|
|
>When did you plan to show that "logical methodology of thinking."?
I displayed it for myself when I scrutinized all the evidence and drew
my own logical conclusions and the post was to challenge others to do
the same. My results parallel the same results of many competent
individuals across America currently, including MANY lawyers, physics
and math professors, economic and political experts, retired and active
military and politicians. The biggest holdup is the fear of
repercussions because of narrow uninformed retalitory attacks. If you
do not understand that, then you have not reviewed the evidence
yourself and are content with biased, uninformed opinions that quote
the contrary with no valid evidence to support it other than what the
government is telling you. My goal was to put the evidence out there
for anyone concerned to read (links at the bottom of the original
post), but I also conceded that more complacent, blind government faith
supporters would bash the post without even offering an ounce of
evidence to support the governments story or review and successfully
refute the evidence that is available for personal scrutiny. Are you
one of these people? If you are, then you're no different the niave
German people who followed Hitler into war, you are no different than
the average American who thought we went to Vietnam for a good reason,
and you are no different than the many Americans today who would label
me a "terrorist or Muslim sympathizer" just because I would dare to
question what really happened on 9/11. I, like all Americans, want
justice for the thousand Americans who died on that day and in the wars
that have ensued since. But statements like "you're either with us, or
against us" smells of Salem Witch trials and the Spanish Inquisition.
If I'm wrong and you're right, then what are you afraid of? You have
nothing to lose and in fact should be able to easily prove the evidence
wrong. But you can't, so what if I'm right? We all have everything to
lose, except for those who are grossly profiting from the current
situation. And my name is signed to the post, you only need pay
attention to what is written. Anyone who has not sifted thru all the
evidence, will only post an opinion that is uniformed, uneducated,
biased, and arrogant which is the way the rest of the world sees all us
Americans currently. Is that the legacy we want to leave our children?
Would a judge in any court case only accept the prosecutions
testimony? There would be far more innocent people in jail if so.
Those currently in the know are simply asking for Due Process as
written in the constitution and Bill of Rights, with a full independent
investigation which the government has refused to cooperate and instead
labels anyone who dares to make such a request unamerican and a
supporter of terrorism. These rights are currently being trampled
everywhere in the US, ignorence in evaluating all the evidence yourself
is no different.
Respectfully,
Larry Patriarca
whowell wrote:
> astronut wrote:
> > Read for yourself, the American Way of Life may depend on it.
> >
> > My apologies for the off-topic, I have actually not posted here for a
> > while but I'm compelled to take the word to the proverbial streets.
> >
> > Many astronomers know me and know my logical methodology of thinking.
>
>
|
|