sci.astro.amateur (date)
July 30, 2005
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, Anthony Ayiomamitis, 23:50
- Re: Planet X????, Marty, 23:34
- Re: The pending expansion of Daylight Savings Time, Marty, 23:30
- Ebay, Starlord, 23:18
- Re: Added new Lunar & Planetary images, md, 23:17
- Re: Cherokee #1: Should I buy this used telescope?, Stephen Paul, 23:14
- Re: Added new Lunar & Planetary images, md, 23:14
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, Greg Crinklaw, 22:58
- Re: Added new Lunar & Planetary images, Wes Higgins, 22:57
- Re: Added new Lunar & Planetary images, Wes Higgins, 22:54
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, Chris L Peterson, 22:45
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, Anthony Ayiomamitis, 22:27
- Re: Added new Lunar & Planetary images, md, 22:14
- Re: Added new Lunar & Planetary images, John Nichols, 22:11
- Re: The pending expansion of Daylight Savings Time, NoHope, 21:33
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, William C. Keel, 21:17
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, md, 21:01
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, Jan Owen, 20:58
- Re: Apply shuttle ET foam in a vacuum., Greg D. Moore \(Strider\), 20:43
- Re: Planet X????, U840@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 20:40
- Re: Apply shuttle ET foam in a vacuum., Dr. P. Quackenbush, 20:36
- Re: WARNING! Telescopes.com, G.T., 20:24
- Re: Planet X????, Chris L Peterson, 20:12
- Re: Added new Lunar & Planetary images, Chuck Olson, 20:11
- Re: Apply shuttle ET foam in a vacuum., Gil, 20:08
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, tedkord, 20:01
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, Greg Crinklaw, 19:58
- Re: WARNING! Telescopes.com, Hilton Evans, 19:54
- Added new Lunar & Planetary images, Wes Higgins, 19:52
- Re: WARNING! Telescopes.com, tedkord, 19:22
- Re: Astro equipment pricing?, tedkord, 19:13
- Re: Planet X????, Nick Theodorakis, 19:00
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, Jan Owen, 18:58
- Re: UFO Above Rosamond, Nick Theodorakis, 18:52
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, Greg Crinklaw, 18:38
- Re: WARNING! Telescopes.com, Mark S. Holden, 18:28
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, Doink, 18:20
- Re: Planet X????, edward12@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:17
- Re: WARNING! Telescopes.com, Doink, 18:08
- Re: Planet X????, Stan Jensen, 18:05
- Re: Planet X????, Davoud, 18:05
- Re: The pending expansion of Daylight Savings Time, lal_truckee, 17:34
- Re: Planet X????, PaulCsouls, 17:24
- Re: WARNING! Telescopes.com, Doink, 17:24
- Re: Cherokee #1: Should I buy this used telescope?, Cherokee, 17:23
- Re: Humongus Ice Water Lake on Mars, szaki, 17:21
- Re: The pending expansion of Daylight Savings Time, Dave Jessie, 16:54
- Re: Apply shuttle ET foam in a vacuum., Roy Smith, 16:38
- Re: Apply shuttle ET foam in a vacuum., Chris L Peterson, 16:35
- Re: WARNING! Telescopes.com, Philippe HAAKE, 16:02
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, Joe Bergeron, 16:01
- Re: Planet X????, John Savard, 15:51
- Re: WARNING! Telescopes.com, Joe Bergeron, 15:46
- Re: The pending expansion of Daylight Savings Time, William Hamblen, 15:46
- giant solar prom evolves, nytecam, 14:36
- Re: Apply shuttle ET foam in a vacuum., Roy Smith, 14:31
- Re: Eye relief of Parks Gold 3.8mm EP?, John Carruthers, 13:17
- Planet X????, Joe S., 11:22
- noctilucent cloud this morning [Sat July 30], nytecam, 11:17
- Re: Anthony Ayiomamitis & APOD, Ioannis, 11:04
- Re: Anthony Ayiomamitis & APOD, Anthony Ayiomamitis, 10:59
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 29 Jul 05 Washington,DC, Horse Feathers, 10:57
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, Huh?, 10:51
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, Huh?, 10:48
- Discuss Astrology to Divination, Numerology, Palmistry and everything, astrozzzzzzzzzzzzz, 10:47
- Re: UFO Above Rosamond, Huh?, 10:45
- Discuss Astrology to Divination, Numerology, Palmistry and everything, astrozzzzzzzzzzzzz, 10:44
- Re: Apply shuttle ET foam in a vacuum., Carsten A. Arnholm, 10:32
- Re: The pending expansion of Daylight Savings Time, G.T., 08:07
- Re: The pending expansion of Daylight Savings Time, William Hamblen, 07:46
- Re: UFO Above Rosamond, edward12@xxxxxxxxxxx, 07:21
- Re: WARNING! Telescopes.com, Hilton Evans, 07:21
- Re: UFO Above Rosamond, edward12@xxxxxxxxxxx, 07:18
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 29 Jul 05 Washington, DC, Jan Owen, 07:03
- Re: Astronomy Picture of the Day, Carl D . Smith, 06:56
- Re: UFO Above Rosamond, Carl D . Smith, 06:52
- Re: Cherokee #1: Should I buy this used telescope?, Sean Golden, 05:58
- Humongus Ice Water Lake on Mars, Coppy Littlehouse, 05:26
- Re: Astro equipment pricing?, Mark D, 05:21
- Re: WARNING! Telescopes.com, Mark D, 05:03
- Apply shuttle ET foam in a vacuum., Mr Scott, 04:41
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 29 Jul 05 Washington, DC, Jan Owen, 04:35
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 29 Jul 05 Washington, DC, G.T., 04:15
- Cassini Finds an Active, Watery World at Saturn's Enceladus, Sam Wormley, 04:05
- Cassini Finds an Active, Watery World at Saturn's Enceladus, Sam Wormley, 04:01
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 29 Jul 05 Washington, DC, Jan Owen, 03:55
- Re: Something wrong with my telrad?, Starlord, 03:47
- Re: shuttle woes, thad, 03:33
- Re: Shuttle fleet grounded, Chris L Peterson, 03:23
- Anthony Ayiomamitis & APOD, Ed T, 03:17
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 29 Jul 05 Washington, DC, Chris L Peterson, 03:16
- Re: Shuttle fleet grounded, Ernie Wright, 03:13
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 29 Jul 05 Washington, DC, Jan Owen, 03:06
- Re: The pending expansion of Daylight Savings Time, Alson Wong, 03:04
- Re: Something wrong with my telrad?, Florian, 02:28
- Re: Photos of Del Cep Wanted, canopus56, 02:15
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 29 Jul 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 02:01
- Re: Astro Imager's filter wheel question, canopus56, 02:00
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, G.T., 02:00
- Re: WARNING! Telescopes.com, William Hamblen, 01:56
- Re: WARNING! Telescopes.com, Doink, 01:53
- Re: Astro equipment pricing?, Doink, 01:52
- Re: Astro equipment pricing?, szaki, 01:52
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, Brian Tung, 01:50
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 29 Jul 05 Washington, DC, Virtigo, 01:50
- Re: Something wrong with my telrad?, Chris L Peterson, 01:46
- Re: UFO Above Rosamond, William Hamblen, 01:45
- Re: Something wrong with my telrad?, William Hamblen, 01:45
- Re: Something wrong with my telrad?, Brian Tung, 01:40
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, eawckyegcy, 01:37
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, allisonki, 01:32
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 29 Jul 05 Washington, DC, Howard Lester, 01:14
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, Greg Crinklaw, 01:14
- Re: Something wrong with my telrad?, Chris L Peterson, 01:11
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, Jan Owen, 00:57
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 29 Jul 05 Washington, DC, Jan Owen, 00:50
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, eawckyegcy, 00:38
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 29 Jul 05 Washington, DC, Chris L Peterson, 00:36
- Space Weather News for July 29, 2005, Sam Wormley, 00:34
- Virtigo, Starlord, 00:34
- Re: Something wrong with my telrad?, Chris L Peterson, 00:30
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, Brian Tung, 00:25
- Re: Something wrong with my telrad?, Brian Tung, 00:15
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, Jan Owen, 00:10
- Re: Astronomy Picture of the Day, Robin Leadbeater, 00:09
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, Brian Tung, 00:02
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 29 Jul 05 Washington, DC, Virtigo, 00:02
- Re: WARNING! Telescopes.com, Al Battlestown, 00:02
July 29, 2005
- Re: Astro equipment pricing?, Al Battlestown, 23:58
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 29 Jul 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 23:56
- Re: Astro equipment pricing?, CLT, 23:50
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 29 Jul 05 Washington, DC, David Knisely, 23:44
- Re: UFO Above Rosamond, David Knisely, 23:37
- WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 29 Jul 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley, 23:18
- Re: WARNING! Telescopes.com, David G. Nagel, 23:14
- Re: Cherokee #1: Should I buy this used telescope?, Cherokee, 23:12
- Astro equipment pricing?, Keith Winter, 22:55
- Re: UFO Above Rosamond, Virtigo, 22:40
- Re: Astronomy Picture of the Day, Dennis Allen, 22:40
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, Doink, 22:35
- Re: Something wrong with my telrad?, Florian, 22:33
- Using DSLR camera with FastStar OTA, szaki, 22:29
- Re: 4x5 astrophotography (was Re: Canon Rebel widefield images [Lyra]), Brian Reynolds, 22:24
- Re: Astronomy Picture of the Day, Anthony Ayiomamitis, 22:14
- Re: Astronomy Picture of the Day, Anthony Ayiomamitis, 22:13
- Re: Something wrong with my telrad?, Doink, 22:08
- Re: WARNING! Telescopes.com, Doink, 22:05
- Re: Cherokee #1: Should I buy this used telescope?, Stephen Paul, 21:56
- Re: The pending expansion of Daylight Savings Time, Hilton Evans, 21:54
- Re: WARNING! Telescopes.com, Cherokee, 21:19
- Re: Something wrong with my telrad?, Chris L Peterson, 21:15
- Re: WARNING! Telescopes.com, Hilton Evans, 21:05
- Astronomy Picture of the Day, Dennis Allen, 21:05
- Re: WARNING! Telescopes.com, Doink, 20:47
- Re: WARNING! Telescopes.com, Bert Hyman, 20:38
- Eye relief of Parks Gold 3.8mm EP?, auriga_m38, 20:37
- Re: WARNING! Telescopes.com, Tom Polakis, 20:35
- Re: Something wrong with my telrad?, Florian, 20:29
- Re: UFO Above Rosamond, Starlord, 20:29
- Re: share astro-pics via Yahoo Groups-Photos?, Starlord, 20:27
- Re: WARNING! Telescopes.com, G.T., 20:13
- Re: New large TNO, and surface water on Mars, Bert Hyman, 19:56
- The Milky Way in the Aquila, Danilo Pivato, 19:53
- Re: Cherokee #1: Should I buy this used telescope?, Cherokee, 19:50
- Re: New large TNO, and surface water on Mars, Ed T, 19:49
- Re: UFO Above Rosamond, Chris McMahan, 19:39
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, David Nakamoto, 19:36
- WARNING! Telescopes.com, Doink, 19:33
- Re: Sky Observer take note -- Optical Illusions, CLT, 19:27
- Re: The pending expansion of Daylight Savings Time, Jan Owen, 19:25
- Re: The pending expansion of Daylight Savings Time, Tim Auton, 19:18
- Re: Something wrong with my telrad?, Doink, 19:11
- Re: Confused about a mount for a Stellarvue Nighthawk, Stephen Paul, 19:05
- Re: The pending expansion of Daylight Savings Time, Virtigo, 18:45
- shuttle woes, Virtigo, 18:41
- Re: UFO Above Rosamond, Virtigo, 18:27
- Re: Photos of Del Cep Wanted, tony_flanders, 17:59
- Re: S & T uses low end paper, Milton Aupperle, 17:54
- Re: The pending expansion of Daylight Savings Time, William Foley, 17:52
- S & T uses low end paper, astrojoe, 17:40
- Re: UFO Above Rosamond, Starlord, 17:23
- Sky Observer take note -- Optical Illusions, Sam Wormley, 16:59
- Re: New large TNO, and surface water on Mars, JXStern, 16:50
- Re: Confused about a mount for a Stellarvue Nighthawk, khatcat, 16:31
- Re: UFO Above Rosamond, Marty, 15:27
- New large TNO, and surface water on Mars, Robert Leigh, 14:54
- Re: Hi-Res lunar images: updates, Giorgio Mengoli, 14:11
- Re: LX200 Adapter Plate, thad, 13:36
- Re: Astro Photo tutorial for Digital SLR?, Rob Johnson, 13:27
- Re: UFO Above Rosamond, AD Orion Šakovo, 12:55
- share astro-pics via Yahoo Groups-Photos?, nytecam, 12:46
- H-alpha images coronado PST/Coolpix 4500, orion94nl, 11:26
- Re: Mt Wilson Record, Mike Simmons, 10:33
- Re: Solar Transit by ISS+STS-114 finally imaged, Anthony Ayiomamitis, 09:42
- Re: The pending expansion of Daylight Savings Time, Mij Adyaw, 08:08
- UFO Above Rosamond, Starlord, 08:03
- Re: Astro Photo tutorial for Digital SLR?, Jim w, 07:17
- The pending expansion of Daylight Savings Time, Martin R. Howell, 06:38
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, John Savard, 06:26
- Astro Photo tutorial for Digital SLR?, Mike W., 04:14
- Re: ATM Schmidt Camera Question!, Ed Majden, 02:55
- Re: ATM Schmidt Camera Question!, Chris L Peterson, 02:39
- Re: Solar Transit by ISS+STS-114 finally imaged, Mark Gingrich, 02:22
- Re: ATM Schmidt Camera Question!, Ed Majden, 02:15
- Re: Mars Type B vs #21 filter, Ed T, 02:07
- Re: Mars Type B vs #21 filter, Stephen Paul, 01:33
- Re: The 2005 SCT User Imaging Competition is History!, Ed T, 01:22
- Re: image magnification problems with Toucam, Robin Leadbeater, 01:10
- Re: image magnification problems with Toucam, Chris L Peterson, 00:48
- Re: image magnification problems with Toucam, Camp Abernathy, 00:38
- Re: ATM Schmidt Camera Question!, Chris L Peterson, 00:24
- Re: image magnification problems with Toucam, Robin Leadbeater, 00:19
- ATM Schmidt Camera Question!, Ed Majden, 00:17
- Re: Solar Transit by ISS+STS-114 finally imaged, Bill Dean, 00:10
- Re: Cherokee #1: Should I buy this used telescope?, Stephen Paul, 00:02
July 28, 2005
- Re: Telrad's Here!, Zarkovic, 23:38
- Re: image magnification problems with Toucam, Camp Abernathy, 23:28
- Re: Solar Transit by ISS+STS-114 finally imaged, Tom Randy, 23:02
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, geraldkelleher, 22:43
- Telrad's Here!, John Nichols, 22:25
- Re: Something wrong with my telrad?, Mark D, 22:24
- Re: Confused about a mount for a Stellarvue Nighthawk, Stephen Paul, 22:06
- Re: image magnification problems with Toucam, Bob May, 21:55
- Re: Solar Transit by ISS+STS-114 finally imaged, Jan Owen, 21:39
- Re: Hi-Res lunar images: updates, RS, 21:33
- Re: Something wrong with my telrad?, Zarkovic, 21:20
- Confused about a mount for a Stellarvue Nighthawk, khatcat, 20:55
- Re: Solar Transit by ISS+STS-114 finally imaged, Chris L Peterson, 20:39
- Re: Solar Transit by ISS+STS-114 finally imaged, Brian Tung, 20:37
- Re: Solar Transit by ISS+STS-114 finally imaged, md, 20:33
- HUBBLE PINPOINTS DOOMED STAR THAT EXPLODES AS SUPERNOVA (STScI-PRC05-21), INBOX ASTRONOMY : NEWS ALERT, 20:28
- Re: Solar Transit by ISS+STS-114 finally imaged, Chris L Peterson, 20:21
- Re: Solar Transit by ISS+STS-114 finally imaged, szaki, 20:12
- Re: Solar Transit by ISS+STS-114 finally imaged, Some guy in Arizona, 20:06
- image magnification problems with Toucam, Camp Abernathy, 20:01
- Photos of Del Cep Wanted, tony_flanders, 20:01
- Re: Solar Transit by ISS+STS-114 finally imaged, Davoud, 19:57
- Re: Something wrong with my telrad?, Florian, 19:30
- Re: First Light 150mm Orion Maksutov, Jan Owen, 19:15
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Alexander Avtanski, 18:59
- Re: Something wrong with my telrad?, Zarkovic, 18:44
- Solar Transit by ISS+STS-114 finally imaged, Anthony Ayiomamitis, 18:42
- Re: Hi-Res lunar images: updates, CLT, 18:34
- Re: Something wrong with my telrad?, CLT, 18:30
- Re: Something wrong with my telrad?, CLT, 18:27
- Re: Cherokee #1: Should I buy this used telescope?, CLT, 18:22
- Re: Cherokee #1: Should I buy this used telescope?, starburst, 18:22
- Re: Shuttle fleet grounded, Chris L Peterson, 18:20
- Re: Shuttle fleet grounded, Ernie Wright, 18:08
- Re: Something wrong with my telrad?, Starlord, 18:08
- Re: Something wrong with my telrad?, Shawn, 17:57
- Re: Something wrong with my telrad?, Zarkovic, 17:50
- Re: Shuttle fleet grounded, ROC, 17:37
- Re: Cherokee #1: Should I buy this used telescope?, Tim Auton, 17:20
- Re: Something wrong with my telrad?, Zarkovic, 17:13
- Re: Cherokee #1: Should I buy this used telescope?, Ed T, 17:04
- Re: Something wrong with my telrad?, Morris Jones, 16:54
- Cherokee #1: Should I buy this used telescope?, Cherokee, 16:39
- pic of big solar prom + earth to scale, nytecam, 16:32
- Re: Shuttle fleet grounded, Joe Bergeron, 15:31
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, Sam Wormley, 15:25
- Re: Something wrong with my telrad?, Mark D, 15:23
- Re: Shuttle fleet grounded, Davoud, 15:06
- Re: Shuttle fleet grounded, Martin Brown, 15:04
- Re: Shuttle fleet grounded, Mark S. Holden, 14:07
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, Paul Schlyter, 13:43
- Re: Questions Meade 102ED & LX650, Hilton Evans, 12:26
- Re: First Light 150mm Orion Maksutov, goma, 11:35
- Hi-Res lunar images: updates, Giorgio Mengoli, 11:35
- S&T report - night vision, nytecam, 10:42
- Something wrong with my telrad?, Zarkovic, 09:14
- Re: First Light 150mm Orion Maksutov, szaki, 08:51
- Re: Shuttle fleet grounded, CLT, 07:49
- Re: BREAKING NEWS: Life and Times of Sirius B, CLT, 07:26
- Re: Grand Teton Fireball of 1972... looking for video, Scott Lowther, 06:24
- First Light 150mm Orion Maksutov, Richard Carlson, 06:21
- LX200 Adapter Plate, Paul Del Priore, 06:20
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, William Hamblen, 06:06
- Re: Mt Wilson Record, Matthew Ota, 05:26
- Mars Type B vs #21 filter, Ron B[ee], 03:40
- The 2005 SCT User Imaging Competition is History!, RMOLLISE, 03:20
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Havriliak, 02:32
- [gse-aa] Auroral Alert, Sam Wormley, 02:23
- Re: Questions Meade 102ED & LX650, reconair, 01:17
July 27, 2005
- Re: Grand Teton Fireball of 1972... looking for video, Iceman-Jamie, 22:36
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Havriliak, 21:56
- Re: Unfolding Space Telescope., Bob May, 21:24
- Re: Unfolding Space Telescope., MitchAlsup, 21:14
- Re: Rosamond Report = Good Night, Starlord, 20:43
- Re: Questions Meade 102ED & LX650, Hilton Evans, 20:40
- Re: Unfolding Space Telescope., lal_truckee, 20:29
- Re: Unfolding Space Telescope., Chris L Peterson, 18:28
- Unfolding Space Telescope., DaveMan, 17:54
- Re: 1.25" TV plossl vs other 2", Zarkovic, 17:30
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Brian Tung, 17:17
- Re: 4x5 astrophotography (was Re: Canon Rebel widefield images [Lyra]), laura halliday, 17:15
- Re: Rosamond Report = Good Night, jameswilliamjohnson, 17:01
- Re: Mars tonight, C-8 vs. APO!, Mij Adyaw, 16:41
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Dave Mitsky, 15:42
- 4x5 astrophotography (was Re: Canon Rebel widefield images [Lyra]), Brian Reynolds, 14:44
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, tony_flanders, 14:32
- Re: Celestron fork mount not tracking, RMOLLISE, 14:15
- Re: Big boys' toys, AA Institute, 13:16
- Re: Mars tonight, C-8 vs. APO!, szaki, 10:16
- Re: Mt Wilson Record, Mike Simmons, 08:58
- Re: Mars tonight, C-8 vs. APO!, Horse Feathers, 08:57
- Re: Questions Meade 102ED & LX650, William Hamblen, 08:51
- Re: Rosamond Report = Good Night, T.T., 08:50
- Rosamond Report = Good Night, Starlord, 08:16
- Re: Questions Meade 102ED & LX650, Llanzlan Klazmon, 07:55
- Re: Questions Meade 102ED & LX650, Llanzlan Klazmon, 07:46
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Mij Adyaw, 06:38
- Re: Mars tonight, C-8 vs. APO!, Mij Adyaw, 06:36
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Brian Tung, 05:14
- Grand Teton Fireball of 1972... looking for video, Scott Lowther, 05:04
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Mark S. Holden, 04:33
- Questions Meade 102ED & LX650, reconair, 04:03
- Re: Celestron 8 inch Schmidt Camera, George Normandin, 03:49
- Re: I got it, Starlord, 03:35
- Re: Star Party ( kind of ), Starlord, 03:32
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, canopus56, 03:23
- Re: Star Party ( kind of ), Llanzlan Klazmon, 02:37
- Nova in Scorpius, allisonki, 02:37
- Re: Mars tonight, C-8 vs. APO!, Cherokee, 02:08
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Larry Stedman, 02:05
- Oregon Star Party-Pre-Registration Deadline approaching, bill, 01:48
- Oregon Star Party-Pre-Registration Deadline approaching, bill, 01:47
- Re: Star Party ( kind of ), Mij Adyaw, 01:15
- Astro Imager's filter wheel question, Jon Hightower, 01:03
- Star Party ( kind of ), Starlord, 00:51
- Re: 5-inch refractor group, PJ, 00:45
- Re: Bring Back Your Memories..., Starlord, 00:43
- Re: 5-inch refractor group, PJ, 00:42
- Re: 5-inch refractor group, PJ, 00:41
- Re: Rosamond Report, Starlord, 00:38
- Re: July's Full Moon, Starlord, 00:35
- Re: July's Full Moon, G.T., 00:31
- Re: 1.25" TV plossl vs other 2", Larry Stedman, 00:24
- Re: The Krell are from Saturn originally, Dark Lord of Sith, 00:15
- Re: Twenty-day old moon, CLT, 00:12
July 26, 2005
- Re: Space Weather News for July 26, 2005, ROC, 23:42
- Bring Back Your Memories..., Larry Stedman, 23:36
- Re: Celestron fork mount not tracking, szaki, 23:31
- Re: Celestron fork mount not tracking, MitchAlsup, 23:25
- Re: July's Full Moon, Norbert, 22:42
- Re: Rosamond Report, jameswilliamjohnson, 22:27
- Re: July's Full Moon, Starlord, 22:18
- Re: July's Full Moon, Starlord, 22:18
- Space Weather News for July 26, 2005, Sam Wormley, 22:04
- Re: 5-inch refractor group, Richard F.L.R.Snashall, 21:53
- Re: Big boys' toys, William C. Keel, 21:49
- Re: 5-inch refractor group, David Nakamoto, 21:37
- Re: Celestron fork mount not tracking, szaki, 21:18
- Re: Celestron fork mount not tracking, szaki, 21:13
- Re: Celestron fork mount not tracking, RMOLLISE, 20:51
- Re: July's Full Moon, Norbert, 20:49
- Re: Mars tonight, C-8 vs. APO!, szaki, 20:44
- Re: Mt Wilson Record, beavith, 20:40
- Re: Mars tonight, C-8 vs. APO!, Mij Adyaw, 20:19
- Re: Mars tonight, C-8 vs. APO!, Mij Adyaw, 20:17
- Re: 5-inch refractor group, Chris.B, 19:37
- Re: Mars tonight, C-8 vs. APO!, Cherokee, 19:34
- Celestron fork mount not tracking, szaki, 18:56
- Re: 5-inch refractor group, Stephen Paul, 18:40
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Stephen Paul, 18:30
- Re: Mars tonight, C-8 vs. APO!, szaki, 17:57
- Re: Mars tonight, C-8 vs. APO!, Cherokee, 16:09
- Re: Twenty-day old moon, Sam Wormley, 15:57
- Twenty-day old moon, Anthony Ayiomamitis, 15:18
- Mars tonight, C-8 vs. APO!, szaki, 11:30
- Re: July's Full Moon, Anthony Ayiomamitis, 11:03
- Re: Canon Rebel widefield images [Lyra], thad, 10:37
- Re: The Krell are from Saturn originally, Shoe! Fly, 09:37
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Chris.B, 09:36
- Re: July's Full Moon, Shoe! Fly, 09:36
- Re: July's Full Moon, Shoe! Fly, 09:35
- Re: Yuk, Shoe! Fly, 09:33
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Shoe! Fly, 09:18
- Re: hello, Shoe! Fly, 09:16
- Re: OT: We're Not Afraid, Shoe! Fly, 09:08
- Re: Astronomy Hacks by Robert Bruce Thompson, Barbara Fritchman Thompson, Shoe! Fly, 09:06
- Re: Development kills off another observatory, Shoe! Fly, 09:03
- Re: moon landings were a hoax, edward12@xxxxxxxxxxx, 07:54
- Re: Big boys' toys, William Hamblen, 05:46
- The Krell are from Saturn originally, lal_truckee, 04:26
- Re: July's Full Moon, JATO, 04:19
- Re: S&T LASIK article, Shawn, 03:17
- Re: Under the summer sky, Cherokee, 00:55
- Re: Planetarium program for old laptop, Tom Rankin, 00:31
- Re: My old astroscan, Tom Rankin, 00:29
- Re: S&T LASIK article, Mij Adyaw, 00:21
- Re: Under the summer sky, CLT, 00:15
- Re: July's Full Moon, CLT, 00:11
July 25, 2005
- Re: July's Full Moon, G.T., 23:45
- Re: SS2K vs. Mead LXD-75 or C-GT, Roger Hamlett, 23:31
- Re: Under the summer sky, G.T., 23:26
- Re: July's Full Moon, Anthony Ayiomamitis, 23:21
- Re: Under the summer sky, Cherokee, 23:20
- Re: July's Full Moon, CLT, 23:18
- Re: Mt Wilson Record, tony_flanders, 22:00
- Rosamond Report, Starlord, 21:59
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Cherokee, 21:49
- Canon Rebel widefield images [Lyra], nytecam, 21:48
- Re: moon landings were a hoax, tony_flanders, 21:36
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, tony_flanders, 21:03
- Re: Which one-power finder?, John Nichols, 20:54
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, tony_flanders, 20:46
- Re: Big boys' toys, Howard Lester, 19:46
- Re: July's Full Moon, Anthony Ayiomamitis, 19:20
- Re: July's Full Moon, Norbert, 19:05
- Re: SS2K vs. Mead LXD-75 or C-GT, szaki, 18:20
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, tony_flanders, 18:12
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Starlord, 17:55
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Starlord, 17:49
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Curtis Croulet, 17:29
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, geraldkelleher, 17:22
- Apogee EQ5 mount, Curtis Croulet, 17:21
- Re: Celestron 8 inch Schmidt Camera, laura halliday, 17:17
- Under the summer sky, laura halliday, 17:12
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Herb York, 16:33
- Re: S&T LASIK article, Shawn, 16:24
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Mark S. Holden, 15:35
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Mark S. Holden, 15:34
- July's Full Moon, Anthony Ayiomamitis, 15:13
- Re: 5-inch refractor group, fstops, 15:09
- Re: SS2K vs. Mead LXD-75 or C-GT, Roger Hamlett, 15:05
- Re: 5-inch refractor group, RMOLLISE, 14:18
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Bill, 14:02
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Chris.B, 13:57
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, reconair, 12:33
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Dave Mitsky, 10:45
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Dave Mitsky, 10:41
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Martin Brown, 10:27
- Re: 5-inch refractor group, Chris.B, 09:53
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, G.T., 08:44
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, jsavard, 06:43
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, CLT, 05:49
- Re: S&T LASIK article, Mark, 05:26
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Stephen Paul, 05:15
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Mark S. Holden, 04:10
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Florian, 03:20
- Re: hello, CLT, 03:12
- Re: 5-inch refractor group, Llanzlan Klazmon, 03:09
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Cherokee, 02:53
- Yuk, Starlord, 02:37
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Starlord, 02:30
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Marty, 02:12
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Zarkovic, 01:53
- Re: Big boys' toys, Ed, 01:52
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Bill, 01:52
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Zarkovic, 01:48
- Re: OPTISAN-150mm reflector?, Jan Owen, 01:45
- Re: OPTISAN-150mm reflector?, Zarkovic, 01:37
- Re: Mt Wilson Record, Howard Lester, 01:26
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Cherokee, 00:51
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, G.T., 00:38
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Mark S. Holden, 00:06
July 24, 2005
- Re: latest huygens data?, Eric, 23:17
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Jan Owen, 23:04
- Re: New Club Forming in Wisconsin, Jeff Setzer, 22:56
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Cherokee, 22:51
- Re: S&T LASIK article, Shawn, 22:39
- Re: hello, Skylook123, 22:32
- Re: 5-inch refractor group, PJ, 22:14
- Re: moon landings were a hoax, Shawn, 22:13
- Url error, Ed Majden, 22:12
- Re: Celestron 8 inch Schmidt Camera, Ed Majden, 22:06
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Florian, 21:53
- Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Gregory, 21:47
- Re: S&T LASIK article, Mark, 21:32
- What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?, Cherokee, 21:19
- Re: 5-inch refractor group, Cherokee, 21:05
- Re: OPTISAN-150mm reflector?, brightstardown, 20:57
- OPTISAN-150mm reflector?, brightstardown, 20:52
- Re: Mt Wilson Record, Jan Owen, 20:34
- Re: Celestron 8 inch Schmidt Camera, David Nakamoto, 20:16
- Re: 5-inch refractor group, David Nakamoto, 20:14
- Re: hello, David Nakamoto, 20:12
- Re: S&T LASIK article, Don Bruns, 20:09
- Re: 5-inch refractor group, PJ, 19:43
- Re: Zarkovic's new scope! Woo Hoo! :-), Starlord, 19:37
- Re: hello, Starlord, 19:26
- Re: moon landings were a hoax, Jan Owen, 19:22
- Re: Zarkovic's new scope! Woo Hoo! :-), Zarkovic, 19:07
- Re: Just waiting to observe, Zarkovic, 19:00
- hello, Bubs, 18:56
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, Marty, 18:51
- Re: Mt Wilson Record, Marty, 18:42
- Re: moon landings were a hoax, Mij Adyaw, 18:40
- Re: DSLR's non- Canon for Astro, nytecam, 18:37
- sun spotty again - some prom pics, nytecam, 18:33
- Re: Mt Wilson Record, Howard Lester, 18:10
- Re: 5-inch refractor group, Cherokee, 18:00
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, alkoenig, 17:59
- Celestron 8 inch Schmidt Camera, Ed Majden, 17:46
- Re: moon landings were a hoax, Tom Randy, 17:30
- Re: Big boys' toys, abdul . ahad, 16:30
- Big boys' toys, Tim Auton, 15:08
- Re: DSLR's non- Canon for Astro, djhanson100, 11:38
- Re: Mt Wilson Record, Terry B, 09:00
- Re: moon landings were a hoax, Paul Schlyter, 08:45
- Re: Zarkovic's new scope! Woo Hoo! :-), Starlord, 08:25
- 5-inch refractor group, PJ, 08:22
- Re: moon landings were a hoax, T.T., 07:36
- Re: DSLR's non- Canon for Astro, Stephen Paul, 06:35
- Re: moon landings were a hoax, Bob May, 06:33
- Re: Kendrik kwik focus, Bob May, 06:31
- Re: Just waiting to observe, Bob May, 06:24
- Re: DSLR's non- Canon for Astro, szaki, 05:52
- Re: moon landings were a hoax, jameswilliamjohnson, 05:46
- Re: DSLR's non- Canon for Astro, szaki, 05:44
- Re: Kendrik kwik focus, Mark D, 05:10
- Re: Zarkovic's new scope! Woo Hoo! :-), Zarkovic, 04:15
- P.S. Re: moon landings were a hoax., Daniel Joseph Min, 03:59
- P.S. Re: moon landings were a hoax, Daniel Joseph Min, 03:58
- Kendrik kwik focus, Mark C, 03:30
- New Solar Imaging Yahoo! Group, PJ, 03:29
- Re: S&T LASIK article, William Hamblen, 03:21
- Re: DSLR's non- Canon for Astro, djhanson100, 03:19
- Re: moon landings were a hoax (minor correction)., Daniel Joseph Min, 03:13
- Re: moon landings were a hoax (minor correction), Daniel Joseph Min, 03:10
- Re: Exotic observing locations, Martin R. Howell, 02:19
- Re: S&T LASIK article, Chris L Peterson, 02:00
- Re: S&T LASIK article, Mark, 01:54
- Re: Just waiting to observe, CLT, 01:51
- Re: Mt Wilson Record, techman, 01:47
- Re: moon landings were a hoax, CLT, 01:47
- Re: S&T LASIK article, andrewpreece, 01:42
- S&T LASIK article, Mark, 01:22
- Re: moon landings were a hoax, dsmalln, 00:19
July 23, 2005
- Re: latest huygens data?, Tim Auton, 23:22
- Re: DSLR's non- Canon for Astro, Mark S. Holden, 23:02
- Re: latest huygens data?, Eric, 22:53
- Re: moon landings were a hoax, Wally Anglesea, 22:39
- Re: Just waiting to observe, Jan Owen, 22:35
- Re: DSLR's non- Canon for Astro, G.T., 22:35
- Re: DSLR's non- Canon for Astro, Robin Leadbeater, 22:30
- Re: moon landings were a hoax, Richard F.L.R.Snashall, 22:18
- Re: DSLR's non- Canon for Astro, szaki, 22:15
- Re: DSLR's non- Canon for Astro, G.T., 22:14
- Re: moon landings were a hoax, SPAMtrap, 22:13
- Re: Just waiting to observe, CLT, 22:05
- DSLR's non- Canon for Astro, szaki, 22:03
- Re: latest huygens data?, Sam Wormley, 21:41
- Re: Canon Rebel widefield images [Lyra], laura halliday, 20:18
- Re: Exotic observing locations, Glenn Holliday, 20:03
- Re: moon landings were a hoax, Daniel Joseph Min, 19:55
- Re: moon landings were a hoax, Daniel Joseph Min, 19:48
- Re: Canon Rebel widefield images [Lyra], RMOLLISE, 17:16
- Re: Mt Wilson Record, Starlord, 17:07
- Re: moon landings were a hoax, Hilton Evans, 17:02
- Re: moon landings were a hoax, Chris L Peterson, 16:20
- Re: moon landings were a hoax, Joe S., 15:59
- Re: moon landings were a hoax, Sam Wormley, 15:38
- Re: Canon Rebel widefield images [Lyra], orly . andico, 14:37
- Re: moon landings were a hoax, Eddie Trimarchi, 14:29
- moon landings were a hoax, moonlandinghoaxreligious@xxxxxxxxx, 10:09
- Re: Mt Wilson Record, G.T., 09:15
- Re: The 2005 Perseid Meteor Shower & Mars, canopus56, 07:47
- Re: Mt Wilson Record, Hilton Evans, 03:42
- Re: My old astroscan, Ol' Duffer, 03:30
- Re: orion 80mm shorttube as guidescope, Chris L Peterson, 01:35
- Re: Mt Wilson Record, Jan Owen, 01:03
- Just waiting to observe, Zarkovic, 00:37
- Re: orion 80mm shorttube as guidescope, md, 00:30
- Re: Mt Wilson Record, Tom Polakis, 00:27
- Re: orion 80mm shorttube as guidescope, RMOLLISE, 00:26
- Re: My old astroscan, Adam Norton, 00:24
- Re: Mt Wilson Record, RMOLLISE, 00:22
- Re: OT: We're Not Afraid, RMOLLISE, 00:17
- Re: Mt Wilson Record, Stephen Paul, 00:14
- Re: Mt Wilson Record, Starlord, 00:13
July 22, 2005
- Re: Planetarium program for old laptop, George Hein, 23:39
- Re: Looking for advice on finderscopes., Brian Tung, 23:21
- Re: Looking for advice on finderscopes., Brian Tung, 22:38
- Re: Looking for advice on finderscopes., tony_flanders, 22:37
- Re: Astronomy Hacks by Robert Bruce Thompson, Barbara Fritchman Thompson, Brian Tung, 22:36
- Re: Mt Wilson Record, Marty, 22:33
- Re: Mt Wilson Record, decaf, 22:18
- Re: Planetarium program for old laptop, Glenn Becker, 22:09
- Re: Looking for advice on finderscopes., William Hamblen, 21:46
- Re: orion 80mm shorttube as guidescope, Chris L Peterson, 21:44
- Re: Mt Wilson Record, Marty, 21:42
- Re: orion 80mm shorttube as guidescope, RMOLLISE, 21:16
- Re: My old astroscan, RMOLLISE, 21:13
- Re: Mt Wilson Record, RMOLLISE, 21:10
- Re: Astronomy Hacks by Robert Bruce Thompson, Barbara Fritchman Thompson, eawckyegcy, 20:40
- OT: We're Not Afraid, Gareth Slee, 20:03
- Re: sharpest lunar images request, canopus56, 20:00
- Re: sharpest lunar images request, canopus56, 19:32
- Re: Looking for advice on finderscopes., Brian Tung, 19:09
- Re: Looking for advice on finderscopes., tony_flanders, 18:14
- Re: Bill Vorce:, Herb York, 18:05
- Re: Big Bang or Big Splat?, William C. Keel, 18:01
- Re: Bill Vorce:, Howard Lester, 17:47
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, William Foley, 17:33
- Re: My old astroscan, Mean Mr Mustard, 17:28
- Re: Looking for advice on finderscopes., William C. Keel, 17:14
- Mt Wilson Record, Starlord, 16:53
- Re: Pics from 8" APO v. lowly SCTs, William C. Keel, 16:28
- Re: My old astroscan, nytecam, 15:06
- Re: Development kills off another observatory, Hilton Evans, 14:45
- Re: Astronomy Hacks by Robert Bruce Thompson, Barbara Fritchman Thompson, Hilton Evans, 14:39
- Re: Moon and Stars, Tom Randy, 12:31
- Re: sharpest lunar images request, C H Yeung, 10:59
- Re: Development kills off another observatory, Peter Bealo, 10:52
- Re: orion 80mm shorttube as guidescope, justbeats, 10:07
- Re: Astronomy Hacks by Robert Bruce Thompson, Barbara Fritchman Thompson, Brian Tung, 08:56
- Re: sharpest lunar images request, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx, 08:55
- Re: Astronomy Hacks by Robert Bruce Thompson, Barbara Fritchman Thompson, G.T., 07:59
- Re: Astronomy Hacks by Robert Bruce Thompson, Barbara Fritchman Thompson, G.T., 07:57
- Re: Astronomy Hacks by Robert Bruce Thompson, Barbara Fritchman Thompson, Zarkovic, 07:51
- Re: Astronomy Hacks by Robert Bruce Thompson, Barbara Fritchman Thompson, Brian Tung, 06:20
- Tripod for N8 and N5, Gene, 05:29
- Astronomy Hacks by Robert Bruce Thompson, Barbara Fritchman Thompson, G.T., 04:32
- Re: orion 80mm shorttube as guidescope, Chris L Peterson, 02:33
- Re: Bill Vorce:, Bill Meyers, 02:29
- Re: orion 80mm shorttube as guidescope, Duke, 02:16
- Development kills off another observatory, Hilton Evans, 01:52
- My old astroscan, rmorea, 01:30
- Re: orion 80mm shorttube as guidescope, Gaz, 01:27
- orion 80mm shorttube as guidescope, md, 01:07
- Re: sharpest lunar images request, JATO, 00:48
July 21, 2005
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, Bert Hyman, 22:02
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, Paul Winalski, 21:56
- Re: sharpest lunar images request, nytecam, 19:58
- Re: sharpest lunar images request, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:59
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, Hilton Evans, 13:16
- Re: Moon and Stars, Oh Yea?, 09:51
- Re: sharpest lunar images request, nytecam, 09:50
- Re: sharpest lunar images request, Oh Yea?, 09:37
- Re: Google Moon, Oh Yea?, 09:32
- Re: Google Moon, Oh Yea?, 09:31
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, Oh Yea?, 09:28
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, Oh Yea?, 09:24
- Losmandy GM-8, Some guy in Arizona, 05:15
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, Pat O'Connell, 05:12
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, Tom Rankin, 03:03
July 20, 2005
- Re: Google Moon, ROC, 23:15
- Re: sharpest lunar images request, RMOLLISE, 22:01
- Re: sharpest lunar images request, Mark S. Holden, 21:50
- Re: sharpest lunar images request, Bob May, 20:53
- Re: Moon and Stars - It's worse than that, he's dead Jim! (James Doohan, RIP), Mark S. Holden, 20:15
- Moon and Stars, Starlord, 20:04
- Re: Google Moon, Mij Adyaw, 20:02
- Re: Google Moon, G.T., 19:40
- Re: Google Moon, Mij Adyaw, 19:29
- Re: Google Moon, G.T., 19:25
- Re: sharpest lunar images request, Anthony Ayiomamitis, 19:11
- Re: Google Moon, Mij Adyaw, 18:57
- sharpest lunar images request, Bill Peterson, 18:53
- Re: Google Moon, CLT, 18:38
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, Tim Killian, 18:13
- Re: Petzval Design?, Tim Killian, 18:05
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, Hilton Evans, 15:38
- Re: Google Moon, Davoud, 14:55
- Re: Petzval Design?, jsavard, 14:45
- Re: Makes Sense, will.caver, 14:28
- Re: Google Moon, Philippe HAAKE, 13:54
- Re: Google Moon, Thomas Swanson, 13:36
- Google Moon, Linus Das, 11:40
- Re: I got it, Joe S., 09:17
- Re: Atlas advice, Brian Tung, 09:13
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, Starlord, 09:05
- Re: I got it, Starlord, 09:03
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, Pat O'Connell, 07:06
- Re: I got it, Mij Adyaw, 05:43
- Re: I got it, Mark D, 05:22
- Re: I got it, Joe S., 04:12
- Re: Atlas advice, Stephen Paul, 02:43
- Re: I got it, Jan Owen, 01:30
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, Llanzlan Klazmon, 01:14
- Re: I got it, Starlord, 01:05
July 19, 2005
- Re: I got it, Mark D, 22:14
- Re: Exotic observing locations, tony_flanders, 22:08
- Re: Big Bang or Big Splat?, Martin Brown, 21:33
- Exotic observing locations, Martin R. Howell, 21:08
- Re: Big Bang or Big Splat?, Chris L Peterson, 21:04
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, tony_flanders, 20:49
- Re: Which one-power finder?, MitchAlsup, 20:49
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, Greg Crinklaw, 20:21
- Re: Big Bang or Big Splat?, Tim Killian, 19:45
- Re: Paranormal website, Shawn, 19:18
- Paranormal website, artbellfan, 19:11
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, Martin Brown, 18:41
- Re: I got it, Paul Winalski, 16:56
- Re: Atlas advice, tony_flanders, 15:59
- Re: New Club Forming in Wisconsin, Bob Schmall, 15:08
- Re: Which one-power finder?, Florian, 08:23
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, Wayne Howell, 07:49
- Re: Which one-power finder?, David Knisely, 07:28
- Re: Which one-power finder?, David Knisely, 07:25
- Re: Which one-power finder?, David Knisely, 07:23
- I got it, Zarkovic, 06:35
- Re: What kinds of aliens could the Oort cloud harbor?, William Hamblen, 05:46
- Re: Bill Vorce:, phil, 04:50
- Re: New Club Forming in Wisconsin, Kelly Beatty, 04:32
- Re: New Club Forming in Wisconsin, Kelly Beatty, 04:28
- Re: New Club Forming in Wisconsin, Kelly Beatty, 04:28
- Re: What kinds of aliens could the Oort cloud harbor?, Jan Owen, 04:13
- Looking for Excel spreadsheet for calibrating CCD images, canopus56, 04:11
- Re: Which one-power finder?, John Nichols, 02:42
- Re: Which one-power finder?, John Nichols, 02:36
- Re: How to remove DOS-programs from desktop, Llanzlan Klazmon, 02:27
- Re: How to remove DOS-programs from desktop, Llanzlan Klazmon, 02:19
- Re: Follow my logic here.., andrewpreece, 01:03
- Re: Not Von Daniken again I hope..., Gold_Star, 00:38
- Re: AURORA ALERT: People in Canada and northern US states should bealert for auroras tonight, nytecam, 00:22
- Re: Which one-power finder?, Starlord, 00:13
July 18, 2005
- Re: Atlas advice, Stephen Paul, 23:29
- Re: Celestron C65 Mini Mak, Brian Tung, 23:05
- Celestron C65 Mini Mak, Robert Sheaffer, 23:00
- Re: Why Longer Focal Length for Planetary?, Brian Tung, 22:52
- Re: Why Longer Focal Length for Planetary?, Brian Tung, 22:49
- Taz on Mars, Mike, 22:27
- Re: Which one-power finder?, Michael McCulloch, 22:21
- Re: Which one-power finder?, Big Al, 22:12
- Re: Not Von Daniken again I hope. - OT, Kim Bowers, 22:12
- Re: Which one-power finder?, Michael McCulloch, 22:06
- Re: Which one-power finder?, Mij Adyaw, 22:01
- Re: Which one-power finder?, Mark S. Holden, 22:00
- Re: Which one-power finder?, John Nichols, 21:56
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, Hilton Evans, 21:10
- Re: Makes Sense, Mark S. Holden, 21:01
- Re: Which one-power finder?, Michael McCulloch, 20:54
- Re: Which one-power finder?, David Knisely, 20:48
- Re: Makes Sense, Mike, 20:46
- Re: Not Von Daniken again I hope..., Jan Owen, 20:42
- Re: Howard "James and Bobby Purify" Lester ???????, CLT, 20:29
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, CLT, 20:29
- Which one-power finder?, John Nichols, 20:24
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, Tim Auton, 20:03
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, Wayne Howell, 20:01
- Re: Howard "James and Bobby Purify" Lester ???????, Howard Lester, 19:58
- New Club Forming in Wisconsin, Bob Schmall, 19:15
- Re: Makes Sense, Michael McCulloch, 18:58
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, MitchAlsup, 18:42
- Re: Makes Sense, Ed T, 18:41
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, David G. Nagel, 18:37
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, Hilton Evans, 18:00
- Re: Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, William C. Keel, 17:57
- Re: How to remove DOS-programs from desktop, Shawn, 17:55
- Re: How to remove DOS-programs from desktop, Hilton Evans, 17:52
- Re: How to remove DOS-programs from desktop, Paul Schlyter, 17:43
- Earthly Benefits of the Space Program?, RS, 17:12
- Re: Makes Sense, Mike, 17:09
- Re: How to remove DOS-programs from desktop, Bill Johnson, 17:08
- Re: Makes Sense, Mike, 17:07
- Re: How to remove DOS-programs from desktop, Ed T, 17:05
- Re: How to remove DOS-programs from desktop, Ed T, 17:03
- Re: How to remove DOS-programs from desktop, rich brenz, 16:51
- Re: How to remove DOS-programs from desktop, rich brenz, 16:49
- Re: 24-Hour Star Trails In One Exposure?, Tom Polakis, 16:49
- Re: How to remove DOS-programs from desktop, Ed T, 15:42
- Re: Hand held illuminator, thad, 15:30
- Re: Makes Sense, Michael McCulloch, 15:26
- Re: How to remove DOS-programs from desktop, Chris L Peterson, 15:22
- How to remove DOS-programs from desktop, rich brenz, 15:16
- quiet sun [Mon July 18], nytecam, 15:15
- Re: Makes Sense, Mark S. Holden, 15:06
- Re: Bill Vorce:, John Steinberg, 14:32
- Re: Bill Vorce:, John Steinberg, 14:13
- Re: Hand held illuminator, Paul Buglass, 14:05
- Re: Makes Sense, Chris.B, 12:02
- latest huygens data?, Eric, 10:26
- Re: Makes Sense, Zarkovic, 10:03
- Re: Bill Vorce:, jerry warner, 09:09
- Re: Makes Sense, Starlord, 08:30
- Re: Bill Vorce:, Starlord, 08:21
- Re: Bill Vorce:, data . plumber, 08:18
- Re: Star Analyser announced:, jerry warner, 08:14
- Re: Star Analyser announced:, jerry warner, 08:02
- Re: Bill Vorce:, jerry warner, 07:52
- Re: Bill Vorce:, jerry warner, 07:12
- Makes Sense, Mike, 06:32
- RegiStaq ?, Terry A Haimann, 05:38
- Re: Bill Vorce: Jerry, Mark S. Holden, 04:51
- Re: Bill Vorce: Jerry, Bill Peterson, 04:05
- Re: monochromatic refractor, boofreak, 04:02
- Re: Yosemite Glacier Point star party, Mark F., 03:13
- Re: doublet question, Mike, 03:10
- Re: Question about astronomical images, desertrat7374, 03:06
- Re: Kids in Space, JATO, 02:53
- Re: doublet question, William Hamblen, 02:46
- Re: AURORA ALERT: People in Canada and northern US states should be alert for auroras tonight, njrusty, 01:50
- Re: Atlas advice, Marty, 01:42
- Re: Question about astronomical images, Bill Griffiths, 01:36
- Re: 24-Hour Star Trails In One Exposure?, Ron Lee, 01:27
- Re: Question about astronomical images, will.caver, 01:16
- Re: Kids in Space, Wally Anglesea, 01:06
- Re: Question about astronomical images, Tim Auton, 00:45
- Re: Kids in Space, Hilton Evans, 00:38
- Re: Question about astronomical images, Chris L Peterson, 00:22
- Re: Question about astronomical images, Chris L Peterson, 00:17
July 17, 2005
- Re: Question about astronomical images, desertrat7374, 23:59
- Re: Question about astronomical images, desertrat7374, 23:49
- Re: 1.25" TV plossl vs other 2", Stephen Paul, 23:31
- two current novae revisited, nytecam, 23:28
- Re: Bill Vorce:, data . plumber, 23:25
- Re: Atlas advice, Florian, 23:23
- Re: doublet question, CLT, 23:00
- Re: Deep impact brightness, Scott Smith, 22:49
- Re: doublet question, Mike, 22:20
- Re: Atlas advice, Doink, 22:05
- Re: Atlas advice, Doink, 21:58
- Re: doublet question, Bob May, 21:57
- Re: Atlas advice, Doink, 21:57
- Re: Atlas advice, Bob May, 21:55
- Re: doublet question, William Hamblen, 21:46
- Re: doublet question, Richard F.L.R.Snashall, 20:28
- Re: Star Analyser announced:, Robin Leadbeater, 20:25
- Re: televue eyepieces, William Hamblen, 20:23
- Re: Atlas advice, David Knisely, 20:19
- Re: Question about astronomical images, Chris L Peterson, 20:13
- Question about astronomical images, desertrat7374, 20:00
- Re: Filters, Paul Winalski, 20:00
- doublet question, Mike, 19:55
- Re: televue eyepieces, Paul Winalski, 19:42
- Re: Atlas advice, Brian Tung, 19:41
- Re: 1.25" TV plossl vs other 2", Paul Winalski, 19:35
- Re: Orion posts 150mm Mak, 80 mm F/6, Frank Hofmann, 19:29
- Re: Star Analyser announced:, Chris L Peterson, 19:13
- Re: Bill Vorce:, Phil C, 19:10
- Re: monochromatic refractor, Peoples People, 18:59
- Re: Star Analyser announced:, Havriliak, 18:54
- Re: Star Analyser announced:, Havriliak, 18:54
- Re: Star Analyser announced:, Havriliak, 18:54
- Re: Star Analyser announced:, Havriliak, 18:54
- Re: Atlas advice, Peoples People, 18:51
- Re: Star Analyser announced:, Pierre Vandevennne, 16:41
- Re: Atlas advice, Florian, 16:39
- Re: Unbelievable, AstroHoney, 16:31
- Moon occults bright star Anteres tonight., szaki, 16:23
- Re: 1.25" TV plossl vs other 2", Mark D, 15:31
- Re: Bill Vorce:, rfsinc, 15:07
- Re: planet killed! saga of an atm'r (long), Scott Smith, 13:49
- Re: Calibrating tracking during the day...., Odysseus, 12:49
- Re: Star Analyser announced:, Robin Leadbeater, 12:07
- Re: Sky & Telescope's News Bulletin - Jul 15, Jonathan Silverlight, 11:35
- 1.25" TV plossl vs other 2", Zarkovic, 10:06
- Re: Kids in Space, geraldkelleher, 09:52
- Rosamond Report, Starlord, 09:51
- Re: AURORA ALERT: People in Canada and northern US states should bealert for auroras tonight, David Knisely, 09:45
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, geraldkelleher, 09:35
- Re: Atlas advice, Philippe HAAKE, 09:11
- Re: Bill Vorce:, G.T., 07:14
- Atlas advice, Doink, 06:48
- Re: Bill Vorce: Jerry, Doink, 06:43
- Re: wide field EP...which one?, Mark S. Holden, 06:04
- Re: Filters, Mark S. Holden, 05:45
- Re: Filters, Mark D, 05:43
- Re: Get Me Started (again...), Lee Bouknight, 05:07
- Re: Looking for advice on finderscopes., Axel, 04:55
- Re: Howard "James and Bobby Purify" Lester ???????, Jan Owen, 04:38
- Re: Howard "James and Bobby Purify" Lester ???????, Jan Owen, 04:36
- Re: Solar activity has suddenly increased with a series of strong..., ROC, 04:26
- Re: help in evaluating an informal ed website, ROC, 04:21
- Re: wide field EP...which one?, Zarkovic, 04:10
- wide field EP...which one?, Zarkovic, 03:58
- Re: Star Analyser announced:, CLT, 03:48
- Re: Bill Vorce:, CLT, 03:43
- Re: Unbelievable, RMOLLISE, 03:37
- Re: 1.25" or 2", Zarkovic, 03:02
- Re: Filters, Zarkovic, 03:00
- Filters, Zarkovic, 02:56
- Re: monochromatic refractor, Peoples People, 02:55
- Howard "James and Bobby Purify" Lester ???????, Mike, 02:13
- Re: 24-Hour Star Trails In One Exposure?, Coppy Littlehouse, 02:10
- Re: Sky & Telescope's News Bulletin - Jul 15, CLT, 02:10
- Star Analyser announced:, jerry warner, 01:57
- Re: Calibrating tracking during the day...., Tim Auton, 01:56
- Re: AURORA ALERT: People in Canada and northern US states should bealert for auroras tonight, Jan Owen, 01:48
- Re: Calibrating tracking during the day...., CLT, 01:42
- Re: Calibrating tracking during the day...., CLT, 01:41
- Re: Sky & Telescope's News Bulletin - Jul 15, Tom, 01:39
- Re: Bill Vorce:, jerry warner, 01:31
- Re: Kids in Space, Wally Anglesea, 01:26
- Re: Bill Vorce:, jerry warner, 01:24
- Re: Bill Vorce:, jerry warner, 01:23
- Re: monochromatic refractor, jerry warner, 01:18
- Re: televue eyepieces, Stephen Paul, 01:16
- Re: Kids in Space, tasty, 00:58
July 16, 2005
- Re: AURORA ALERT: People in Canada and northern US states should bealert for auroras tonight, pay1439, 23:23
- Re: televue eyepieces, Zarkovic, 23:05
- Re: Calibrating tracking during the day...., Wayne Howell, 23:04
- Re: Hand held illuminator, William Hamblen, 22:27
- Re: Calibrating tracking during the day...., Doink, 22:23
- Re: Looking for advice on finderscopes., William Hamblen, 22:15
- Re: Kids in Space, geraldkelleher, 22:00
- Re: Calibrating tracking during the day...., matt, 21:52
- Re: Why so much fus?, Thomas Swanson, 21:13
- Re: Calibrating tracking during the day...., Dan Mckenna, 21:12
- Re: 24-Hour Star Trails In One Exposure?, geraldkelleher, 20:44
- Re: Sky & Telescope's News Bulletin - Jul 15, David Knisely, 20:25
- Hand held illuminator, Doink, 19:59
- Re: Calibrating tracking during the day...., Doink, 19:22
- Re: Calibrating tracking during the day...., Wayne Howell, 19:10
- Calibrating tracking during the day...., Doink, 18:53
- Re: help in evaluating an informal ed website, Doink, 18:40
- Re: Looking for advice on finderscopes., Bill Cotten, 18:39
- Re: Looking for advice on finderscopes., Chris L Peterson, 18:32
- Re: televue eyepieces, Paul Winalski, 18:21
- Re: Planetarium program for old laptop, Robert Sheaffer, 18:14
- help in evaluating an informal ed website, Sam Wormley, 18:05
- Re: Looking for advice on finderscopes., Mark S. Holden, 18:03
- Re: 1.25" or 2", Larry Stedman, 17:56
- Re: Buying a new telescope...LONG, Larry Stedman, 17:41
- Re: Sky & Telescope's News Bulletin - Jul 15, Sam Wormley, 17:27
- Re: Sky & Telescope's News Bulletin - Jul 15, Larry G, 17:25
- Re: 1.25" or 2", Mark D, 17:15
- Re: Sky & Telescope's News Bulletin - Jul 15, ACE, 17:15
- Re: Why Longer Focal Length for Planetary?, jsavard, 15:52
- Re: Looking for advice on finderscopes., Michael McCulloch, 15:49
- Re: 24-Hour Star Trails In One Exposure?, Havriliak, 15:36
- Re: 24-Hour Star Trails In One Exposure?, geraldkelleher, 12:52
- Re: Pics from 8" APO v. lowly SCTs, Brian Tung, 09:47
- Re: Solar activity has suddenly increased with a series of strong..., Brian Tung, 09:26
- Re: AURORA ALERT: People in Canada and northern US states should be alert for auroras tonight, David Knisely, 07:27
- Re: Unbelievable, Tom, 07:15
- Re: AURORA ALERT: People in Canada and northern US states should be alert for auroras tonight, Tom, 07:12
- Re: Why Longer Focal Length for Planetary?, CLT, 06:42
- Re: Pics from 8" APO v. lowly SCTs, CLT, 06:35
- Re: Pics from 8" APO v. lowly SCTs, CLT, 06:29
- Re: monochromatic refractor, CLT, 06:28
- Re: 24-Hour Star Trails In One Exposure?, William Hamblen, 06:26
- Re: Looking for advice on finderscopes., William Hamblen, 06:26
- Re: monochromatic refractor, William Hamblen, 06:26
- Re: 1.25" or 2", William Hamblen, 06:26
- Re: Solar activity has suddenly increased with a series of strong..., CLT, 06:26
- Re: Bill Vorce:, CLT, 06:24
- Re: Deep impact brightness, Greg Crinklaw, 06:07
- Re: Why so much fus?, Starlord, 06:06
- Re: AURORA ALERT: People in Canada and northern US states should be alert for auroras tonight, ROC, 05:03
- Sky & Telescope's News Bulletin - Jul 15, SJG, 04:45
- Re: Why Longer Focal Length for Planetary?, William Foley, 04:37
- Re: Why so much fus?, Greg Crinklaw, 01:36
- AURORA ALERT: People in Canada and northern US states should be alert for auroras tonight, Sam Wormley, 01:32
- Re: Why so much fus?, Greg Crinklaw, 01:26
- Re: Fantastic Spot Shot with 3D, Wally Anglesea, 01:19
- Re: Why so much fus?, Greg Crinklaw, 01:02
- Re: Planetarium program for old laptop, tasty, 00:59
- Re: Deep Silence?, Greg Crinklaw, 00:07
July 15, 2005
- Re: Unbelievable, RMOLLISE, 23:54
- Re: Unbelievable, RMOLLISE, 23:50
- Re: Pics from 8" APO v. lowly SCTs, RMOLLISE, 23:43
- Fantastic Spot Shot with 3D, ROC, 23:41
- Re: Looking for advice on finderscopes., Mark S. Holden, 23:36
- Re: Fixing a Cemented Doublet, ROC, 23:31
- Re: Solar activity has suddenly increased with a series of strong..., Tom, 23:22
- Re: eye relief, Bill Davis Jr, 23:21
- AL: 2005 Council Meeting Agenda (First Draft), eflaspo, 22:28
- Re: Why Longer Focal Length for Planetary?, Mark S. Holden, 21:59
- Re: Solar activity has suddenly increased with a series of strong..., jon, 21:57
- Re: Why Longer Focal Length for Planetary?, Bob May, 21:30
- Re: Fixing a Cemented Doublet, Bob May, 21:25
- Re: Bill Vorce:, Howard Lester, 21:18
- Re: 1.25" or 2", Howard Lester, 21:15
- Re: Solar activity has suddenly increased with a series of strong..., jon, 21:10
- Re: eye relief, Mark D, 20:59
- Re: monochromatic refractor, boofreak, 20:50
- Re: 1.25" or 2", Mark D, 20:48
- Re: Why Longer Focal Length for Planetary?, Mark S. Holden, 20:43
- Re: Why so much fus?, Wayne Howell, 20:21
- Re: Bill Vorce:, Tim Auton, 20:02
- Re: televue eyepieces, Zarkovic, 19:47
- Re: Bill Vorce:, John Steinberg, 19:42
- Re: Why Longer Focal Length for Planetary?, Mij Adyaw, 19:41
- Re: eye relief, Mark S. Holden, 19:18
- Re: Why so much fus?, Hilton Evans, 19:02
- eye relief, Zarkovic, 19:00
- Re: Fixing a Cemented Doublet, Chris.B, 19:00
- Re: 1.25" or 2", Zarkovic, 18:52
- Re: 1.25" or 2", Zarkovic, 18:49
- Re: Bill Vorce:, Howard Lester, 18:39
- Re: Looking for advice on finderscopes., Doink, 18:39
- Re: Bill Vorce:, G.T., 18:32
- Re: Buying a new telescope...LONG, Zarkovic, 18:28
- Re: Increasing height of a rocker box - advice needed, Stephen Paul, 18:24
- Re: 2" star diagonal question, Stephen Paul, 18:18
- Re: 1.25" or 2", Larry Stedman, 18:16
- Re: 1.25" or 2", Mark D, 18:11
- Re: televue eyepieces, Paul Winalski, 18:06
- Re: planet killed! saga of an atm'r (long), Larry Stedman, 18:05
- Re: Big Eyepieces, Ed T, 18:01
- Re: Buying a new telescope...LONG, Larry Stedman, 18:00
- Re: Solar activity has suddenly increased with a series of strong..., Mike, 17:50
- Re: 1.25" or 2", Stephen Paul, 17:48
- Re: Pics from 8" APO v. lowly SCTs, Chris L Peterson, 17:47
- Re: Big Eyepieces, MitchAlsup, 17:36
- Re: Why Longer Focal Length for Planetary?, Stuart Levy, 17:34
- Re: Why so much fus?, Shawn, 17:30
- Re: Looking for advice on finderscopes., MitchAlsup, 17:28
- Re: Pics from 8" APO v. lowly SCTs, matt, 17:26
- Re: Looking for advice on finderscopes., Ed T, 17:23
- Re: 2" star diagonal question, Howard Lester, 17:16
- Re: televue eyepieces, George Hein, 17:02
- Re: Bill Vorce:, shneor, 16:58
- Re: 24-Hour Star Trails In One Exposure?, Tom Polakis, 16:50
- Re: Why Longer Focal Length for Planetary?, Ed T, 16:44
- Re: Looking for advice on finderscopes., George Hein, 16:39
- Re: Looking for advice on finderscopes., jameswilliamjohnson, 16:39
- Re: Looking for advice on finderscopes., Morris Jones, 16:29
- Re: Why so much fus?, Starlord, 16:24
- Re: Increasing height of a rocker box - advice needed, starburst, 16:16
- Re: Looking for advice on finderscopes., Mark S. Holden, 16:06
- Re: Pics from 8" APO v. lowly SCTs, John Curl, 16:05
- Re: Planetarium program for old laptop, Paul Schlyter, 15:44
- Looking for advice on finderscopes., Bill Cotten, 15:26
- Re: Solar activity has suddenly increased with a series of strong..., Bob Schmall, 15:25
- Re: Deep Silence?, Bob Schmall, 15:22
- Re: First look at the SKY Quality Meter., Les Blalock, 15:18
- Re: Planetarium program for old laptop, Philippe HAAKE, 15:11
- Re: Fixing a Cemented Doublet, Ed T, 15:03
- Re: 1.25" or 2", Stephen G . Giannoni, 14:53
- Re:Planetarium program for old laptop, rich brenz, 14:52
- Re: Why so much fus?, Hilton Evans, 13:40
- Re: Unbelievable, Tom Randy, 13:22
- Re: Deep Silence?, Tom Randy, 13:20
- Re: Why so much fus?, jsavard, 13:00
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, jsavard, 12:51
- First look at the SKY Quality Meter., Dan Mckenna, 11:08
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, Paul Schlyter, 10:42
- Re: monochromatic refractor, Paul Schlyter, 10:14
- Re: 24-Hour Star Trails In One Exposure?, Paul Schlyter, 10:14
- Re: 24-Hour Star Trails In One Exposure?, Paul Schlyter, 10:14
- Re: Bill Vorce:, Jean Dorsey, 10:03
- 1.25" or 2", Zarkovic, 09:49
- Re: Why Longer Focal Length for Planetary?, Marry, 09:15
- Re: monochromatic refractor, Martin Brown, 09:13
- Re: Pics from 8" APO v. lowly SCTs, hooskerdoo, 09:10
- Re: Why Longer Focal Length for Planetary?, Marry, 09:07
- Re: Why so much fus?, Marry, 08:58
- Re: Yosemite Glacier Point star party, Tom, 08:58
- Re: Fixing a Cemented Doublet, jerry warner, 08:56
- Re: Fixing a Cemented Doublet, jerry warner, 08:54
- Kids in Space, Tom, 08:45
- Re: Fixing a Cemented Doublet, jerry warner, 08:45
- Re: monochromatic refractor, jerry warner, 08:41
- Re: Bill Vorce:, jerry warner, 08:35
- Re: Pics from 8" APO v. lowly SCTs, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx, 08:34
- Re: Petzval Design?, matt, 08:24
- Re: Why so much fus?, Starlord, 08:14
- Re: Pics from 8" APO v. lowly SCTs, Chi-hung Yeung, 07:42
- Re: 2" star diagonal question, Tom, 07:37
- Re: Solar activity has suddenly increased with a series of strong..., Tom, 07:26
- Re: Petzval Design?, Richard F.L.R.Snashall, 06:42
- Re: Bill Vorce:, fjo324@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 06:28
- Re: Petzval Design?, jsavard, 06:21
- Increasing height of a rocker box - advice needed, michael_jasper@xxxxxxxxx, 06:17
- Re: Petzval Design?, jsavard, 06:08
- Big Eyepieces, rmorea, 05:59
- Re: Why Longer Focal Length for Planetary?, jsavard, 05:55
- Re: Pics from 8" APO v. lowly SCTs, John Curl, 05:54
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, jsavard, 05:50
- Re: Bill Vorce:, CLT, 05:43
- Re: Get Me Started (again...), Stephen Paul, 05:43
- Re: Why Longer Focal Length for Planetary?, CLT, 05:41
- Re: Why Longer Focal Length for Planetary?, Brian Tung, 05:40
- Re: televue eyepieces, Mark D, 05:38
- Re: Pics from 8" APO v. lowly SCTs, CLT, 05:36
- Re: Why Longer Focal Length for Planetary?, Mark S. Holden, 05:28
- Re: Pics from 8" APO v. lowly SCTs, Ed T, 04:58
- Re: Get Me Started (again...), Lee Bouknight, 04:49
- Re: Why so much fus?, Uncle Bob, 04:45
- Re: Why Longer Focal Length for Planetary?, Uncle Bob, 04:43
- Re: Pics from 8" APO v. lowly SCTs, Mark S. Holden, 04:39
- Re: monochromatic refractor, CLT, 04:26
- Re: Pics from 8" APO v. lowly SCTs, Ed T, 04:24
- Re: Pics from 8" APO v. lowly SCTs, hooskerdoo, 03:42
- Re: monochromatic refractor, boo, 03:25
- Re: Pics from 8" APO v. lowly SCTs, Mark S. Holden, 03:13
- Re: Fixing a Cemented Doublet, Havriliak, 02:56
- Re: Fixing a Cemented Doublet, Mark S. Holden, 02:50
- Re: Fixing a Cemented Doublet, Havriliak, 02:42
- Pics from 8" APO v. lowly SCTs, hooskerdoo, 02:33
- Re: Unbelievable, Doink, 02:28
- Re: monochromatic refractor, Chris L Peterson, 02:19
- Re: Bill Vorce:, fcathell, 02:05
- Re: Fixing a Cemented Doublet, Ed T, 02:01
- Re: Why so much fus?, Jan Owen, 01:59
- Re: rini's website, Mark S. Holden, 01:55
- Re: Why so much fus?, Zarkovic, 01:54
- Why so much fus?, Zarkovic, 01:48
- Re: Deep Silence?, Zarkovic, 01:43
- Re: Fixing a Cemented Doublet, Havriliak, 01:41
- Re: monochromatic refractor, boofreak, 01:29
- Re: 24-Hour Star Trails In One Exposure?, Chris L Peterson, 01:24
- Re: monochromatic refractor, boofreak, 01:22
- Re: monochromatic refractor, Chris L Peterson, 01:18
- Re: monochromatic refractor, Ed T, 00:53
- 24-Hour Star Trails In One Exposure?, Tom Polakis, 00:50
- Fixing a Cemented Doublet, Ed T, 00:45
- monochromatic refractor, boofreak, 00:37
- Re: Some elementary questions, Rishi Sinha, 00:24
- Re: Mirror polishing problem, Chris.B, 00:21
July 14, 2005
- Re: Unbelievable, Starlord, 23:42
- Re: Strange Days in Rosamond, Starlord, 23:38
- runi's website, Zarkovic, 23:32
- Re: Solar activity has suddenly increased with a series of strong..., DaveMan, 23:26
- Re: Mirror polishing problem, Intertracer, 23:23
- Re: 2" star diagonal question, CLT, 23:05
- Re: Solar activity has suddenly increased with a series of strong..., CLT, 23:00
- Re: Yosemite Glacier Point star party, Morris Jones, 22:49
- Re: How to describe location, Dave Jessie, 22:46
- Re: 2" star diagonal question, MitchAlsup, 22:38
- Re: Solar activity has suddenly increased with a series of strong..., Ben Bos, 22:32
- Re: Solar activity has suddenly increased with a series of strong..., Jan Owen, 22:18
- Re: Petzval Design?, Richard F.L.R.Snashall, 22:11
- Re: Yosemite Glacier Point star party, Michael McCulloch, 22:10
- Re: Solar activity has suddenly increased with a series of strong..., Chris L Peterson, 22:03
- Re: Solar activity has suddenly increased with a series of strong..., ROC, 21:46
- Solar activity has suddenly increased with a series of strong..., Sam Wormley, 21:26
- Re: Unbelievable, Tom, 20:30
- Re: Planetarium program for old laptop, Florian, 20:15
- Re: Deep impact brightness, David Nakamoto, 20:09
- Re: televue eyepieces, Mark S. Holden, 20:07
- Re: Unbelievable, Ed T, 19:59
- Re: Unbelievable, Mark S. Holden, 19:49
- Unbelievable, Tom, 19:44
- 2" star diagonal question, Tom, 19:23
- Re: Some elementary questions, Paul Schlyter, 19:17
- Shuttle trouble, Tom, 19:08
- Re: televue eyepieces, Mij Adyaw, 19:08
- Re: Deep Silence?, Tom, 19:03
- televue eyepieces, Zarkovic, 19:01
- Bill Vorce:, jerry warner, 18:54
- Re: Deep Silence?, Bob Schmall, 18:43
- Re: Planetarium program for old laptop, Florian, 18:42
- Re: Strange Days in Rosamond, Tom Hise, 18:19
- Re: trapezium, Jan Owen, 18:18
- Re: Planetarium program for old laptop, Nostromozar, 18:17
- Re: Deep impact brightness, Chris L Peterson, 18:10
- Re: Planetarium program for old laptop, Glenn Becker, 18:08
- Planetarium program for old laptop, Glenn Becker, 18:05
- Re: Strange Days in Rosamond, Starlord, 18:05
- Deep impact brightness, Tom, 17:53
- Re: Strange Days in Rosamond, G.T., 17:51
- Deep Silence?, Tom, 17:49
- Re: trapezium, ROC, 17:37
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, jsavard, 17:27
- Re: Petzval Design?, jsavard, 17:21
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, Tom, 17:18
- Yosemite Glacier Point star party, Morris Jones, 17:08
- Re: How to describe location, Howard Lester, 16:56
- Re: Strange Days in Rosamond, Martin R. Howell, 16:54
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, Howard Lester, 16:53
- Re: Strange Days in Rosamond, Starlord, 16:10
- Re: Some elementary questions, tony_flanders, 16:10
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, tony_flanders, 13:44
- Re: Mirror polishing problem, decaf, 12:46
- Re: Some elementary questions, Paul Schlyter, 12:43
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, decaf, 12:37
- Some elementary questions, Rishi Sinha, 09:51
- Re: Strange Days in Rosamond, Thanks, 09:30
- Re: Petzval Design?, Thanks, 09:28
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, Thanks, 09:17
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, Thanks, 09:15
- Re: Mirror polishing problem, Thanks, 09:11
- Re: Epsilon lyra, Thanks, 09:06
- Re: How to describe location, Martin R. Howell, 09:02
- Re: Petzval Design?, Brian Tung, 08:17
- Re: Petzval Design?, Llanzlan Klazmon, 06:59
- Re: Get Me Started (again...), Stephen Paul, 06:14
- Re: Strange Days in Rosamond, Mark F., 05:08
- trapezium, Tom, 03:54
- Re: Petzval Design?, tjp314, 02:36
- Re: Get Me Started (again...), starburst, 01:37
- Re: Petzval Design?, Llanzlan Klazmon, 01:24
- Re: Petzval Design?, Brian Tung, 01:06
- Re: How to describe location, Beta Persei, 00:47
- Re: How to describe location, Marty, 00:18
- Re: Petzval Design?, Llanzlan Klazmon, 00:17
- Re: planet killed! saga of an atm'r (long), starburst, 00:11
- Re: Petzval Design?, Stephen Paul, 00:04
July 13, 2005
- Re: Get Me Started (again...), Bill Davis Jr, 23:32
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, Tom, 22:59
- Re: How to describe location, Brian Tung, 22:46
- Re: How to describe location, Brian Tung, 22:44
- Re: Supernovae - novae - average duration ?, Brian Tung, 22:43
- Re: Big Bang or Big Splat?, Brian Tung, 22:38
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, decaf, 22:35
- Re: Big Bang or Big Splat?, Chris L Peterson, 22:26
- Re: Get Me Started (again...), Lee Bouknight, 21:51
- Re: Petzval Design?, William Hamblen, 21:46
- Re: How to describe location, Beta Persei, 21:45
- Re: How to describe location, Ed T, 21:31
- Re: Petzval Design?, Richard F.L.R.Snashall, 21:22
- Re: Petzval Design?, Bob May, 21:21
- Re: Supernovae - novae - average duration ?, canopus56, 21:20
- Re: Big Bang or Big Splat?, Jonathan Bartlett, 20:56
- Re: Petzval Design?, Howard Lester, 20:55
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, Howard Lester, 20:49
- Re: How to describe location, Marty, 20:44
- Re: How to describe location, Brian Tung, 20:21
- Re: Petzval Design?, Brian Tung, 20:07
- Strange Days in Rosamond, Starlord, 19:46
- Re: planet killed! saga of an atm'r (long), John Carruthers, 19:44
- Re: telrad, Stephen Paul, 19:18
- Re: How to describe location, Doink, 19:17
- Re: Petzval Design?, Doink, 18:58
- Re: Petzval Design?, Brian Tung, 18:50
- Re: Petzval Design?, Brian Tung, 18:49
- Petzval Design?, Doink, 18:43
- Re: Big Bang or Big Splat?, Brian Tung, 18:42
- Re: How to describe location, Doink, 18:40
- Re: planet killed! saga of an atm'r (long), Larry G, 18:09
- Re: Get Me Started (again...), starburst, 18:07
- Re: Get Me Started (again...), starburst, 17:43
- SUMMARY: X-ray Event exceeded M5, Sam Wormley, 17:43
- Re: How to describe location, Sam Wormley, 17:42
- Watch, Starlord, 17:28
- Re: accessories, Starlord, 17:25
- EXTENDED WARNING: Geomagnetic K-index of 5 expected, Sam Wormley, 17:18
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, Howard Lester, 17:01
- Re: Big Bang or Big Splat?, Jonathan Bartlett, 16:11
- Re: How to describe location, Marty, 15:38
- Re: How to describe location, Sam Wormley, 15:28
- Re: planet killed! saga of an atm'r (long), RMOLLISE, 14:55
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, tony_flanders, 14:29
- Re: How to describe location, Tom Rankin, 13:23
- Re: accessories, Odysseus, 11:57
- Re: Mirror polishing problem, Intertracer, 11:48
- Re: used scopes, Odysseus, 11:32
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, Ioannis, 11:22
- Re: planet killed! saga of an atm'r (long), Roger Hamlett, 11:08
- Re: How to describe location, Beta Persei, 10:59
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, decaf, 10:59
- Re: planet killed! saga of an atm'r (long), Chris.B, 10:00
- Re: How to describe location, Beta Persei, 09:54
- How to describe location, Doink, 09:35
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, William Hamblen, 08:46
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, William Hamblen, 08:46
- Re: accessories, Starlord, 08:18
- Re: planet killed! saga of an atm'r (long), Starlord, 08:14
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, Brian Tung, 07:04
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, Tom, 07:00
- planet killed! saga of an atm'r (long), starburst, 06:51
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, Chris L Peterson, 06:47
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, BMURF01@xxxxxxxxx, 05:20
- New Yahoo Group Started, StarCrwzr, 03:29
- Re: WOW, starburst, 02:48
- Shuttle Landing Ground Track?, Bubba, 02:07
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, Howard Lester, 01:20
- SN2005cs Visual Observation Report (M51 Supernova), kmmposting, 00:28
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, Tom, 00:26
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, Howard Lester, 00:09
July 12, 2005
- Re: Mirror polishing problem, Chris.B, 23:50
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, Tom, 23:42
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, Chris L Peterson, 23:24
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, Howard Lester, 23:19
- Nova 2005 Sgr #2 - obs rep & charts, canopus56, 23:09
- Re: Get Me Started (again...), Bill Davis Jr, 23:06
- Re: Mirror polishing problem, Bob May, 23:06
- Re: Advice on photo mount please, plasmodium, 22:57
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, Martin Brown, 22:45
- Re: Sidewalk Astronomy = Good Health, Starlord, 22:20
- Re: used scopes, Starlord, 22:14
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, Tom, 21:41
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, tony_flanders, 21:40
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, Chris L Peterson, 21:16
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, decaf, 21:11
- Re: Deep Impact Crater, William C. Keel, 21:05
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, Martin Brown, 20:53
- Re: Deep Impact Crater, Chris L Peterson, 20:50
- Re: Sidewalk Astronomy = Good Health, eddiestardust, 20:41
- Re: Mirror polishing problem, Intertracer, 20:29
- Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics, Tom, 20:23
- Aurora on Saturday Night, Jim Walling, 20:15
- Re: Supernovae - novae - average duration ?, canopus56, 19:39
- Re: Epsilon lyra, Stephen Paul, 19:26
- Re: Mirror polishing problem, Larry G, 18:08
- Re: Mirror polishing problem, MitchAlsup, 18:08
- Re: S&T online article ... help, Brian Tung, 18:01
- Re: Supernovae - novae - average duration ?, Stupendous_Man, 17:53
- Re: used scopes, Zarkovic, 17:47
- Re: Get Me Started (again...), Stephen Paul, 17:03
- Re: used scopes, Starlord, 16:28
- Re: R. Mollise on the run again??, RMOLLISE, 16:12
- Re: R. Mollise on the run again??, RMOLLISE, 16:07
- Re: Mirror polishing problem, Intertracer, 15:37
- Re: Mirror polishing problem, jeff, 15:22
- Re: WOW, tony_flanders, 15:19
- Re: telrad, Florian, 15:17
- WARNING: Geomagnetic K-Index of 6 expected, Sam Wormley, 14:42
- WARNING: Geomagnetic K-Index of 6 expected, Sam Wormley, 14:07
- Seasonal variations /Global Description, geraldkelleher, 14:00
- Re: Mirror polishing problem, Intertracer, 13:13
- Mirror polishing problem, Intertracer, 13:08
- Re: S&T online article ... help, Anthony Ayiomamitis, 12:43
- Re: S&T online article ... help, zgseronik, 12:31
- Re: S&T online article ... help, AFM, 11:48
- Re: S&T online article ... help, Brian Tung, 11:41
- Re: S&T online article ... help, AFM, 11:31
- Re: Revised Milky Way shots from last night, Pete Lawrence, 11:16
- Re: Get Me Started (again...), Roger Hamlett, 10:49
- S&T online article ... help, Anthony Ayiomamitis, 10:33
- Epsilon lyra, Tom, 08:12
- Re: Advice on photo mount please, Phil Smith, 07:54
- Re: Get Me Started (again...), Gregory, 07:39
- Re: Big Bang or Big Splat?, Tim Killian, 06:31
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Joe Bergeron, 06:10
- Re: Get Me Started (again...), Lee Bouknight, 05:01
- Re: Get Me Started (again...), Lee Bouknight, 04:41
- Re: Get Me Started (again...), Lee Bouknight, 04:38
- Re: Advice on photo mount please, techman, 04:30
- Re: Big Bang or Big Splat?, Michael McCulloch, 04:21
- Re: Get Me Started (again...), MonroeAstro, 02:19
- Re: WOW, Chris L Peterson, 02:13
- Re: telrad, Mathias Homann, 02:12
- Re: Advice on photo mount please, Llanzlan Klazmon, 02:00
- Re: WOW, Brian Tung, 01:57
- Re: WOW, David Nakamoto, 01:47
- Re: Model Your Own Climate: edGCM Cooperative Software, OS X and Windows., Ike, 01:14
- Re: WOW, Shawn, 01:09
- Re: Advice on photo mount please, gobbletwo, 01:00
- Re: WOW, Tom Rankin, 00:59
- Re: Get Me Started (again...), matt, 00:49
- Re: Advice on photo mount please, matt, 00:25
- Advice on photo mount please, plasmodium, 00:01
July 11, 2005
- Re: Measuring the Effect of Mirror Flop?, W. Watson, 23:46
- Re: WOW, David Nakamoto, 22:41
- Supernovae - novae - average duration ?, canopus56, 21:30
- Re: Buying a new telescope...LONG, Stephen Paul, 21:04
- Re: Night sky- difference between major cities, fjo324@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:03
- Re: Measuring the Effect of Mirror Flop?, MitchAlsup, 21:01
- Come help us find asteroids, Stu, 20:45
- Re: Revised Milky Way shots from last night, Ike, 20:42
- Re: Hydrogen adsoption lines in quasar spectra (in the sciam special edition summary of galaxy processes), S_chuber_t, 20:28
- Re: Big Bang or Big Splat?, Brian Tung, 20:26
- Sidewalk Astronomy = Good Health, Starlord, 20:09
- Re: Nova Sgr 2005 #2 image/spectrum, canopus56, 19:53
- Re: Big Bang or Big Splat?, Michael McCulloch, 19:46
- Re: Revised Milky Way shots from last night, Michael McCulloch, 19:39
- Re: Big Bang or Big Splat?, Brian Tung, 18:28
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Mark S. Holden, 16:51
- Re: telrad, Morris Jones, 16:42
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, geraldkelleher, 16:33
- Re: Hydrogen adsoption lines in quasar spectra (in the sciam special edition summary of galaxy processes), nytecam, 16:20
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, Paul Schlyter, 16:14
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, Paul Schlyter, 16:14
- Re: Big Bang or Big Splat?, Jonathan Bartlett, 16:05
- Re: WOW, Bob Schmall, 15:55
- Re: R. Mollise on the run again??, tedkord, 15:04
- Re: Deep Impact Crater, Chris L Peterson, 15:02
- Re: Measuring the Effect of Mirror Flop?, Roger Hamlett, 14:55
- Re: WOW, Pierre Vandevenne, 14:21
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, jsavard, 14:21
- Nova Sgr 2005 #2 image/spectrum, nytecam, 14:01
- Re: diffraction spikes from a square aperture, Havriliak, 13:52
- Re: diffraction spikes from a square aperture, david . randellnospam, 13:17
- Re: WOW, Linus Das, 12:27
- Re: diffraction spikes from a square aperture, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:14
- Re: Measuring the Effect of Mirror Flop?, W. Watson, 11:50
- Re: WOW, Nostromozar, 10:46
- diffraction spikes, david . randellnospam, 10:04
- Re: Mars Closeness--The Message The Refuses to Die, David Nakamoto, 09:47
- Re: WOW, David Nakamoto, 09:46
- Re: Mars Closeness--The Message The Refuses to Die, Who, 08:21
- Good to be Back!, Starlord, 08:04
- Re: Mars Closeness--The Message The Refuses to Die, CLT, 05:48
- Re: Measuring the Effect of Mirror Flop?, Chris L Peterson, 05:33
- Re: South Texas (Low Latitutde) Observing Sites, PJ, 05:30
- Re: Buying a new telescope...LONG, Mark D, 05:13
- Mars Closeness--The Message The Refuses to Die, W. Watson, 04:52
- Re: Measuring the Effect of Mirror Flop?, W. Watson, 04:45
- Re: telrad, Florian, 03:58
- Re: telrad, William Hamblen, 03:46
- Re: Get Me Started (again...), AFM, 03:21
- Re: Hydrogen adsoption lines in quasar spectra (in the sciam special edition summary of galaxy processes), CLT, 03:14
- Re: Buying a new telescope...LONG, Gregory, 01:21
- Re: Hydrogen adsoption lines in quasar spectra (in the sciam special edition summary of galaxy processes), S_chuber_t, 01:09
- Re: Get Me Started (again...), Gregory, 00:59
- Re: R. Mollise on the run again??, Ed T, 00:55
- Re: WOW, OG, 00:50
- Re: Follow my logic here.., Matthew Ota, 00:30
- Re: Follow my logic here.., Matthew Ota, 00:29
- Re: WOW, Hilton Evans, 00:25
- Re: WOW, Llanzlan Klazmon, 00:11
July 10, 2005
- Re: Starware--Harington's Website?, Klaatu, 23:58
- Re: R. Mollise on the run again??, Bob Schmall, 23:51
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Mark S. Holden, 23:45
- Re: WOW, Starlord, 23:44
- Re: R. Mollise on the run again??, Ike, 23:34
- Re: If You Want Ridiculous..., T.T., 23:24
- Re: Hydrogen adsoption lines in quasar spectra (in the sciam special edition summary of galaxy processes), S_chuber_t, 23:23
- Re: Hydrogen adsoption lines in quasar spectra (in the sciam special edition summary of galaxy processes), Martin Brown, 23:10
- Re: Get Me Started (again...), Stephen Paul, 23:07
- Re: If You Want Ridiculous..., Eric, 23:06
- Re: Measuring the Effect of Mirror Flop?, Roger Hamlett, 22:40
- Starware--Harington's Website?, W. Watson, 22:38
- Re: WOW, Mark F., 22:33
- Re: South Texas (Low Latitutde) Observing Sites, Florian, 22:25
- Re: R. Mollise on the run again??, Joe S., 22:22
- Re: R. Mollise on the run again??, Ed T, 22:09
- Re: telrad, Doink, 22:04
- Re: WOW, Starlord, 21:57
- Re: Get Me Started (again...), Lee Bouknight, 21:57
- Re: Buying a new telescope...LONG, Starlord, 21:55
- Re: Rosamond's Sky, Starlord, 21:52
- telrad, Zarkovic, 21:47
- Re: Buying a new telescope...LONG, Zarkovic, 21:38
- Re: a lil update, Zarkovic, 21:31
- Re: a lil update, Doink, 21:17
- Re: WOW, Shawn, 21:16
- Re: Hydrogen adsoption lines in quasar spectra (in the sciam special edition summary of galaxy processes), Doink, 21:11
- Re: solar polar prom persists, Coppy Littlehouse, 21:06
- Re: Hydrogen adsoption lines in quasar spectra (in the sciam special edition summary of galaxy processes), Chris L Peterson, 20:36
- Re: diffraction spikes from a square aperture, Chris L Peterson, 20:31
- Re: Rosamond's Sky, G.T., 20:13
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, geraldkelleher, 20:04
- Re: SkyChart III minor queries, Larry Stedman, 19:59
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, William Hamblen, 19:46
- Re: Buying a new telescope...LONG, Starlord, 19:43
- Re: Rosamond's Sky, Starlord, 19:39
- Re: Hydrogen adsoption lines in quasar spectra (in the sciam special edition summary of galaxy processes), nytecam, 19:30
- South Texas (Low Latitutde) Observing Sites, ddickers, 19:23
- R. Mollise on the run again??, Ike, 19:09
- Re: diffraction spikes from a square aperture, nytecam, 19:09
- Re: WOW, Doink, 19:01
- Re: diffraction spikes from a square aperture, Brian Tung, 18:57
- new 5-inch refractor Yahoo! group, PJ, 18:55
- Re: Buying a new telescope...LONG, Zarkovic, 18:50
- Re: Rosamond's Sky, Chris.B, 18:46
- Re: Astro Photography with X-10?, tasty, 18:43
- Re: Deep Impact Report from NASA, Ike, 18:24
- Re: Deep Impact posts, Ike, 18:23
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, katrinaxx, 18:04
- WOW, Starlord, 17:52
- Re: Rosamond's Sky, Starlord, 17:25
- Measuring the Effect of Mirror Flop?, W. Watson, 16:15
- Hydrogen adsoption lines in quasar spectra (in the sciam special edition summary of galaxy processes), S_chuber_t, 15:42
- diffraction spikes from a square aperture, david . randellnospam, 15:31
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, geraldkelleher, 15:27
- If You Want Ridiculous..., jsavard, 15:18
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, geraldkelleher, 15:09
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, jsavard, 15:04
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, jsavard, 15:02
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, jsavard, 14:59
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, jsavard, 14:57
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, jsavard, 14:54
- Re: Buying a new telescope...LONG, Larry Stedman, 14:26
- Re: Get Me Started (again...), Bill Davis Jr, 14:13
- Re: Follow my logic here.., Martin Brown, 13:43
- Re: a lil update, AM, 13:08
- solar polar prom persists, nytecam, 11:57
- a lil update, Zarkovic, 11:15
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, Jim, 10:21
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, Paul Schlyter, 09:44
- Re: Rosamond's Sky, Chris.B, 08:43
- Astro Photography with X-10?, Doink, 08:24
- The Last Great Walk, Starlord, 08:23
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, geraldkelleher, 08:23
- Re: Buying a new telescope...suggestions welcome, Starlord, 08:19
- Re: Three moons, Bob May, 07:50
- SS2k/GP use in ALT/AZ or X/Y mode, szaki, 07:10
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Davoud, 06:15
- Re: 5-6" f/5 Refractor?, Doink, 04:54
- Re: Buying a new telescope...suggestions welcome, Duke, 04:19
- Re: Buying a new telescope...suggestions welcome, Jon Kickerston, 04:18
- Re: Buying a new telescope...suggestions welcome, Doink, 03:55
- Re: Rosamond's Sky, William Hamblen, 03:46
- Buying a new telescope...suggestions welcome, Zarkovic, 03:17
- Re: Rosamond's Sky, Starlord, 02:26
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, tasty, 02:05
- Re: Three moons, CLT, 01:30
- Re: Get Me Started (again...), Jan Owen, 00:39
- Re: Rosamond's Sky, Chris.B, 00:06
- Re: 5-6" f/5 Refractor?, Stephen Paul, 00:03
July 09, 2005
- Re: Get Me Started (again...), AFM, 23:21
- Re: Celestron CG-4 or Orion EQ-3 polar axis question, G.T., 23:11
- Get Me Started (again...), Lee Bouknight, 22:44
- Re: Celestron CG-4 or Orion EQ-3 polar axis question, Paul Buglass, 22:39
- Re: Three moons, Ernie, 22:38
- Re: Optical illusions, geraldkelleher, 22:32
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, geraldkelleher, 22:18
- Re: Three moons, David Nakamoto, 22:10
- Re: Three moons, Brian Tung, 22:04
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, geraldkelleher, 21:55
- Re: Deep Impact posts, Sam Wormley, 21:44
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, Paul Hirose, 20:56
- Re: Dual Drive Question, Doink, 20:44
- Re: Follow my logic here.., Mark F., 20:37
- Celestron CG-4 or Orion EQ-3 polar axis question, G.T., 20:32
- Re: Three moons, Glenn Holliday, 20:31
- Re: Follow my logic here.., Glenn Holliday, 20:16
- Optical illusions, Florian, 19:43
- Dual Drive Question, Mike Jenkins, 18:53
- Night sky- difference between major cities, Buck, 18:52
- Re: Three moons, Norbert, 18:38
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, Pat Wallace, 18:08
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Mark S. Holden, 18:08
- Re: Follow my logic here.., Tim Auton, 17:42
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, Pat Wallace, 17:37
- Three moons, Mark, 17:30
- Re: Follow my logic here.., Mark F., 17:20
- Re: Follow my logic here.., Mark F., 17:20
- Deep Impact posts, Bob Schmall, 17:05
- Deep Impact Report from NASA, Bob Schmall, 16:55
- Re: Rosamond's Sky, Starlord, 16:39
- Re: Follow my logic here.., Starlord, 16:29
- Re: Stupid XEphem question, Mika Yrjola, 16:22
- Re: Follow my logic here.., Sam Wormley, 15:41
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, Happy Trails, 14:51
- Re: Follow my logic here.., Mark F., 14:48
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, Happy Trails, 14:41
- Re: Rosamond's Sky, AM, 14:36
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, jimirwin, 14:23
- Re: Meade RCX Review, Hilton Evans, 13:38
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, Paul Schlyter, 13:13
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, geraldkelleher, 12:01
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, Paul Schlyter, 11:43
- Re: Follow my logic here.., szaki, 11:42
- Re: Follow my logic here.., Roger Hamlett, 10:56
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, Dave Baker, 10:28
- Re: Follow my logic here.., szaki, 10:23
- Re: 5-6" f/5 Refractor?, szaki, 10:15
- Re: 5-6" f/5 Refractor?, szaki, 10:11
- Re: The Deed is Done, John Carruthers, 09:45
- Re: 5-6" f/5 Refractor?, Doink, 09:22
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, Marc Brett, 09:12
- Re: 5-6" f/5 Refractor?, RMOLLISE, 07:00
- Re: Follow my logic here.., RMOLLISE, 06:58
- Re: The Deed is Done, Starlord, 05:47
- Follow my logic here.., Mark F., 05:46
- Re: The Deed is Done, Wayne Howell, 05:39
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, Drew, 05:37
- 5-6" f/5 Refractor?, Doink, 05:03
- Observing Moon and Venus, Glenn Holliday, 04:49
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, Dave Baker, 04:45
- Re: The Deed is Done, Tom Hise, 04:44
- The Deed is Done, Starlord, 04:34
- Need an influx of new membership, Stu, 04:12
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, jtaylor, 04:02
- Re: getting 2x magnification from Televue 3x?, William Hamblen, 02:46
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Starlord, 01:24
July 08, 2005
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, eawckyegcy, 23:57
- Re: Ann: LunarPhase Pro V2.23 Released, gnugent, 23:31
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, geraldkelleher, 23:02
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, Chris L Peterson, 22:33
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, geraldkelleher, 22:29
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, eawckyegcy, 22:03
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, geraldkelleher, 21:55
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, Sam Wormley, 21:50
- Re: Orion posts 150mm Mak, 80 mm F/6, David Nakamoto, 21:44
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, Pierre Vandevenne, 21:36
- SkyChart III minor queries, robertleigh456, 21:15
- Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, geraldkelleher, 21:15
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Brian Tung, 21:01
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Howard Lester, 20:57
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Michael McCulloch, 20:51
- About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomy, Chris Steyaert, 20:48
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Chris L Peterson, 20:48
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Howard Lester, 20:44
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Brian Tung, 20:17
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, rick_evans033050, 20:15
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Chris L Peterson, 19:59
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Chris L Peterson, 19:58
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Davoud, 19:52
- Re: Ozone Hole at the North Pole, Ed Majden, 19:39
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Chris L Peterson, 19:24
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Brian Tung, 19:11
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Brian Tung, 19:07
- Re: Pic - Mercury, Venus and the Moon, Norbert, 18:44
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Chris L Peterson, 18:43
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Michael McCulloch, 18:40
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Chris L Peterson, 18:25
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Brian Tung, 18:14
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Brian Tung, 18:03
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Hilton Evans, 17:51
- Re: Orion posts 150mm Mak, 80 mm F/6, Stephen Paul, 17:42
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Chris L Peterson, 17:34
- Re: Orion posts 150mm Mak, 80 mm F/6, matt, 17:27
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Chris L Peterson, 17:24
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Davoud, 17:06
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Mark S. Holden, 16:33
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Chris L Peterson, 16:19
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Chris L Peterson, 16:02
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Davoud, 15:56
- Re: Rosamond's Sky, Starlord, 15:37
- hand-like prominence on sun today, nytecam, 12:15
- Re: Shelf life: Paul Davies, Tristram Brelstaff, 09:25
- Re: Shelf life: Paul Davies, Larry, 08:47
- Re: Rosamond's Sky, Larry, 08:44
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Starlord, 07:35
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Davoud, 07:02
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Mij Adyaw, 06:40
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Chris L Peterson, 06:38
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Davoud, 06:25
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Chris L Peterson, 06:22
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Mij Adyaw, 05:42
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Chris L Peterson, 05:11
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Davoud, 05:09
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Tom Hise, 05:05
- Pic - Mercury, Venus and the Moon, Mark, 04:34
- Re: Orion posts 150mm Mak, 80 mm F/6, David Nakamoto, 03:09
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Tim Auton, 02:41
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Brian Tung, 02:36
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Llanzlan Klazmon, 02:29
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Chris L Peterson, 02:29
- Re: Mount Question, Szaki, 02:21
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Mij Adyaw, 02:01
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Chris L Peterson, 01:10
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Mij Adyaw, 01:08
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Davoud, 01:06
- Re: Shelf life: Paul Davies, markdemers15, 01:04
- Re: Orion posts 150mm Mak, 80 mm F/6, Richard Carlson, 00:16
July 07, 2005
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Chris L Peterson, 23:30
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Starlord, 23:23
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, offaxis2, 23:09
- Re: Shelf life: Paul Davies, richard miller, 22:32
- Re: Shelf life: Paul Davies, Mark Martin, 21:57
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Mij Adyaw, 21:48
- Re: Shelf life: Paul Davies, richard miller, 21:04
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, Chris L Peterson, 20:31
- hand-like prominence on sun today, nytecam, 20:05
- Re: Mount Question, Mike Jenkins, 19:53
- Re: Mount Question, Mike Jenkins, 19:41
- Re: John Dobson Documentary Opens Today in Manhattan, Starlord, 19:22
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, David G. Fitzgerald, 19:18
- Re: Mount Question, Doink, 18:49
- Re: Ann: LunarPhase Pro V2.23 Released, No Name Available, 18:46
- Re: Orion posts 150mm Mak, 80 mm F/6, Ed T, 18:40
- Re: Astro Imaging newbie -- Film or CCD, laura halliday, 18:12
- Re: Mount Question, Roger Hamlett, 18:09
- Mount Question, Mike Jenkins, 17:43
- Re: Update: Babylon 8, Starlord, 17:37
- Re: Update: Babylon 8, Starlord, 17:33
- Re: Rosamond's Sky, Starlord, 17:30
- Re: Orion posts 150mm Mak, 80 mm F/6, Stephen Paul, 17:25
- Re: Astro Imaging newbie -- Film or CCD, Stephen Paul, 17:11
- Re: Rosamond's Sky, WA2GUF, 16:32
- Re: Update: Babylon 8, WA2GUF, 16:21
- Re: Update: Babylon 8, Jax, 15:43
- Shelf life: Paul Davies, Sam Wormley, 14:17
- Re: Update: Babylon 8, Mary, 09:19
- Re: Deep Impact Resolution, Mary, 09:15
- Re: Orion posts 150mm Mak, 80 mm F/6, Mary, 09:10
- Re: Orion posts 150mm Mak, 80 mm F/6, Mary, 09:09
- Re: Deep Impact Report, Mary, 09:06
- Re: Deep Impact - Data Integrity, Mary, 08:59
- Rosamond's Sky, Starlord, 08:21
- Re: Orion posts 150mm Mak, 80 mm F/6, Doink, 06:51
- Re: Update: Babylon 8, Mark F., 05:55
- Re: Orion posts 150mm Mak, 80 mm F/6, Len Philpot, 05:48
- Re: Update: Babylon 8, Starlord, 05:32
- Re: Astro Imaging newbie -- Film or CCD, MonroeAstro, 03:51
- Re: Update: Babylon 8, Florian, 03:44
- Re: Einstein's gravity and SOHO images, Shawn, 03:13
- Ann: LunarPhase Pro V2.23 Released, gnugent, 03:12
- Update: Babylon 8, Starlord, 03:10
- Re: Rosamond Night Lights, Starlord, 02:50
- Re: Anyone Know of Historic Meteor Finds in the Yellowstone/Teton Areas?, W. Watson, 02:32
- Re: How can my software know when a LX200 has finished slewing?, Pierre Vandevenne, 01:28
- Re: Deep Impact Resolution, Linus Das, 01:17
- Re: Deep Impact Resolution, Bob Schmall, 00:41
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, matt, 00:21
- Re: USNO A2 Catalog - where to get in Australia, Fritz Lang, 00:18
- Re: What 50 mm eyepiece?, Doink, 00:12
July 06, 2005
- Re: TelescopeS.com, Doink, 23:54
- Re: How can my software know when a LX200 has finished slewing?, CarnMeynen, 23:49
- Re: TelescopeS.com, MitchAlsup, 23:28
- Re: What 50 mm eyepiece?, Beta Persei, 23:21
- What 50 mm eyepiece?, Mario Morales, 22:23
- Re: Deep Impact Resolution, Ike, 22:13
- Re: Deep Impact Resolution, Greg Crinklaw, 22:02
- Re: Orion posts 150mm Mak, 80 mm F/6, Ed T, 21:51
- Deep Impact Resolution, Mark P., 21:49
- Re: How can my software know when a LX200 has finished slewing?, CarnMeynen, 21:47
- Re: help - trivia question!, spider_and_i, 20:03
- Re: homemade filter wheel/ slider plans??, Mike Seiberg, 19:38
- Re: Orion's Stratus Eyepieces, Doink, 19:00
- Re: Anyone Know of Historic Meteor Finds in the Yellowstone/Teton Areas?, Tom Randy, 18:13
- Re: Rosamond Night Lights, Martin R. Howell, 17:27
- Re: Astro Imaging newbie -- Film or CCD, Stephen Paul, 17:21
- Re: Deep Impact Report, Nate Perkins, 17:16
- Lens design software updates, Jan, 16:46
- Re: Deep Impact / Tempel 1 Observation, shneor, 16:24
- Re: Digital Images to 35mm Slides?, W. Watson, 16:23
- Re: Astro Imaging newbie -- Film or CCD, MonroeAstro, 16:15
- Re: Astro Imaging newbie -- Film or CCD, Pfudrucker, 16:11
- Re: Rosamond Night Lights, Starlord, 16:00
- Re: Orion posts 150mm Mak, 80 mm F/6, Dave Jessie, 14:36
- Re: B-W Optik 30mm UW, Frank Hofmann, 14:23
- Re: USNO A2 Catalog - where to get in Australia, cisamcgu, 11:51
- Re: Early heliocentricity, Harry F . Leopold, 10:45
- Re: Astro Imaging newbie -- Film or CCD, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx, 10:02
- Re: Astro Imaging newbie -- Film or CCD, justbeats, 09:47
- Re: help - trivia question!, JXStern, 09:26
- Re: Rosamond Night Lights, Martin R. Howell, 08:22
- Re: Orion posts 150mm Mak, 80 mm F/6, ValeryD, 07:49
- Rosamond Night Lights, Starlord, 07:44
- Re: "C" thread to flange and one other adapter source??, canopus56, 07:29
- Re: Orion posts 150mm Mak, 80 mm F/6, David Nakamoto, 07:26
- Re: Orion posts 150mm Mak, 80 mm F/6, Darian, 06:43
- Re: Digital Images to 35mm Slides?, Mark S. Holden, 06:33
- Re: help - trivia question!, Brian Tung, 06:31
- show us the money, Ike, 06:11
- Re: Digital Images to 35mm Slides?, W. Watson, 06:10
- TelescopeS.com, Doink, 05:41
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, Chris L Peterson, 05:36
- Re: Eyepieces, Doink, 05:35
- Re: Orion posts 150mm Mak, 80 mm F/6, Stephen Paul, 04:25
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, Rob Johnson, 04:21
- Re: Digital Images to 35mm Slides?, W. Watson, 04:01
- Re: Digital Images to 35mm Slides?, Mark S. Holden, 03:16
- Re: "Deep Impact" mission; designed to deceive?, Gold_Star, 03:14
- Re: help - trivia question!, Kelly Beatty, 02:58
- Re: Astro Imaging newbie -- Film or CCD, tasty, 02:24
- Re: Real time solar images, tasty, 02:18
- Re: Digital Images to 35mm Slides?, Brian Tung, 01:57
- Eyepieces, Starlord, 01:48
- Orion posts 150mm Mak, 80 mm F/6, jt, 01:48
- Re: Digital Images to 35mm Slides?, Mark S. Holden, 01:09
- Re: Digital Images to 35mm Slides?, W. Watson, 01:00
- Re: Astro Imaging newbie -- Film or CCD, T.T., 00:49
- Re: "C" thread to flange and one other adapter source??, Doink, 00:44
- Re: Astro Imaging newbie -- Film or CCD, Havriliak, 00:40
- Re: Astro Imaging newbie -- Film or CCD, Chris L Peterson, 00:36
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, Chris L Peterson, 00:09
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, Fritz Lang, 00:08
- Astro Imaging newbie -- Film or CCD, MonroeAstro, 00:01
- "C" thread to flange and one other adapter source??, Jason Ada, 00:01
July 05, 2005
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, Stephen Paul, 23:20
- Re: Deep Impact / Tempel 1 Observation, niiicholas, 23:09
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, John C, 23:04
- Re: Deep Impact / Tempel 1 Observation, Michael McCulloch, 22:12
- Re: Deep Impact / Tempel 1 Observation, David Nakamoto, 21:59
- Re: Deep Impact / Tempel 1 Observation, Morris Jones, 21:58
- Re: War of the worlds., Starlord, 21:49
- Re: Digital Images to 35mm Slides?, Mark S. Holden, 21:08
- Re: fight around M11, manastro, 21:01
- Re: fight around M11, manastro, 21:00
- Re: fight around M11, manastro, 20:59
- Re: Digital Images to 35mm Slides?, W. Watson, 20:04
- Re: How can my software know when a LX200 has finished slewing?, Brian Tung, 19:59
- Re: Digital Images to 35mm Slides?, Chris L Peterson, 19:47
- Re: Digital Images to 35mm Slides?, rls2b, 19:47
- Re: Digital Images to 35mm Slides?, Malcolm Stewart, 19:44
- Digital Images to 35mm Slides?, W. Watson, 19:20
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, Mark S. Holden, 19:20
- Re: Deep Impact - Data Integrity, Stephen Paul, 19:09
- Re: Deep Impact / Tempel 1 Observation, niiicholas, 19:04
- Re: help - trivia question!, Brian Tung, 18:11
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, lal_truckee, 18:05
- Re: Deep Impact: From Flagstaff, AZ (USA), Morris Jones, 17:53
- Re: Starry Night Pro 3.12, Mij Adyaw, 17:51
- Re: War of the worlds., Mark, 16:52
- HUBBLE CAPTURES DEEP IMPACT'S COLLISION WITH A COMET (STScI-PRC05-17), INBOX ASTRONOMY : NEWS ALERT, 16:29
- Re: Deep Impact / Tempel 1 Observation, shneor, 16:20
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, szaki, 15:02
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, Mark S. Holden, 14:34
- Re: Deep Impact Report, P J Tramdack, 14:13
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, Mark S. Holden, 13:53
- Re: Real time solar images, Tom Randy, 12:34
- Re: USNO A2 Catalog - where to get in Australia, Fritz Lang, 11:48
- Re: Early heliocentricity, geraldkelleher, 11:45
- Re: USNO A2 Catalog - where to get in Australia, cisamcgu, 11:30
- Re: Early heliocentricity, geraldkelleher, 11:24
- Re: Deep Impact / Tempel 1 Observation, David Nakamoto, 10:38
- Re: fight around M11, Uwe Schürkamp, 10:11
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, AFM, 10:03
- Re: How can my software know when a LX200 has finished slewing?, Martin Brown, 09:57
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, szaki, 08:54
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, szaki, 08:52
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, szaki, 08:48
- Re: Natural outgassing, CLT, 08:35
- Re: Deep Impact - Data Integrity, CLT, 08:34
- Re: War of the worlds., Starlord, 07:56
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, Gregory, 07:55
- Re: B.S. media hype surround, JOHN PAZMINO, 07:24
- Re: Starry Night Pro 3.12, JOHN PAZMINO, 07:24
- Re: dark matter lecture, JOHN PAZMINO, 07:24
- 3 Planets, 1 FOV, JOHN PAZMINO, 07:24
- Re: Paul Rini Optics, John McVey, 07:12
- Re: Deep Impact Report, Wendel Sykes, 07:07
- Re: Early heliocentricity, Wendel Sykes, 07:04
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, Chris L Peterson, 07:04
- Re: Natural outgassing, Wendel Sykes, 06:59
- Re: Mars is up, Uncle Bob, 06:57
- Re: Deep Impact - Data Integrity, Wendel Sykes, 06:56
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, Gregory, 06:51
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, Mark S. Holden, 06:15
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, AFM, 06:14
- The face of the EEL, ROC, 06:13
- Re: Deep Impact Report--UB, Doink, 06:05
- Re: Deep Impact Report, Uncle Bob, 05:58
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, Chris L Peterson, 05:52
- Re: War of the worlds., William Hamblen, 05:46
- Re: How can my software know when a LX200 has finished slewing?, Chris L Peterson, 05:46
