> Greg Crinklaw wrote:
> Sorry Ed, but your response seems a bit of a non sequitor to me. I was
> explaining the purpose of the CometObs group, not trying to denigrate
> people for not being interested in comets.
Hum - Just what did I write that led you to think I thought you were
denigrating any thing/one?
>The OP (and I though perhaps you) seem to have a misunderstanding about the
>purpose of CometObs.
I thought it as a wonderful source of information I felt worthy of
sharing, no more no less.
> The fact is, I think more people would be interested in observing
> comets--and I'm not talking about discovering them--if they were easier
> to find, and that's what I'm trying to help with.
And I feel you've done much to encourage the viewing of Comets with your
Heck who knows, via serendipity you might have encouraged someone to
become another discoverer of Comets!