sci.astro.amateur
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Apply shuttle ET foam in a vacuum.

Subject: Re: Apply shuttle ET foam in a vacuum.
From: "Dr. P. Quackenbush"
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 01:36:26 GMT
Newsgroups: sci.astro.amateur, sci.space.policy, sci.space.shuttle
"John Steinberg" <seesig@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:010820051245353237%seesig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Dr. P. Quackenbush wrote:
>
> > Um, your idea, YOUR homework.  My job is not to prove your ideas will
work
> > or not.  You bring it to the table, you prove it can work.  Those are
the
> > rules of life.
>
> No, it wasn't my idea at all.  I'm not the OP, Quack.
>
> Frankly, I see no advantage to applying foam in a vacuum when the
> launch site is so pregnant with problematic humidity and the foam
> and/or application thereof is not a suitable material or process and/or
> the existing shuttle design is just too flawed to fix.
>
> You opined that there was a "probable need for increased pumping
> capacity," which indicates you don't know if there is an actual need,
> which finally suggests you were passing the burden of proof forward.
>
> Is there a need?  Huh?


I checked with the nice folks at Ames.  Yes, there's a need.  Thanks for
asking.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>