| Subject: | Re: leveling a tripod |
|---|---|
| From: | Chris L Peterson |
| Date: | Sun, 30 Apr 2006 16:43:03 GMT |
| Newsgroups: | sci.astro.amateur |
On 30 Apr 2006 09:33:53 -0700, "atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx" <atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Chris L Peterson wrote: >> Your own comment is at least as ambiguous <g>. > >There are only two points (virtual, that is) on earth where my >statement isn't accurate. As I read it, what you said was the RA axis does not need to be aligned to the celestial pole axis. That is false everywhere. Your statement could also be interpreted in a different (and correct way). That's what ambiguous means. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: leveling a tripod, Brian Tung |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: leveling a tripod, Brian Tung |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: leveling a tripod, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Next by Thread: | Re: leveling a tripod, Brian Tung |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |