| Subject: | Re: Pluto kooks make the ultimate appeal |
|---|---|
| From: | Chris L Peterson |
| Date: | Sat, 02 Sep 2006 19:38:54 GMT |
| Newsgroups: | sci.astro.amateur |
On Sat, 2 Sep 2006 12:13:31 -0600, "canopus56" <canopus56@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >If anyone knows where there is an online copy, I'd like to read it to see >what the science is behind their proposal. Maybe there is no science behind it- the whole decision really has nothing to do with science, after all. Maybe he's just taking the reasonable position that the IAU shouldn't create a definition for "planet" at all. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Canon Rebel XT, Nikon D50 or Pentax K100 best?, Chris L Peterson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Help me understand Foucault's pendulum?, Alan French |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Pluto kooks make the ultimate appeal, canopus56 |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Pluto kooks make the ultimate appeal, canopus56 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |