 04:25
Re: Decimalising RA and Dec Values, Al, 04:12
Re: telescope for beginner, Al, 03:43
Re: More telescopes from Chiefland star party., Jason H., 03:17
Re: ACLU Making Headlines Again, Thanksgiving Republican, 03:14
Re: telescope for beginner, Joe S., 03:02
Re: ACLU Making Headlines Again, Thanksgiving Republican `, 02:59
telescope for beginner, ggorman, 02:25
Re: Decimalising RA and Dec Values, OG, 01:19
Re: Decimalising RA and Dec Values, Eric, 00:39
Decimalising RA and Dec Values, Matt, 00:29
Re: Italian holydays, Noquarter, 00:09

November 23, 2006

Re: Using a C14, Terry B, 23:26
Re: Icy ProtoMoon, a Lithobraking Arrival, Robert Weldon, 23:08
Re: Using a C14, nytecam, 22:33
Re: An Unusual "Cloud" on Tuesday Evening, November 21, Jim Shaffer, 22:17
Re: Mount compatibility (alt az), Howard Lester, 19:02
An Unusual "Cloud" on Tuesday Evening, November 21, Dave Mitsky, 18:11
An Unusual "Cloud" on Tuesday Evening, November 21, Dave Mitsky, 18:11
Re: Comet SWAN (friday night), George Normandin, 17:33
Re: Mount compatibility (alt az), Alan Charlesworth, 17:14
Re: Using a C14, RMOLLISE, 16:28
Re: Using a C14, RMOLLISE, 16:27
Re: Italian holydays, RMOLLISE, 16:25
Re: Happy Thanksgiving, USA!, Allan Mayer, 15:22
Re: "RNC Strategy" is an oxymoron, Allan Mayer, 15:18
Re: Can anyone recommend a company to recoat a SCT secondary?, Allan Mayer, 15:16
Re: Italian holydays, glm2006ITALY, 13:10
ALERT: Geomagnetic K-index of 5, Sam Wormley, 12:53
Happy Thanksgiving from William Optics, william optics, 11:18
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, thad, 10:43
Re: Bottle of Dark Matter?, Hey American Moron!, 10:06
Re: Bottle of Dark Matter?, Hey American Moron!, 10:04
Re: Wanted: Volunteer to land on asteroid, nudge it away from Earth, Hey American Moron!, 10:02
Re: Black hole, Hey American Moron!, 10:00
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Hey American Moron!, 09:55
Re: Can anyone recommend a company to recoat a SCT secondary?, Hey American Moron!, 09:54
Re: To The Aussies, John, 08:00
Re: Using a C14, Terry B, 06:48
Re: Using a C14, George Normandin, 06:23
Re: More telescopes from Chiefland star party., George Normandin, 06:11
Re: Telescopes from Chiefland Star Party (images taken Nov. 18 & 19, 2006), George Normandin, 05:46
Using a C14, Terry B, 05:32
It works now(I hope), Starlord, 05:27
Re: Space Golf, Starlord, 05:04
Re: Space Golf, allisonki, 04:42
Re: Celestron Sky Scout, brucegooglegroups, 03:43
Re: Space Golf, Trane Francks, 02:15
Dec. 9 Star Party, Starlord, 02:04
Re: Space Golf, Ioannis, 02:01
Re: To The Aussies, Terry B, 01:53
Space Golf, Starlord, 01:50
Re: Mount compatibility, hitchcot, 00:54
Re: To The Aussies, Starlord, 00:39
To The Aussies, Terry B, 00:05

November 22, 2006

Help switching from wedge to alt-azimuth, jsheff, 22:58
Re: Chinese Meade - Serues 4000 QX wide angle eyepieces ?, RMOLLISE, 22:56
Re: Bottle of Dark Matter?, Jim Klein, 22:08
Re: Bottle of Dark Matter?, Ernie Dunbar, 21:28
Re: Bottle of Dark Matter?, Iordani, 19:51
Re: Celestron Sky Scout, John Nichols, 18:41
Chinese Meade - Serues 4000 QX wide angle eyepieces ?, Sixtus, 18:08
Re: Mount compatibility, Alan Charlesworth, 17:02
Re: Mount compatibility, Alan Charlesworth, 17:00
Re: Bottle of Dark Matter?, esmartguy, 16:45
Re: Celestron Sky Scout, thad, 16:34
Re: Celestron Sky Scout, Chris L Peterson, 16:03
Re: Binocular Astronomy by Crossen and Tirion, Jim, 15:53
Re: Celestron Sky Scout, brucegooglegroups, 15:17
Re: Refractor Opinions Sought, Howard Lester, 13:42
Re: Binocular Astronomy by Crossen and Tirion, pierre . dessemontet, 12:18
Re: Refractor Opinions Sought, thad, 07:56
Re: Refractor Opinions Sought, Dave, 07:27
More telescopes from Chiefland star party., Jason H., 07:22
Re: Icy ProtoMoon, a Lithobraking Arrival, Allan Mayer, 06:36
Re: Icy ProtoMoon, a Lithobraking Arrival, Brad Guth, 04:02
Re: Icy ProtoMoon, a Lithobraking Arrival, Al, 03:21
Re: Binocular Astronomy by Crossen and Tirion, canopus56, 02:41
Re: OT:First cold wave and no power, Starlord, 02:08
Re: OT:First cold wave and no power, Tater, 01:26
Re: Bottle of Dark Matter?, Richard Tobin, 00:54
Re: Icy ProtoMoon, a Lithobraking Arrival, David Knisely, 00:44
Re: Mount compatibility, hitchcot, 00:26

November 21, 2006

Re: Mount compatibility, RMOLLISE, 23:22
Re: Icy ProtoMoon, a Lithobraking Arrival, Brad Guth, 21:55
NASA'S Mars Global Surveyor May be at Mission's End, Sam Wormley, 21:24
Re: Bottle of Dark Matter?, Sam Wormley, 20:59
Re: Opinions on Meade truss-tube Dob?, Rune Allnor, 20:39
Re: Icy ProtoMoon, a Lithobraking Arrival, Brad Guth, 20:35
Re: Icy ProtoMoon, a Lithobraking Arrival, Allan Mayer, 19:41
Re: Celestron Sky Scout, John Nichols, 19:18
Binocular Astronomy by Crossen and Tirion, brucegooglegroups, 16:31
Celestron Sky Scout, brucegooglegroups, 16:29
OT:First cold wave and no power, Starlord, 16:25
Re: Bottle of Dark Matter?, Chris L Peterson, 16:06
Re: Bottle of Dark Matter?, esmartguy, 14:46
Re: 7 Iris - an easy asteriod - is visible, Paul Schlyter, 08:42
Re: 7 Iris - an easy asteriod - is visible, Paul Schlyter, 08:42
Re: Telescopes from Chiefland Star Party (images taken Nov. 18 & 19, 2006), Mike Simmons, 08:00
Re: Refractor Opinions Sought, laura halliday, 05:53
Re: Opinions on Meade truss-tube Dob?, Willie R . Meghar, 04:21
Mount compatibility, hitchcot, 03:53
Re: Refractor Opinions Sought, Rich, 02:11
Re: 7 Iris - an easy asteriod - is visible, canopus56, 02:10
Re: 7 Iris - an easy asteriod - is visible, canopus56, 02:08
Re: Bottle of Dark Matter?, Rich, 02:05
Re: Telescopes from Chiefland Star Party (images taken Nov. 18 & 19, 2006), RMOLLISE, 00:27
Re: Opinions on Meade truss-tube Dob?, Jan Owen, 00:16
Re: Telescopes from Chiefland Star Party (images taken Nov. 18 & 19, 2006), Jason H., 00:11

November 20, 2006

Re: Opinions on Meade truss-tube Dob?, Allan Mayer, 23:56
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Allan Mayer, 23:54
Re: Telescopes from Chiefland Star Party (images taken Nov. 18 & 19, 2006), RMOLLISE, 23:53
Re: Opinions on Meade truss-tube Dob?, RMOLLISE, 23:52
Opinions on Meade truss-tube Dob?, Rune Allnor, 23:40
Re: Stanford Hospital, William R. Mattil, 23:08
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Brian Tung, 22:21
Re: Telescopes from Chiefland Star Party (images taken Nov. 18 & 19, 2006), Allan Mayer, 22:15
Telescopes from Chiefland Star Party (images taken Nov. 18 & 19, 2006), Jason H., 22:06
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Michael McCulloch, 20:15
Dob Axis brake, captreed, 19:46
Re: Stanford Hospital, Chris L Peterson, 17:03
Re: question on universe, Mij Adyaw, 16:38
Re: Stanford Hospital, Mij Adyaw, 16:35
Re: Stanford Hospital, Davoud, 16:23
Re: 7 Iris - an easy asteriod - is visible, Michael Sisson, 15:45
Re: question on universe, oriel36, 12:31
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Brian Tung, 09:30
Re: 7 Iris - an easy asteriod - is visible, Paul Schlyter, 08:42
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, wsnell01, 07:34
7 Iris - an easy asteriod - is visible, canopus56, 07:29
Re: Stanford Hospital, lal_truckee, 06:49
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Brian Tung, 06:47
Stanford Hospital, Brian Tung, 06:43
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, wsnell01, 06:43
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Rich, 06:20
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Brian Tung, 05:41
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, wsnell01, 05:35
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Brian Tung, 05:00
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, wsnell01, 04:53
Re: Bottle of Dark Matter?, Shawn, 03:49
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Brian Tung, 01:58
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Chris L Peterson, 00:45
Re: Request for early obs of Leoniods, Carsten A. Arnholm, 00:31
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Paul Schlyter, 00:13

November 19, 2006

Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Chris L Peterson, 23:31
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, wsnell01, 22:51
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Brian Tung, 22:17
Re: Icy ProtoMoon, a Lithobreaking Arrival, Starlord, 22:02
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, thad, 22:01
Re: Request for early obs of Leoniods, Paul Schlyter, 21:43
Re: question on universe, Steve Sherman, 21:09
Re: Leonids, Starlord, 20:21
Filter Slide Options, Dennis Woos, 19:57
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Brian Tung, 19:16
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, wsnell01, 18:10
Re: Request for early obs of Leoniods, Pat O'Connell, 17:52
Re: Leonids, Feles, 17:44
Re: Leonids, Chris L Peterson, 17:26
Re: question on universe, Mark F., 17:23
Re: Leonids, Florian, 17:22
Re: Leonids, Feles, 17:07
Re: Bottle of Dark Matter?, Chris L Peterson, 16:58
Re: Bottle of Dark Matter?, west, 16:26
Re: question on universe, reconair, 15:55
Re: question on universe, Chris L Peterson, 15:52
Re: Request for early obs of Leoniods, Marty, 15:26
Re: Refractor Opinions Sought, wsnell01, 14:18
Re: Bottle of Dark Matter?, Pat, 13:44
Re: question on universe, Sam Wormley, 13:26
Re: question on universe, oriel36, 12:42
Re: Request for early obs of Leoniods, p . girard, 12:34
Re: You're *SORELY* Mistaken If..., Rick Evans, 12:11
Re: Request for early obs of Leoniods, canopus56, 11:05
Re: Request for early obs of Leoniods, Matthew Ota, 10:46
Re: Request for early obs of Leoniods, Paul Clark, 09:56
Re: Request for early obs of Leoniods, Paul Clark, 09:54
Re: Request for early obs of Leoniods, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx, 09:33
Re: question on universe, Brian Tung, 09:17
Re: question on universe, Chris L Peterson, 07:37
Re: Request for early obs of Leoniods, gubbenimanen, 07:18
Re: Request for early obs of Leoniods, p . girard, 07:15
question on universe, Eric, 06:47
Re: Request for early obs of Leoniods, gubbenimanen, 06:27
Re: Request for early obs of Leoniods, gubbenimanen, 06:22
Re: Bottle of Dark Matter?, Ambixious, 06:06
Re: New Images from this New Moon cycle, George, 05:39
Re: Request for early obs of Leoniods, George Normandin, 05:32
Re: Request for early obs of Leoniods, George, 04:09
Re: Request for early obs of Leoniods, Sjouke Burry, 03:50
Re: Request for early obs of Leoniods, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx, 03:23
Re: Refractor Opinions Sought, Sam Wormley, 03:03
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, starburst, 01:59
Re: Bottle of Dark Matter?, Ioannis, 01:21
Re: Bottle of Dark Matter?, starburst, 00:51
Request for early obs of Leoniods, canopus56, 00:22
Comet SWAN (friday night), Willie R . Meghar, 00:17
Re: widest FOW eyepiece on C5 w/o Redu.Cor. ?, Willie R . Meghar, 00:17
Re: Mercury Transit People Photos Wanted, Trane Francks, 00:02

November 18, 2006

Re: Bottle of Dark Matter?, Davoud, 23:09
New Images from this New Moon cycle, William R. Mattil, 22:43
Re: Bottle of Dark Matter?, Howard Lester, 22:31
Re: Bottle of Dark Matter?, Allan Mayer, 22:14
Re: Bottle of Dark Matter?, Joe S., 21:01
Re: Deep Sky Imager II Noise Reduction, Brian Tung, 18:25
Re: Deep Sky Imager II Noise Reduction, Chris L Peterson, 18:21
Re: widest FOW eyepiece on C5 w/o Redu.Cor. ?, William Hamblen, 18:01
Re: Deep Sky Imager II Noise Reduction, info, 18:00
For the Aussies & Kiwis, info, 17:53
Re: Deep Sky Imager II Noise Reduction, Chris L Peterson, 17:50
Re: Bottle of Dark Matter?, west, 17:47
Re: Deep Sky Imager II Noise Reduction, info, 17:40
Re: Brightest stars, past and future, Brian Tung, 17:29
Re: Detailed Look at Twin Asteroid 1999 KW4, Sam Wormley, 17:26
Detailed Look at Twin Asteroid 1999 KW4, Sam Wormley, 17:25
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Brian Tung, 17:20
Re: widest FOW eyepiece on C5 w/o Redu.Cor. ?, Brian Tung, 17:15
Re: Bottle of Dark Matter?, Brian Tung, 16:45
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Brian Tung, 16:44
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Chris L Peterson, 16:21
Re: Bottle of Dark Matter?, Davoud, 16:09
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, starburst, 16:05
widest FOW eyepiece on C5 w/o Redu.Cor. ?, Sixtus, 16:03
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, starburst, 15:38
Re: Bottle of Dark Matter?, Sam Wormley, 15:32
Re: Mercury Transit People Photos Wanted, Dave Jessie, 14:55
Re: My best Mercury transit shot so far, George, 13:01
A Theory of Everything: Geometric Generalization is updated, Erk.D, 12:46
Re: Mercury Transit People Photos Wanted, oriel36, 12:12
Re: Brightest stars, past and future, Paul Schlyter, 10:42
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Paul Schlyter, 10:42
Re: hai, Uncle Bob, 07:33
Re: Bottle of Dark Matter?, Chris L Peterson, 06:52
Bottle of Dark Matter?, west, 06:33
hai, para_mdu_88@xxxxxxxx, 06:22
SkyTonight.com's Weekly Bulletin - Nov 17, SJG, 05:05
Re: Black hole, Mark F., 04:59
Re: Celestron C 9-1/4 alignment issues, William Hamblen, 04:13
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Brian Tung, 01:35
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Brian Tung, 01:06

November 17, 2006

Re: Wanted: Volunteer to land on asteroid, nudge it away from Earth, Greg Crinklaw, 23:58
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Michael McCulloch, 23:44
Re: Mercury Transit People Photos Wanted, OG, 23:44
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Michael McCulloch, 23:39
Re: Wanted: Volunteer to land on asteroid, nudge it away from Earth, Sam Wormley, 23:23
Wanted: Volunteer to land on asteroid, nudge it away from Earth, Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names, 23:18
Re: Mercury Transit People Photos Wanted, oriel36, 22:53
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Jim Klein, 22:12
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Richard F.L.R.Snashall, 22:09
Re: Supernova Remnant Acts as a Particle Accelerator, Ioannis, 22:03
Re: Black hole, Ernie Dunbar, 21:56
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Chris L Peterson, 21:49
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Michael McCulloch, 21:27
Re: Supernova Remnant Acts as a Particle Accelerator, Ernie Dunbar, 21:26
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Don't Be Evil, 21:25
Mercury Transit People Photos Wanted, tony_flanders, 21:05
Re: Question re meteor showers, Morris Jones, 18:18
Re: Rosamond Report, Starlord, 16:29
Re: Leonids, Tom Polakis, 16:23
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Fred Scharmann, 13:36
Re: Rosamond Report, John Carruthers, 12:05
Re: Celestron C 9-1/4 alignment issues, Uncle Bob, 10:42
Re: Celestron C 9-1/4 alignment issues, Uncle Bob, 10:34
Re: Black hole, Trane Francks, 10:26
Re: Black hole, Norbert, 08:59
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, thad, 08:03
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Chris L Peterson, 07:06
Supernova Remnant Acts as a Particle Accelerator, Sam Wormley, 06:28
Re: Black hole, Brian Tung, 06:00
Re: Black hole, Sjouke Burry, 05:35
Re: Comet C/2006 M4 SWAN near Epsilon Aquilae, John Banister, 05:23
Re: New threat to Earth-based astronomy, Don't Be Evil, 05:19
Black hole, Mark F., 05:14
Comet C/2006 M4 SWAN near Epsilon Aquilae, Florian, 04:59
Re: Question re meteor showers, Chris L Peterson, 04:19
Question re meteor showers, Daniel Minge, 04:09
Re: For the Aussies, Al, 03:48
For the Aussies, Terry B, 01:04
Re: Brightest stars, past and future, Brian Tung, 00:29

November 16, 2006

Re: Leonids, Chris L Peterson, 23:34
Re: Brightest stars, past and future, Llanzlan Klazmon the 15th, 23:22
Re: Can anyone recommend a company to recoat a SCT secondary?, Jan Owen, 22:42
Palley Supply, Jim Klein, 22:15
Deep Sky Imager II Noise Reduction, Klaatu, 20:54
New threat to Earth-based astronomy, thad, 20:54
Re: Awards and Dammed ;}, Starlord, 19:47
Re: Can anyone recommend a company to recoat a SCT secondary?, AM, 18:49
Re: Awards and Dammed ;}, dk, 17:55
Re: Can anyone recommend a company to recoat a SCT secondary?, lal_truckee, 17:53
Re: ATTENTION Daniel Min, Starlord, 17:52
Re: Can anyone recommend a company to recoat a SCT secondary?, cboscari, 17:43
Re: Forgiveness and Christianity, AM, 16:21
Re: Can anyone recommend a company to recoat a SCT secondary?, AM, 16:18
Re: Brightest stars, past and future, allisonki, 15:05
Re: Celestron C 9-1/4 alignment issues, Roger Hamlett, 11:57
Re: Celestron C 9-1/4 alignment issues, Bull Feathers, 11:06
Re: Can anyone recommend a company to recoat a SCT secondary?, Bull Feathers, 10:58
Re: Can anyone recommend a company to recoat a SCT secondary?, Bull Feathers, 10:49
update my web page, giorgio mengoli, 10:02
Re: Celestron C 9-1/4 alignment issues, Uncle Bob, 08:57
Re: ATTENTION Daniel Min, G.T., 08:49
Re: Awards and Dammed ;}, Starlord, 08:21
Re: Brightest stars, past and future, Sam Wormley, 07:50
Re: This is a time question; I'll bet (Einstein) didn't know about laser pointers, Mike Ruskai, 07:29
Re: Brightest stars, past and future, Robert Welch, 07:21
Re: Awards and Dammed ;}, Eric, 07:07
Re: Brightest stars, past and future, Sam Wormley, 06:44
Re: Brightest stars, past and future, Mij Adyaw, 05:53
Re: Brightest stars, past and future, Sam Wormley, 05:12
Re: Celestron C 9-1/4 alignment issues, Dan Spisak, 05:03
ALERT: Geomagnetic K-index of 5, Sam Wormley, 04:44
Brightest stars, past and future, allisonki, 04:17
Celestron C 9-1/4 alignment issues, Uncle Bob, 02:55
Re: Awards and Dammed ;}, Starlord, 02:51
Re: Can anyone recommend a company to recoat a SCT secondary?, Uncle Bob, 02:22
Re: Awards and Dammed ;}, Patrick Edward Murray, 01:55
Awards and Dammed ;}, Starlord, 00:30
Re: Green Moonlight, Starlord, 00:24

November 15, 2006

Re: Green Moonlight, TBerk, 23:36
Re: Big Bertha Thing blogs, Tony Lance, 14:00
Re: My best Mercury transit shot so far, Chatter Nougat Chew-Chew, 12:10
Re: Rosamond Report, Pat, 10:25
Re: Can anyone recommend a company to recoat a SCT secondary?, William Hamblen, 02:58
Re: Can anyone recommend a company to recoat a SCT secondary?, Phil Wheeler, 02:30
Old Astronomy Books/Trade for 4 inch short tube Refractor with EQ mount, The Q, 02:26
Re: Can anyone recommend a company to recoat a SCT secondary?, Jan Owen, 01:38
Re: Can anyone recommend a company to recoat a SCT secondary?, Rich, 01:34
Re: Can anyone recommend a company to recoat a SCT secondary?, cboscari, 01:13
Re: Can anyone recommend a company to recoat a SCT secondary?, Jan Owen, 00:42
Re: Can anyone recommend a company to recoat a SCT secondary?, cboscari, 00:15

November 14, 2006

Re: Can anyone recommend a company to recoat a SCT secondary?, Jan Owen, 23:20
Re: Can anyone recommend a company to recoat a SCT secondary?, Beta Persei, 23:17
Can anyone recommend a company to recoat a SCT secondary?, cboscari, 22:57
Re: NASA Loses Contact With Mars Global Surveyor, Jim Klein, 22:00
Re: Canon DSLR's, nytecam, 21:16
Re: This is a time question; I'll bet (Einstein) didn't know about laser pointers, Starlord, 19:59
Re: Rosamond Report, Starlord, 19:57
Re: This is a time question; I'll bet (Einstein) didn't know about laser pointers, Brian Tung, 19:51
Re: Rosamond Report, nozzo, 19:10
Re: This is a time question; I'll bet (Einstein) didn't know about laser pointers, Sam Wormley, 16:53
This is a time question; I'll bet (Einstein) didn't know about laser pointers, esmartguy, 16:47
Re: Leonids, Tom Polakis, 15:29
Re: Leonids, canopus56, 10:24
Re: Leonids, canopus56, 10:15
Re: Leonids, George Normandin, 05:52
Re: Polar Alignment using Digital Setting Circles, George Normandin, 05:35
Re: Ping Decatur Tx astronomers, JM, 04:22
Ping Decatur Tx astonomers, JM, 04:15
Re: Canon DSLR's, Rich, 02:18

November 13, 2006

Re: Leonids, Paul Schlyter, 23:43
Re: Leonids, Chris L Peterson, 23:23
Leonids, Algomeysa2, 23:05
Re: Restricted ASCII?, Starlord, 19:44
Re: NASA Loses Contact With Mars Global Surveyor, Mij Adyaw, 19:11
Re: MGS conks out, Starry_American, 17:45
Re: Canon DSLR's, Chris L Peterson, 16:31
Canon DSLR's, Protagonist, 10:54
Re: Winter solstice, Nikolaj, 09:47
Re: Winter solstice, Paul Schlyter, 08:42
Re: Off Topic: This I post on Nov.11th, Starlord, 04:35
Re: Off Topic: This I post on Nov.11th, Pat O'Connell, 03:57
Re: DIY eyecaps for eyepieces?, lal_truckee, 01:17

November 12, 2006

Re: How to drive a Phillips Toucam Pro, Pat, 23:50
Re: Winter solstice, MIN PhD, 23:49
Re: Winter solstice, Llanzlan Klazmon the 15th, 22:42
Re: Off Topic: This I post on Nov.11th, Starlord, 22:28
Re: Winter solstice, SkySea, 22:09
DIY eyecaps for eyepieces?, Sixtus, 21:17
Re: Winter solstice, Nikolaj, 20:29
Re: Winter solstice, Sam Wormley, 20:10
Rosamond Report, Starlord, 20:07
Winter solstice, Nikolaj, 20:02
Re: Off Topic: This I post on Nov.11th, kapella1, 20:02
Naked-Eye Sunspot, Willie R . Meghar, 19:35
Re: NASA Loses Contact With Mars Global Surveyor, Patrick Edward Murray, 18:18
Re: CO people, Patrick Edward Murray, 18:16
Re: NASA Loses Contact With Mars Global Surveyor, Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names, 14:01
A new one, HoO_Germany, 13:07
Re: Stunning!, HeyJP, 08:57
Re: NASA Loses Contact With Mars Global Surveyor, Restless Cow Syndrome, 08:46
Re: Off Topic: This I post on Nov.11th, Curtis Croulet, 07:57
Stunning!, Loser, 07:27
CO people, Loser, 06:55
very mercurial, Loser, 06:50
Re: NASA Loses Contact With Mars Global Surveyor, Loser, 06:46
Re: NASA Loses Contact With Mars Global Surveyor, Rich, 06:34
NASA Loses Contact With Mars Global Surveyor, Sam Wormley, 04:53
Re: Off Topic: This I post on Nov.11th, rpasken, 04:30
Re: MGS conks out, Chris L Peterson, 01:03
Re: MGS conks out, Loser, 00:51
Re: MGS conks out, Loser, 00:49
Re: MGS conks out, Trane Francks, 00:02

November 11, 2006

Re: MGS conks out, Starlord, 23:52
Re: MGS conks out, Greg Crinklaw, 23:06
Re: The tread of choice, Joe S., 23:03
Re: MGS conks out, T . Bloompaster Weatherford, 21:58
Re: MGS conks out, Chris L Peterson, 21:42
Re: Off Topic: This I post on Nov.11th, Starlord, 21:34
Re: MGS conks out, T . Bloompaster Weatherford, 21:32
Re: Off Topic: This I post on Nov.11th, rpasken, 21:20
Re: The tread of choice, Chris L Peterson, 21:17
Re: The tread of choice, Loser, 21:12
Off Topic: This I post on Nov.11th, Starlord, 20:35
Re: The tread of choice, Chris L Peterson, 20:20
Re: MGS conks out, Chris L Peterson, 20:19
Re: Positions of the constellations in relation to astrology?, Uncle Bob, 20:19
Re: MGS conks out, Loser, 20:15
Re: MGS conks out, Greg Crinklaw, 19:53
Re: Sodom's Cinders, Igor, 19:47
Re: The tread of choice, HeyJP, 19:42
Re: The tread of choice, Loser, 19:25
Re: MGS conks out, Loser, 19:23
Re: MGS conks out, Loser, 19:22
Re: MGS conks out, Chris L Peterson, 18:45
Re: MGS conks out, Greg Crinklaw, 18:45
Re: The tread of choice, Chris L Peterson, 18:43
MGS conks out, Loser, 18:33
Re: The tread of choice, Loser, 18:31
Re: The tread of choice, HeyJP, 18:08
Re: Positions of the constellations in relation to astrology?, AM, 14:33
Re: 911 -- Conspiracy Fatigue, AM, 14:31
As a geologist, Loser, 07:18
The tread of choice, Loser, 04:18
Re: Polar Alignment using Digital Setting Circles, Loser, 04:13
Re: The End is Near!, Jim Klein, 01:41
Re: Polar Alignment using Digital Setting Circles, Brian Tung, 01:28
Re: Positions of the constellations in relation to astrology?, AM, 01:07
Galactic Building Block Busters, Sam Wormley, 00:59

November 10, 2006

Re: Polar Alignment using Digital Setting Circles, Mark Gingrich, 21:41
Re: Polar Alignment using Digital Setting Circles, Mark Gingrich, 21:33
Re: cluster questions, canopus56, 19:26
Re: Polar Alignment using Digital Setting Circles, HeyJP, 18:44
Re: Polar Alignment using Digital Setting Circles, HeyJP, 18:34
Re: cluster questions, Sam Wormley, 17:29
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, laura halliday, 17:12
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, Willie R . Meghar, 17:00
Re: ?fading Swan?, Willie R . Meghar, 17:00
cluster questions, brucegooglegroups, 16:20
Re: Perfect Day in SoCal for Mercury Transit, Tom Polakis, 16:11
ALERT: Geomagnetic K-index of 6, Sam Wormley, 15:55
Re: Polar Alignment using Digital Setting Circles, Chris L Peterson, 15:22
Re: ALERT: Geomagnetic K-index of 5, oriel36, 14:04
Re: Polar Alignment using Digital Setting Circles, Rick Evans, 13:11
Re: Sodom's Cinders, Double-A, 09:10
Re: Polar Alignment using Digital Setting Circles, HeyJP, 07:56
Re: Sodom's Cinders, Dr Min PhD, 07:52
Re: Polar Alignment using Digital Setting Circles, HeyJP, 07:48
Re: Polar Alignment using Digital Setting Circles, Terry B, 07:46
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, Uncle Bob, 07:44
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, Uncle Bob, 07:29
Re: ?fading Swan?, Uncle Bob, 07:24
Re: Sodom's Cinders, Dr Min PhD, 07:19
Re: Polar Alignment using Digital Setting Circles, Loser, 07:13
Re: cooling an observatory in summer heat, Martin Brown, 07:07
ALERT: Geomagnetic K-index of 5, Sam Wormley, 06:17
Re: Polar Alignment using Digital Setting Circles, Mark Gingrich, 06:07
Re: Polar Alignment using Digital Setting Circles, Brian Tung, 06:01
Re: Sodom's Cinders, james, 05:22
Re: Where is Mr Oriel?, Mij Adyaw, 05:15
Re: Polar Alignment using Digital Setting Circles, AM, 05:04
Re: My best Mercury transit shot so far, John Nichols, 04:17
Re: Scopetronix defunct?, Archteryx, 04:12
Re: Where is Mr Oriel?, Loser, 03:17
Re: Monthly Park Astronomy, Starlord, 02:29
Vintage Telescope Making manual 1905 FA, JaneyP, 02:03
Re: Polar Alignment using Digital Setting Circles, HeyJP, 02:02
Re: Polar Alignment using Digital Setting Circles, HeyJP, 01:58
WARNING: Geomagnetic K-index of 5 expected, Sam Wormley, 01:33
Re: Polar Alignment using Digital Setting Circles, Llanzlan Klazmon the 15th, 01:31
Re: Polar Alignment using Digital Setting Circles, Llanzlan Klazmon the 15th, 01:27
Re: Mercury Transit, Brian Tung, 00:51
Re: Is an observatory worth building if your telescopes are not mounted on piers?, Bob G ., 00:40
Re: Green Laser Pointer, Bob G ., 00:14
Re: cooling an observatory in summer heat, Bob G ., 00:08
Re: Where is Mr Oriel?, Greg Crinklaw, 00:00

November 09, 2006

Re: Polar Alignment using Digital Setting Circles, AstroApp ., 22:55
Re: Polar Alignment using Digital Setting Circles, AstroApp ., 22:54
Re: Sodom's Cinders, Llanzlan Klazmon the 15th, 22:39
Polar Alignment using Digital Setting Circles, HeyJP, 22:30
Re: Monthly Park Astronomy, Patrick Edward Murray, 21:53
Re: This One's for You, Danny Min, Loser, 20:49
Monthly Park Astronomy, Starlord, 20:42
Re: Sodom's Cinders, AustinMN, 20:20
Re: My best Mercury transit shot so far, AstroApp ., 20:02
Re: Mercury Transit, Mij Adyaw, 19:51
Re: My best Mercury transit shot so far, David Nakamoto, 19:50
Re: Where is Mr Oriel?, Mij Adyaw, 19:48
Re: Perfect Day in SoCal for Mercury Transit, David Nakamoto, 19:47
Re: The End is Near!, Mij Adyaw, 19:44
Re: Where is Mr Oriel?, Mij Adyaw, 19:44
Re: Mercury Transit, Brian Tung, 19:24
Re: Perfect Day in SoCal for Mercury Transit, Robert Sheaffer, 17:56
Re: Perfect Day in SoCal for Mercury Transit, Starlord, 17:46
Re: Virtual Moon New version 3.5, Starlord, 17:40
Re: Scopetronix defunct?, gbot, 16:43
Virtual Moon New version 3.5, Philippe HAAKE, 14:35
Re: Where is Mr Oriel?, oriel36, 13:41
Re: Where is Mr Oriel?, oriel36, 13:28
Mercury passes the Earth's heliocentric orbital position, oriel36, 13:02
Re: Where is Mr Oriel?, John Carruthers, 12:38
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, Trane Francks, 08:28
Re: My best Mercury transit shot so far, Rob Johnson, 07:42
Re: My best Mercury transit shot so far, Pat O'Connell, 07:21
Re: Mercury Transit, David Knisely, 07:07
Re: Perfect Day in SoCal for Mercury Transit, Curtis Croulet, 07:02
Re: Astro Limerick--Fraknoi, Uncle Bob, 06:58
Re: cooling an observatory in summer heat, JM, 06:31
Re: Perfect Day in SoCal for Mercury Transit, David Nakamoto, 06:30
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, Curtis Croulet, 05:57
Re: My best Mercury transit shot so far, George, 05:55
Killer Solar Flare... on Another Star, Sam Wormley, 05:31
Sodom's Cinders, Shawn, 05:30
Re: Mercury Transit - HOT!, Starlord, 05:29
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, Starlord, 05:27
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, Starlord, 05:27
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, John Banister, 05:21
Re: Mercury Transit, John Banister, 05:15
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, Curtis Croulet, 04:42
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, Mij Adyaw, 04:09
Re: clear skies and Mercury, Marty, 04:08
Re: So much for Mercury....., Mij Adyaw, 04:01
Re: Perfect Day in SoCal for Mercury Transit, Mij Adyaw, 03:59
Re: My best Mercury transit shot so far, Mij Adyaw, 03:55
Re: clear skies and Mercury, David G. Nagel, 03:53
Re: First results, Mercury transit digital image: now posted, Patrick Edward Murray, 03:48
Re: clear skies and Mercury, Tim Oltrogge, 03:20
Re: So much for Mercury....., Terry B, 02:52
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, Al, 02:44
Re: My best Mercury transit shot so far, Fred, 02:34
Re: Mercury Transit - HOT!, Florian, 02:08
Re: So much for Mercury....., Rich, 01:58
Re: Perfect Day in SoCal for Mercury Transit, Curtis Croulet, 01:51
Re: clear skies and Mercury, Marty, 01:45
Re: First results, Mercury transit digital image: now posted, Regina Roper, 01:36
Re: Newtonian focuser diameter to avoid vignetting, Dennis Woos, 01:20
Re: clear skies and Mercury, Marty, 01:11
Re: First results, Mercury transit digital image: now posted, Regina Roper, 01:09
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, Trane Francks, 00:59
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, Craig M . Bobchin, 00:47
Re: Perfect Day in SoCal for Mercury Transit, Matthew Ota, 00:46
Re: Perfect Day in SoCal for Mercury Transit, Craig M . Bobchin, 00:23
First results, Mercury transit digital image: now posted, Regina Roper, 00:14
Re: My best Mercury transit shot so far, brdavis, 00:09
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, brdavis, 00:07
Re: clear skies and Mercury, RAMangold, 00:03
Re: clear skies and Mercury, Curtis Croulet, 00:02

November 08, 2006

Re: Newtonian focuser diameter to avoid vignetting, wsnell01, 23:30
Re: Newtonian focuser diameter to avoid vignetting, William R. Mattil, 23:27
Opinions about Outman & Hanimex binoculars?, xxx73, 23:09
Re: clear skies and Mercury, Tim Oltrogge, 23:04
Re: Mercury Transit - HOT!, Anthony Ayiomamitis, 22:52
Re: So much for Mercury....., Sam Wormley, 22:28
Newtonian focuser diameter to avoid vignetting, renenkel, 22:27
Re: Mercury Transit, Brian Tung, 22:26
Re: My best Mercury transit shot so far, George, 22:25
Re: Perfect Day in SoCal for Mercury Transit, laura halliday, 22:15
So much for Mercury....., Rich, 22:12
Re: clear skies and Mercury, Marty, 22:04
Mercury Transit, John Banister, 21:55
Re: Perfect Day in SoCal for Mercury Transit, Phil Wheeler, 21:52
Re: clear skies and Mercury, Starlord, 21:35
Re: Green Moonlight, Starlord, 21:34
Mercury Transit - HOT!, RAMangold, 21:29
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, Sam Wormley, 21:18
Re: Green Moonlight, Patrick Edward Murray, 21:15
Re: My best Mercury transit shot so far, Gareth Slee, 21:14
My best Mercury transit shot so far, Matthew Ota, 21:01
Re: clear skies and Mercury, Loser, 21:01
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, Loser, 21:00
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, Mij Adyaw, 20:47
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, Starlord, 20:43
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, Sam Wormley, 20:38
Mercury transit - webcasts and near-real time static images, canopus56, 20:02
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, Mij Adyaw, 19:55
Re: Perfect Day in SoCal for Mercury Transit, Mij Adyaw, 19:53
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, laura halliday, 19:52
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, Mij Adyaw, 19:37
cooling an observatory in summer heat, Ray Porter, 19:33
Re: ATTENTION Daniel Min, Mij Adyaw, 19:27
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, Starlord, 19:19
Re: Perfect Day in SoCal for Mercury Transit, Brian Tung, 19:17
clear skies and Mercury, Loser, 19:15
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, Loser, 19:14
Re: Perfect Day in SoCal for Mercury Transit, John Banister, 18:48
Re: Perfect Day in SoCal for Mercury Transit, Mij Adyaw, 18:21
Re: ATTENTION Daniel Min, Odd Bob, 17:39
Re: Perfect Day in SoCal for Mercury Transit, Starlord, 17:37
Re: OT: A Mercurial Dedication To George W., Odd Bob, 17:36
Re: ATTENTION Daniel Min, Shawn, 17:33
Perfect Day in SoCal for Mercury Transit, Matthew Ota, 17:32
Re: This One's for You, Danny Min, Greg Crinklaw, 17:10
Where is Mr Oriel?, Mij Adyaw, 17:00
Re: ATTENTION Daniel Min, Mij Adyaw, 16:51
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, oriel36, 16:22
Re: microscope binocular heads any good for telescopes?, tedkord, 15:50
Re: This One's for You, Danny Min, richard schumacher, 15:47
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, Sam Wormley, 15:18
OT: A Mercurial Dedication To George W., Shawn, 15:12
Unmasked Vesta, tontoko, 14:09
Camera world's version of "What power is it?", Rich, 13:40
Re: ATTENTION Daniel Min, Anthony Ayiomamitis, 13:27
ATTENTION Daniel Min, Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names, 13:22
Re: To Dr Pasken , Dept of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, SLU, tom, 13:06
Re: Is an observatory worth building if your telescopes are not mounted on piers?, nytecam, 12:53
This One's for You, Danny Min, Davoud, 12:52
Re: 100 Years of E=mc2, sur, 11:30
Re: pier design, Chris.B, 11:04
Re: pier design, slove_jack2007, 10:15
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, Paul Schlyter, 08:42
?fading Swan?, Dave, 06:45
Re: To Dr Pasken , Dept of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, SLU, rpasken, 05:56
Re: pier design, Davoud, 04:38
Re: Is an observatory worth building if your telescopes are not mounted on piers?, Jim Klein, 03:36
Re: Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, Sam Wormley, 03:10
100 Years of E=mc2, tom, 03:10
Re: To Dr Pasken , Dept of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, SLU, tom, 03:06
Transit of Mercury--The only chance you will ever get!, Sam Wormley, 01:50
Re: Projecting the Mercury Transit Onto Cardboard, wsnell01, 01:40
Re: microscope binocular heads any good for telescopes?, Luca, 01:04
Re: microscope binocular heads any good for telescopes?, RMOLLISE, 00:56
pier design, Tater, 00:48
Re: Is an observatory worth building if your telescopes are not mounted on piers?, Tater, 00:44
microscope binocular heads any good for telescopes?, Luca, 00:44
Re: Projecting the Mercury Transit Onto Cardboard, W. Watson, 00:25

November 07, 2006

Re: Green Moonlight, Ioannis, 23:58
Re: Green Moonlight, Fred Scharmann, 23:48
Re: Green Moonlight, Ioannis, 23:26
Re: Is an observatory worth building if your telescopes are not mounted on piers?, David G. Nagel, 23:19
Re: Green Moonlight, Howard Lester, 23:11
Re: Is an observatory worth building if your telescopes are not mounted on piers?, AM, 23:03
Re: Mercury Transit, AM, 23:00
Re: What is SOHO C3 showing now?, Florian, 22:39
What is SOHO C3 showing now?, Florian, 22:35
Projecting the Mercury Transit Onto Cardboard, W. Watson, 22:34
Re: Is an observatory worth building if your telescopes are not mounted on piers?, Joe S., 22:03
Re: Mercury Transit, Greg Crinklaw, 21:49
Re: Is an observatory worth building if your telescopes are not mounted on piers?, Ernie Dunbar, 21:11
Re: Green Moonlight, Ernie Dunbar, 21:03
Re: Question: Celestron, Tom, 20:54
Re: Is an observatory worth building if your telescopes are not mounted on piers?, Starlord, 20:37
Re: Mercury Transit, robert casey, 20:21
Re: Is an observatory worth building if your telescopes are not mounted on piers?, whowell, 18:39
Re: Question: Celestron, Brian Tung, 18:27
Re: Is an observatory worth building if your telescopes are not mounted on piers?, David G. Nagel, 18:22
Re: Green Moonlight, Starlord, 18:08
Re: Mercury Transit, AM, 17:58
Re: Question: Celestron, Michael McCulloch, 17:08
Re: Green Moonlight, Phil Wheeler, 16:28
Re: To Dr Pasken , Dept of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, SLU, ma, 16:08
Re: Is an observatory worth building if your telescopes are not mounted on piers?, Joe S., 15:56
Green Moonlight, Starlord, 15:54
Re: Question: Celestron, AM, 14:16
Re: Is an observatory worth building if your telescopes are not mounted on piers?, Davoud, 12:44
Re: Question: Celestron, Trane Francks, 10:45
Mercury to cross Sun, I_am_the_best_breather_everr, 09:50
Re: Is an observatory worth building if your telescopes are not mounted on piers?, Starlord, 06:10
Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), zzz, 04:39
Is an observatory worth building if your telescopes are not mounted on piers?, allisonki, 03:14
Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, AJAY SHARMA, 02:46
Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, tgm, 02:41
Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, karandash2000, 01:35
Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), zzz, 01:31
Re: Mercury Transit, RAMangold, 01:25

November 06, 2006

Re: HEQ5 synscan V2.5 won't modify rate, RMOLLISE, 23:23
Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, rpasken, 23:22
SpaceBuffs.com Forum, smashinyoungman, 23:21
Re: Current forecast for Wednesday's Mercury Transit, Joe S., 23:12
Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, karandash2000, 22:53
Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, karandash2000, 22:51
Re: Rosamond Report, Gareth Slee, 21:45
Mercury Transit, AM, 21:37
Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), zzz, 20:34
Re: M1 - Crab Nebula in Taurus, Graham W, 20:21
Re: Griffith Observatory, Jim Klein, 20:13
Rosamond Report, Starlord, 19:58
Re: Griffith Observatory, Jim Klein, 19:57
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, Jim Klein, 19:55
Re: Current forecast for Wednesday's Mercury Transit, John Banister, 18:57
Current forecast for Wednesday's Mercury Transit, Matthew Ota, 18:30
Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Ben Rudiak-Gould, 18:22
Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Ben Rudiak-Gould, 18:04
Re: Off Topic: Film Lab, laura halliday, 17:37
Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, Wayne Throop, 17:03
Re: Dream Secrets Revealed, Starlord, 16:34
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, AM, 15:30
Re: To Dr Pasken , Dept of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, SLU, AJAY SHARMA, 15:05
Re: M1 - Crab Nebula in Taurus, Thierry, 14:26
Re: M1 - Crab Nebula in Taurus, Thierry, 13:59
Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, AJAY SHARMA, 13:04
HEQ5 synscan V2.5 won't modify rate, pascal, 09:57
Re: Introducing the Virtual Telescope: first images., jerry warner, 09:47
Re: Off Topic: Film Lab, jerry warner, 09:45
Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Phil Carmody, 08:57
Re: Griffith Observatory, Matthew Ota, 08:11
Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), zzz, 08:05
Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, Proginoskes, 07:09
Hawaii Star Party Pizza, Starlord, 07:00
Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Ben Rudiak-Gould, 06:33
Re: Thank you, Eugene Griessel, 06:32
Re: neptun, Mark Gingrich, 06:14
Re: Off Topic: Film Lab, Starlord, 05:59
Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), jsavard, 03:47
Re: Homemade solar filter for TV76, Florian, 03:33
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, Jim Klein, 03:22
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, T . Bloompaster Weatherford, 02:51
To Dr Pasken , Dept of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, SLU, AJAY SHARMA, 02:41
Re: sci.astro.amateur, sci.space.policy, alt.sci.planetary, AJAY SHARMA, 02:37
Re: sci.astro.amateur, sci.space.policy, alt.sci.planetary, AJAY SHARMA, 02:33
Re: neptun, RMOLLISE, 01:53
Re: Off Topic: Film Lab, Richard Amirault, 00:31

November 05, 2006

KDP-2, Jim Klein, 23:04
Re: Vatican & Dalai Lama bless SETI, Jim Klein, 22:48
Re: Vatican & Dalai Lama bless SETI, Phil Wheeler, 22:24
Re: neptune, Thierry, 22:18
neptun, bobby, 22:15
neptun, bobby, 22:15
neptun, bobby, 22:15
neptun, bobby, 22:15
neptune, bobby, 22:15
Re: Sci.space.news What happened?, Patrick Edward Murray, 21:51
Homemade solar filter for TV76, Florian, 21:43
Re: Green Laser Pointer, Florian, 20:23
Re: Solar eyepiece projection safe for scope?, wsnell01, 20:23
Vatican & Dalai Lama bless SETI, Bruno Moretti IK2WQA, 20:21
Re: sci.astro.amateur, sci.space.policy, alt.sci.planetary, wsnell01, 19:54
Re: M1 - Crab Nebula in Taurus, Frank Feger, 19:43
Re: Solar eyepiece projection safe for scope?, Mij Adyaw, 19:35
Re: Top Tips, Greg Crinklaw, 19:32
Re: Solar eyepiece projection safe for scope?, Mij Adyaw, 19:27
Re: sci.astro.amateur, sci.space.policy, alt.sci.planetary, rpasken, 18:58
Re: Question: Celestron, Michael McCulloch, 18:48
Re: sci.astro.amateur, sci.space.policy, alt.sci.planetary, AJAY SHARMA, 18:14
Re: sci.astro.amateur, sci.space.policy, alt.sci.planetary, Dono, 17:15
Re: Sci.space.news What happened?, Mark F., 17:08
Re: sci.astro.amateur, sci.space.policy, alt.sci.planetary, Rick Evans, 17:02
Re: Top Tips, Tater, 15:48
From Russia with Love, jt, 15:46
Re: Introducing the Virtual Telescope: first images., Sam Wormley, 14:21
Introducing the Virtual Telescope: first images., gianluca, 12:24
Re: A Crab from polluted waters, Johnny Borborigmi, 12:09
Re: M1 - Crab Nebula in Taurus, Thierry, 11:53
Re: sci.astro.amateur, sci.space.policy, alt.sci.planetary, AJAY SHARMA, 10:52
Re: sci.astro.amateur, sci.space.policy, alt.sci.planetary, fakfondo, 10:40
Re: sci.astro.amateur, sci.space.policy, alt.sci.planetary, fakfondo, 10:29
Re: M1 - Crab Nebula in Taurus, Odysseus, 10:06
Re: A Crab from polluted waters, Norbert, 10:04
Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, AJAY SHARMA, 09:53
Re: sci.astro.amateur, sci.space.policy, alt.sci.planetary, Impeach Bush, 09:15
Re: sci.astro.amateur, sci.space.policy, alt.sci.planetary, Impeach Bush, 09:14
Re: Mercury Transit Contact Points, VicXnews, 08:47
Re: Re: Nameless critics on the Internet and critical analysis of Einsteinâs E=mc2, Uncle Bob, 08:29
Re: Off Topic: Film Lab, Starlord, 08:24
Re: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, Proginoskes, 07:59
Re: Mercury Transit Contact Points, Uncle Bob, 07:58
Re: Off Topic: Film Lab, Mark F., 07:14
A Crab from polluted waters, William R. Mattil, 05:33
Mercury Transit Contact Points, RAMangold, 04:26
Re: sci.astro.amateur, sci.space.policy, alt.sci.planetary, Sjouke Burry, 04:12
Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Brian Tung, 01:07
Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), jsavard, 00:42

November 04, 2006

Re: Sci.space.news What happened?, Patrick Edward Murray, 22:27
Re: sci.astro.amateur, sci.space.policy, alt.sci.planetary, Jan Owen, 21:17
Re: sci.astro.amateur, sci.space.policy, alt.sci.planetary, RMOLLISE, 20:52
Re: sci.astro.amateur, sci.space.policy, alt.sci.planetary, rpasken, 20:47
Re: slr camera advice, Protagonist, 20:44
Re: sci.astro.amateur, sci.space.policy, alt.sci.planetary, David Knisely, 19:49
Re: Question: Celestron, goodnigh, 19:30
Re: Spirit on Mars 'McMurdo' panorama, Bill Cotten, 18:46
Re: Sci.space.news What happened?, William Hamblen, 17:42
Re: sci.astro.amateur, sci.space.policy, alt.sci.planetary, AJAY SHARMA, 17:41
Re: M1 - Crab Nebula in Taurus, Thierry, 17:19
Re: M1 - Crab Nebula in Taurus, Brian Tung, 17:11
Re: Sci.space.news What happened?, Matthew Ota, 17:03
Re: Sci.space.news What happened?, RMOLLISE, 16:26
Re: sci.astro.amateur, sci.space.policy, alt.sci.planetary, RMOLLISE, 16:16
sci.astro.amateur, sci.space.policy, alt.sci.planetary, AJAY SHARMA, 16:05
Re: Barry's home_made observatory, Barry, 15:59
Re: Question: Celestron, Bob G ., 15:51
Re: Astro Limerick--Fraknoi, Sam Wormley, 14:59
Re: M1 - Crab Nebula in Taurus, Anthony Ayiomamitis, 13:38
Re: Astro Limerick--Fraknoi, W. Watson, 13:27
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity, AJAY SHARMA, 13:27
Re: Solar eyepiece projection safe for scope?, wsnell01, 12:45
An astronomical countdown, oriel36, 12:22
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, wsnell01, 12:20
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, Rich, 09:43
Re: Sci.space.news What happened?, jpo, 08:32
Re: Sci.space.news What happened?, jpo, 08:29
Re: Off Topic: Film Lab, Ameri-Sleaze, 07:59
Re: Off Topic: Film Lab, Ameri-Sleaze, 07:58
Re: Sci.space.news What happened?, Patrick Edward Murray, 06:25
Re: Imaging ISS crossing the Moon, Kruger Kid, 05:39
Re: Solar eyepiece projection safe for scope?, William Hamblen, 04:51
Re: Solar eyepiece projection safe for scope?, Florian, 03:28
Re: Question: Celestron, RMOLLISE, 03:16
Re: M1 - Crab Nebula in Taurus, Thierry, 02:39
Re: Question: Celestron, goodnigh, 02:29
Re: M1 - Crab Nebula in Taurus, Thierry, 02:23
Re: Question: Celestron, RMOLLISE, 02:09
Re: M1 - Crab Nebula in Taurus, Philippe Delsol, 02:05
Question: Celestron, goodnigh, 01:16
Re: Sci.space.news What happened?, RMOLLISE, 01:02
Sci.space.news What happened?, Patrick Edward Murray, 00:57
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, Chris.B, 00:35
SkyTonight.com's Weekly Bulletin - Nov 3, SJG, 00:26
Re: Off Topic: Film Lab, Starlord, 00:17

November 03, 2006

Re: December 1964 S&T image needed, Les Blalock, 23:44
Re: Imaging ISS crossing the Moon, Anthony Ayiomamitis, 23:20
Re: Off Topic: Film Lab, Mike Simmons, 22:23
Re: Off Topic: Film Lab, Starlord, 22:22
Re: December 1964 S&T image needed, AstroApp ., 21:02
Re: Off Topic: Film Lab, Howard Lester, 20:51
Re: Off Topic: Film Lab, RMOLLISE, 20:47
Re: Linux Astronomy Program ?, nick, 20:37
December 1964 S&T image needed, Les Blalock, 20:30
Re: Imaging ISS crossing the Moon, tony_flanders, 20:23
Re: Off Topic: Film Lab, lal_truckee, 20:18
Re: Imaging ISS crossing the Moon, Gareth Slee, 20:07
Imaging ISS crossing the Moon, Matthew D. Mills, 20:06
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, AustinMN, 19:48
Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Brian Tung, 19:23
Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Brian Tung, 19:10
Re: Solar eyepiece projection safe for scope?, Brian Tung, 19:08
Re: Off Topic: Film Lab, Starlord, 18:32
Re: Off Topic: Film Lab, RMOLLISE, 18:05
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, Bert Hyman, 17:12
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, Davoud, 17:01
Re: Solar eyepiece projection safe for scope?, Alan French, 14:56
Re: Telescopes and Great Pyrenees, Don't Be Evil, 14:44
Registax4 and Iris5: lunar images, Giorgio Mengoli, 14:37
Re: Spirit on Mars 'McMurdo' panorama, Bob Schmall, 14:36
Re: Nameless critics on the Internet and critical analysis of Einsteinâs E=mc2, AJAY SHARMA, 13:43
Re: Off Topic: Film Lab, Goshen, 09:17
Telescope donation, KrunoG, 08:12
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, Goshen, 08:08
Re: Telescopes and Great Pyrenees, Mike Simmons, 07:14
Re: Off Topic: Film Lab, laura halliday, 06:01
Telescopes and Great Pyrenees, Walt, 05:53
Off Topic: Film Lab, Starlord, 05:01
Re: Solar eyepiece projection safe for scope?, Starlord, 04:57
Re: Solar eyepiece projection safe for scope?, RMOLLISE, 04:31
Re: Current Magnitude, Moe M. Down, 03:52
Re: Solar eyepiece projection safe for scope?, Mark D, 02:55
Solar eyepiece projection safe for scope?, Florian, 02:42
Re: Spirit on Mars 'McMurdo' panorama, Davoud, 00:50
Re: Griffith Observatory, Jim Klein, 00:34
Re: Astrophotography, Johnny Borborigmi, 00:28

November 02, 2006

Re: Spirit on Mars 'McMurdo' panorama, AustinMN, 22:53
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, AustinMN, 22:50
Re: Spirit on Mars 'McMurdo' panorama, allisonki, 22:47
Mercury Transit & SOHO, kevin_rehberg, 22:41
Re: Spirit on Mars 'McMurdo' panorama, lal_truckee, 22:16
Re: Spirit on Mars 'McMurdo' panorama, minoxidil, 22:02
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, Davoud, 21:43
Re: photographic tripod for binoculars, John Banister, 21:43
SMART-1 capture *UPDATE*, pslipscomb, 21:42
Re: how often planets Line Up? 500 years//one zodiac sign?, RMOLLISE, 21:41
Re: Spirit on Mars 'McMurdo' panorama, David G. Nagel, 21:11
Re: photographic tripod for binoculars, Howard Lester, 21:07
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, Shawn, 21:01
Re: Spirit on Mars 'McMurdo' panorama, Moe M. Down, 20:49
Re: Griffith Observatory, Jim Klein, 20:45
Re: Griffith Observatory, Jim Klein, 20:18
Re: Spirit on Mars 'McMurdo' panorama, AustinMN, 20:16
Re: Griffith Observatory, Jim Klein, 20:16
Re: Spirit on Mars 'McMurdo' panorama, Tom Polakis, 20:03
Re: M1 - Crab Nebula in Taurus, Anthony Ayiomamitis, 19:44
Re: Spirit on Mars 'McMurdo' panorama, Greg Crinklaw, 19:36
Re: photographic tripod for binoculars, Dennis Woos, 19:29
Re: M1 - Crab Nebula in Taurus, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx, 19:27
Spirit on Mars 'McMurdo' panorama, nawt2smart, 19:24
M1 - Crab Nebula in Taurus, Anthony Ayiomamitis, 18:16
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, Rick Evans, 18:13
Re: Cable channels with the least number of political commercials?, *K*appa, 17:13
Re: NASA Approves Mission and Names Crew for Return to Hubble, Greg Crinklaw, 16:49
International Company Now Hiring-7429, 99kennel, 16:13
Re: how often planets Line Up? 500 years//one zodiac sign?, Joe S., 15:56
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, AustinMN, 14:48
Re: Current Magnitude, RMOLLISE, 14:24
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, Chris.B, 13:39
Re: how often planets Line Up? 500 years//one zodiac sign?, RMOLLISE, 13:34
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, wsnell01, 11:25
Re: Good of NASA to spare one flight for the Hubble!, Matthew Ota, 11:17
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, Matthew Ota, 10:44
Re: Griffith Observatory, Matthew Ota, 10:39
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, Chris.B, 10:39
Re: Griffith Observatory, Matthew Ota, 10:37
Re: Griffith Observatory, Matthew Ota, 10:35
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, JpRw, 08:53
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, JpRw, 08:50
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, JpRw, 08:47
Re: Locating secondary mirror on Newtonian, wsnell01, 08:28
Re: NASA Approves Mission and Names Crew for Return to Hubble, Pat O'Connell, 07:21
Re: how often planets Line Up? 500 years//one zodiac sign?, Starlord, 07:11
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, Davoud, 07:11
Re: Is Jupiter obese?, George, 06:34
Supercomputer Simulates Stellar Evolution, Sam Wormley, 05:20
how often planets Line Up? 500 years//one zodiac sign?, don . lotto, 03:52
Re: how often does the planets Line Up? 500 years//, Nig, 03:40
Re: Is Jupiter obese?, lal_truckee, 03:19
Re: photographic tripod for binoculars, John Nichols, 03:17
Re: Power Source for Thousand Oaks Telrad Heater?, John Nichols, 03:15
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, Moe M. Down, 02:46
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, Alan French, 02:23
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, Brian Tung, 02:16
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, Iordani, 02:04
Re: There is a God!, Tom, 01:52
Re: There is a God!, Eric Greene, 01:26
Re: Forget SETI look for time travellers?, Sam Wormley, 01:22
Re: Hubble repair mission, Rich, 01:12
Re: Astrophotography, wsnell01, 01:06
Forget SETI look for time travellers?, Chris.B, 00:49
Re: Griffith Observatory, Jim Klein, 00:14
Re: Astrophotography, MitchAlsup, 00:06
Re: Linux Astronomy Program ?, Llanzlan Klazmon the 15th, 00:02

November 01, 2006

Re: Good of NASA to spare one flight for the Hubble!, Moe M. Down, 23:59
Re: how often does the planets Line Up? 500 years//, Starlord, 23:57
Re: Linux Astronomy Program ?, Terry A Haimann, 23:27
Re: Astrophotography, Iordani, 23:09
Re: Linux Astronomy Program ?, Llanzlan Klazmon the 15th, 23:01
Re: Astrophotography, RMOLLISE, 22:57
Re: Hubble repair mission, Greg Crinklaw, 22:48
Astrophotography, boanerges35, 22:12
Re: how often does the planets Line Up? 500 years//, IRO, 21:46
Re: Griffith Observatory, Pierre Vandevennne, 20:25
Re: Linux Astronomy Program ?, Klaatu, 19:24
Re: Power Source for Thousand Oaks Telrad Heater?, Mij Adyaw, 19:14
Re: Is Jupiter obese?, Mij Adyaw, 19:12
Linux Astronomy Program ?, Terry A Haimann, 18:09
Sci, questions, and, answer's, esmartguy, 17:05
Re: There is a God!, MitchAlsup, 16:44
Re: Ed Krupp, Jim Klein, 16:36
Re: There is a God!, Tom, 16:20
Re: Ed Krupp, Richard F.L.R.Snashall, 16:13
Re: Hubble repair mission, Don't Be Evil, 15:45
Re: Current Magnitude, Martin Brown, 15:38
Re: Griffith Observatory, Jim Klein, 15:06
Re: Ed Krupp, Jim Klein, 15:05
Nameless critics on the Internet and critical analysis of Einsteinâs E=mc2, AJAY SHARMA, 13:39
Re: Power Source for Thousand Oaks Telrad Heater?, RMOLLISE, 13:38
Re: Current Magnitude, RMOLLISE, 13:36
Re: how often does the planets Line Up? 500 years//, RMOLLISE, 13:32
Re: Full Moon and Quarter Moon, Chris L Peterson, 13:18
Re: Ed Krupp, Bicker, 09:04
Re: Griffith Observatory, Bicker, 09:02
Re: Good of NASA to spare one flight for the Hubble!, Starlord, 07:24
Re: how often does the planets Line Up? 500 years//, Starlord, 07:20
Re: There is a God!, Wynand, 06:52
Re: There is a God!, Wynand, 06:52
Re: Good of NASA to spare one flight for the Hubble!, David G. Nagel, 06:42
Re: Good of NASA to spare one flight for the Hubble!, Sam Wormley, 06:39
Re: Good of NASA to spare one flight for the Hubble!, Moe M. Down, 06:28
Re: Good of NASA to spare one flight for the Hubble!, Mark F., 05:30
Good of NASA to spare one flight for the Hubble!, Rich, 05:23
TRANSIT OF MERCURY, visible NZ 9 oCTOB 2006.- I won't be looking//, don . lotto, 04:26
Re: photographic tripod for binoculars, Richard Amirault, 04:25
how often does the planets Line Up? 500 years//, don . lotto, 04:11
Re: Griffith Observatory, Jim Klein, 03:12
Is Jupiter obese?, Ed Zagmoon, 03:00
Re: Griffith Observatory, Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names, 02:44
Hubble repair mission, Mark F., 02:27
Re: Griffith Observatory, Jim Klein, 02:03
Re: star navigator, thad, 02:00
Re: Griffith Observatory, William R. Mattil, 01:51
Re: Locating secondary mirror on Newtonian, William R. Mattil, 01:47
Re: telrad and smaller scope, Florian, 01:13

October 31, 2006

Re: Griffith Observatory, Mij Adyaw, 23:32