- Re: How can my software know when a LX200 has finished slewing?, CarnMeynen, 05:27
- Re: Deep Impact: From Flagstaff, AZ (USA), shneor, 05:05
- Re: War of the worlds., Mark, 05:02
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, Gregory, 04:55
- USNO A2 Catalog - where to get in Australia, Fritz Lang, 04:50
- Re: help - trivia question!, Florian, 03:56
- Re: help - trivia question!, spider_and_i, 03:38
- Re: War of the worlds., lal_truckee, 03:25
- Re: help - trivia question!, Florian, 03:10
- Re: War of the worlds., Starlord, 03:04
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, Mark S. Holden, 02:55
- Re: impact movie, David G. Nagel, 02:42
- Re: help - trivia question!, spider_and_i, 02:38
- Re: War of the worlds., Mark F., 02:26
- Re: Deep Impact: From Flagstaff, AZ (USA), BillFerris, 02:02
- Re: Newsgroup Help, Sam Wormley, 02:00
- Re: Early heliocentricity, CLT, 01:56
- Re: War of the worlds., Chris L Peterson, 01:55
- Re: Eyepieces and barlow for 14 inch f4.8 Newt/Dob, ., 01:41
- Re: Deep Impact / Tempel 1 Observation, Greg Crinklaw, 01:38
- Re: Early heliocentricity, Sam Wormley, 01:25
- Re: Deep Impact / Tempel 1 Observation, fredfighter, 01:19
- Re: fight around M11, CLT, 01:11
- Re: Kitt Peak, CLT, 01:03
- Re: Kitt Peak, CLT, 01:01
- Re: Kitt Peak, ROC, 00:54
- Re: Kitt Peak, ROC, 00:54
- Re: Early heliocentricity, Jim Attfield, 00:42
- Re: War of the worlds., Starlord, 00:05
July 04, 2005
- Deep Impact Report, Doink, 23:43
- Re: Kitt Peak, CLT, 23:41
- Early heliocentricity, geraldkelleher, 23:38
- Thanks Bill, Doink, 23:37
- Re: Newsgroup Help, Bill Becker, 23:29
- Newsgroup Help, Doink, 23:26
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, Gregory, 23:18
- Re: Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, Chris L Peterson, 22:59
- Re: War of the worlds., Chris.B, 22:49
- Re: Deep Impact: From Flagstaff, AZ (USA), BillFerris, 22:33
- Re: Deep Impact - Data Integrity, Greg Crinklaw, 22:32
- Re: Supernova 2005cs in M51, Florian, 22:31
- Digital SLR vs. dedicated Astro CCD Camera, Gregory, 22:27
- Re: Supernova 2005cs in M51, Bill Becker, 22:27
- Re: Supernova 2005cs in M51, Robert Sheaffer, 22:20
- Re: Kitt Peak, Greg Crinklaw, 22:19
- Re: Deep Impact / Tempel 1 Observation, Robert Sheaffer, 22:13
- Re: Temple 1 observer guide, Ike, 21:40
- Re: Kitt Peak, Ike, 21:31
- Re: Kitt Peak, Steven, 21:26
- impact movie, Ike, 21:09
- Re: fight around M11, Florian, 20:31
- fight around M11, manastro, 20:21
- Anyone Know of Historic Meteor Finds in the Yellowstone/Teton Areas?, W. Watson, 20:10
- Re: Is this group Up? IGNORE, CLT, 19:56
- Re: Green Kat Hand Telescope Help, CLT, 19:53
- Is this group Up? IGNORE, Doink, 19:43
- Re: Deep Impact - Data Integrity, CLT, 19:34
- Re: Natural outgassing, Chris McMahan, 19:33
- Sometimes you just get lucky, -JATO, 19:22
- Real time solar images, -JATO, 19:22
- Re: saa Wiki???, Gareth Slee, 19:11
- Re: Deep Impact: From Flagstaff, AZ (USA), Morris Jones, 18:53
- area of impact, Ike, 18:53
- Kitt Peak, Ike, 18:33
- Natural outgassing, Ike, 18:24
- Re: accruate "sundials", geraldkelleher, 18:00
- Re: "Deep Impact" mission; designed to deceive?, AstroHoney, 17:59
- Deep Impact: From Flagstaff, AZ (USA), BillFerris, 17:55
- saa Wiki???, Gareth Slee, 17:31
- Re: Deep Impact. Where are the pics of the POST-impact site?, Roger Hamlett, 17:21
- Re: Deep Impact - Data Integrity, Chris L Peterson, 17:10
- Re: Deep Impact - Data Integrity, Martin Brown, 17:03
- Re: Deep Impact spacecraft imaged?, gubbenimanen, 17:03
- Re: Deep Impact / Tempel 1 Observation, nytecam, 17:02
- Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact", geraldkelleher, 17:01
- Planetary Astronomers, geraldkelleher, 16:56
- Re: Deep Impact - Data Integrity, Florian, 16:46
- Re: Observing Book?, Larry Stedman, 16:46
- Deep Impact - Data Integrity, Stephen Paul, 16:40
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, Chris L Peterson, 16:37
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, Chris L Peterson, 16:36
- Re: Anyone Using the Sony Handycam Digital 8 for Astronomy?, geraldkelleher, 16:21
- Re: Deep Impact. Where are the pics of the POST-impact site?, Bob Schmall, 16:14
- Deep Impact. Where are the pics of the POST-impact site?, J.Warren, 16:07
- Green Kat Hand Telescope Help, crescent_au, 15:45
- Re: Deep Impact / Tempel 1 Observation, Davoud, 15:11
- Re: "Deep Impact" mission; designed to deceive?, Gold_Star, 14:54
- Re: "Deep Impact" mission; designed to deceive?, Gold_Star, 14:53
- Re: "Deep Impact" mission; designed to deceive?, Gold_Star, 14:52
- Re: "Deep Impact" mission; designed to deceive?, Gold_Star, 14:51
- Re: "Deep Impact" mission; designed to deceive?, Gold_Star, 14:49
- Re: Are you a DirecTV subscriber? Take 2 minutes and do me a favor, Louis WU, 14:27
- Re: War of the worlds., Davoud, 14:26
- Re: War of the worlds., Anti-Collectivist, 13:00
- Re: War of the worlds., Anti-Collectivist, 12:58
- Re: War of the worlds., Anti-Collectivist, 12:55
- Re: War of the worlds., Anti-Collectivist, 12:52
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, Anti-Collectivist, 12:51
- Re: logarithmic image???, Martin Brown, 12:48
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, Martin Brown, 12:37
- Re: "Deep Impact" mission; designed to deceive?, Martin Brown, 12:19
- BBC 1 @ 11.45 this morning -Deep Impact, nytecam, 12:03
- Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact", Martin Brown, 11:49
- Re: Are you a DirecTV subscriber? Take 2 minutes and do me a favor, TheOvavas, 11:00
- Deep Impact / Tempel 1 Observation, Jeff R. Schroeder, 10:59
- Re: War of the worlds., TheOvavas, 10:55
- Re: Temple 1 observer guide, TheOvavas, 10:52
- Re: War of the worlds., Uwe Schürkamp, 10:45
- Re: "Deep Impact" mission; designed to deceive?, TheOvavas, 10:44
- Re: Tempel 1 - How much magnification?, TheOvavas, 10:40
- Re: Rini optics, TheOvavas, 10:39
- Re: Deep Impact Magnitude, TheOvavas, 10:38
- Re: Deep Impact Magnitude, TheOvavas, 10:37
- Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact", TheOvavas, 10:36
- Re: Supernova 2005cs in M51, TheOvavas, 10:32
- Re: Supernova 2005cs in M51, TheOvavas, 10:29
- Re: Anyone check out the Celestron CPC scopes yet?, TheOvavas, 10:28
- Re: Estimating comet magnitudes - brightness (long), TheOvavas, 10:27
- Re: deep impact - small telescope program, TheOvavas, 10:24
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, TheOvavas, 10:23
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, TheOvavas, 10:23
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, TheOvavas, 10:21
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, TheOvavas, 10:20
- Re: Einstein's gravity and SOHO images, TheOvavas, 10:16
- Re: Anyone Using the Sony Handycam Digital 8 for Astronomy?, Chi-hung Yeung, 10:12
- Re: WebCams for Planets?, Robin Leadbeater, 10:03
- Are you a DirecTV subscriber? Take 2 minutes and do me a favor, cje, 09:58
- Re: War of the worlds., Chris.B, 09:37
- Re: "Deep Impact" mission; designed to deceive?, thad, 09:22
- No sign of Tempel! (o:, szaki, 08:52
- Re: Temple 1 observer guide, Kevin, 08:51
- Re: War of the worlds., szaki, 08:48
- Re: Temple 1 observer guide, Stuart Levy, 07:36
- Re: War of the worlds., Sam Wormley, 06:59
- War of the worlds., Mark F., 06:53
- Kit peak Deep Impact images, ROC, 06:32
- Re: help - trivia question!, Sam Wormley, 06:28
- Re: Eyepieces and barlow for 14 inch f4.8 Newt/Dob, Martin R. Howell, 06:23
- Impactor velocity, ROC, 06:17
- Re: "Deep Impact" mission; designed to deceive?, AstroHoney, 06:00
- Re: help - trivia question!, Chris L Peterson, 05:08
- Re: help - trivia question!, spider_and_i, 05:02
- Re: help - trivia question!, Jeff R, 04:57
- Re: help - trivia question!, Greg Crinklaw, 04:53
- Re: logarithmic image???, Steve Smith, 04:50
- Re: help - trivia question!, Greg Crinklaw, 04:48
- Re: help - trivia question!, Jan Owen, 04:33
- Re: help - trivia question!, Tom Hise, 04:32
- Re: "Deep Impact" mission; designed to deceive?, RichA, 04:29
- Re: help - trivia question!, spider_and_i, 04:08
- Re: help - trivia question!, Sam Wormley, 03:56
- Re: help - trivia question!, T.T., 03:55
- Re: help - trivia question!, Florian, 03:31
- help - trivia question!, spider_and_i, 03:14
- Re: comet?, Mark F., 02:54
- Re: Eyepieces and barlow for 14 inch f4.8 Newt/Dob, ., 02:36
- Re: Deep Impact T-Bone, pay1439, 02:34
- Weather & Mirror grinding???, Starlord, 01:34
- Re: "Deep Impact" mission; designed to deceive?, Starlord, 01:27
July 03, 2005
- Re: Where Get Teflon?, chris . b, 23:46
- Re: logarithmic image???, Chris L Peterson, 23:42
- logarithmic image???, Ike, 23:25
- Re: "Deep Impact" mission; designed to deceive?, Ike, 23:02
- Re: WebCams for Planets?, Bob May, 22:58
- Re: comet?, Bob May, 22:53
- Re: Question on the new Celestron CPC series of scopes, Roger Hamlett, 22:30
- Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact", William C. Keel, 21:53
- Re: comet?, Skylook123, 21:52
- Re: "Deep Impact" mission; designed to deceive?, RichA, 21:32
- Deep Impact spacecraft imaged?, gubbenimanen, 21:03
- Re: Observing Book?, Bill Tschumy, 20:57
- Re: WebCams for Planets?, J.Warren, 20:51
- Question on the new Celestron CPC series of scopes, J.Warren, 20:48
- Re: Where Get Teflon?, laura halliday, 20:44
- Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact", AstroHoney, 20:44
- Re: accruate "sundials", jtaylor, 20:32
- Re: Anyone Using the Sony Handycam Digital 8 for Astronomy?, W. Watson, 19:40
- Temple 1 observer guide, Ike, 19:39
- Re: Anyone Using the Sony Handycam Digital 8 for Astronomy?, geraldkelleher, 19:27
- Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact", Pierre Vandevenne, 19:07
- Anyone Using the Sony Handycam Digital 8 for Astronomy?, W. Watson, 18:25
- Re: Where Get Teflon?, W. Watson, 18:23
- Re: Where Get Teflon?, W. Watson, 18:22
- Re: "Deep Impact" mission; designed to deceive?, allisonki, 17:57
- Re: Comet Spotted in record time---for me, Mij Adyaw, 17:24
- Re: homemade filter wheel/ slider plans??, Roger Hamlett, 17:10
- Re: Comet Spotted in record time---for me, Florian, 15:58
- Re: Where Get Teflon?, Mark S. Holden, 15:57
- Re: "Deep Impact" mission; designed to deceive?, Bob Schmall, 15:49
- Re: Where Get Teflon?, Florian, 15:46
- Re: WebCams for Planets?, RMOLLISE, 15:38
- Re: Where Get Teflon?, Howard Lester, 14:46
- homemade filter wheel/ slider plans??, Mike Seiberg, 14:01
- Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact", geraldkelleher, 12:16
- Re: C-11 ota weights?, Roger Hamlett, 10:13
- Re: comet?, David Nakamoto, 09:58
- Re: WebCams for Planets?, David Nakamoto, 09:53
- Re: Image of Mercury by Maurizio di Sciullo, David, 09:49
- Where Get Teflon?, W. Watson, 09:27
- Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact", RichA, 09:07
- Re: "Deep Impact" mission; designed to deceive?, RichA, 09:06
- Re: WebCams for Planets?, AFM, 08:20
- comet?, Starlord, 08:02
- Comet Spotted in record time---for me, Doink, 07:57
- Paul Rini Optics, lal_truckee, 07:07
- Re: C-11 ota weights?, Mark D, 05:06
- Re: Eyepieces and barlow for 14 inch f4.8 Newt/Dob, Martin R. Howell, 05:05
- Re: Orion's Stratus Eyepieces, Ken Veto, 04:52
- Re: Eyepieces and barlow for 14 inch f4.8 Newt/Dob, Starlord, 04:50
- Re: Eyepieces and barlow for 14 inch f4.8 Newt/Dob, ., 02:52
- Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact", Chris L Peterson, 02:30
- Re: Observing Book?, Doink, 02:11
- Re: C-11 ota weights?, Mij Adyaw, 02:00
- WebCams for Planets?, Ed T, 01:57
- Re: NYC Events Jul 2005 5/ 6, JOHN PAZMINO, 01:37
- Re: NYC Events Jul 2005 3/ 6, JOHN PAZMINO, 01:37
- Re: NYC Events Jul 2005 1/ 5, JOHN PAZMINO, 01:37
- Re: NYC Events Jul 2005 6/ 6, JOHN PAZMINO, 01:37
- Re: NYC Events Jul 2005 3/ 5, JOHN PAZMINO, 01:37
- Re: NYC Events Jul 2005 4/ 5, JOHN PAZMINO, 01:37
- Re: NYC Events Jul 2005 2/ 5, JOHN PAZMINO, 01:37
- Re: NYC Events Jul 2005 4/ 6, JOHN PAZMINO, 01:37
- Re: NYC Events Jul 2005 5/ 5, JOHN PAZMINO, 01:37
- Re: NYC Events Jul 2005 1/ 6, JOHN PAZMINO, 01:37
- Re: NYC Events Jul 2005 2/ 6, JOHN PAZMINO, 01:37
- Re: Observing Book?, Larry Stedman, 01:21
- Re: Eyepieces and barlow for 14 inch f4.8 Newt/Dob, Starlord, 01:18
- Re: One More Time!, Starlord, 01:15
- Re: Orion's Stratus Eyepieces, Larry Stedman, 01:11
- Re: Observing Book?, Doink, 00:59
- REMINDER: Far from Earth, NASA's Deep Impact spacecraft is about to ..., Sam Wormley, 00:09
- Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact", AstroHoney, 00:08
- Re: Observing Book?, Florian, 00:07
July 02, 2005
- Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact", AstroHoney, 23:55
- Re: C-11 ota weights?, szaki, 23:35
- Re: C-11 ota weights?, Roger Hamlett, 23:05
- Re: "Deep Impact" mission; designed to deceive?, thad, 22:48
- Re: C-11 ota weights?, szaki, 21:34
- Observing Book?, Doink, 21:24
- Re: C-11 ota weights?, Doink, 20:59
- Re: Eyepieces and barlow for 14 inch f4.8 Newt/Dob, ., 20:22
- Re: Deep Impact T-Bone, moonstarer, 20:05
- One More Time!, Starlord, 19:13
- Re: Bad News from Rosamond, Uncle Bob, 19:11
- Re: "Deep Impact" mission; designed to deceive?, Doink, 18:44
- Re: Deep Impact T-Bone, Ike, 16:33
- Re: "Deep Impact" mission; designed to deceive?, geraldkelleher, 14:08
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, Cygnus X-1, 13:40
- solar disk animation, nytecam, 13:11
- Motions that make life possible, geraldkelleher, 12:53
- Re: Eyepieces and barlow for 14 inch f4.8 Newt/Dob, szaki, 10:17
- Re: Back in Operation!, Starlord, 08:02
- astronomy safaris, John Fahey, 07:43
- Re: Back in Operation!, Colin J Denman, 07:36
- Re: Deep Impact T-Bone, pay1439, 06:59
- Re: Back in Operation!, Mark Gingrich, 06:48
- Back in Operation!, Starlord, 06:01
- Re: "Deep Impact" mission; designed to deceive?, Thomas Swanson, 05:44
- Re: Eyepieces and barlow for 14 inch f4.8 Newt/Dob, Martin R. Howell, 04:59
- Re: Eyepieces and barlow for 14 inch f4.8 Newt/Dob, Starlord, 04:52
- Sky & Telescope's News Bulletin - Jul 1, SJG, 04:25
- Re: Orion's Stratus Eyepieces, Ken Veto, 03:45
- Eyepieces and barlow for 14 inch f4.8 Newt/Dob, ., 03:28
- Re: Telescope Field of View Calc?, Paul S. Walsh, 03:04
- Deep Impact T-Bone, ROC, 02:54
- Re: "Deep Impact" mission; designed to deceive?, ROC, 02:49
- Re: Telescope Field of View Calc?, Florian, 02:29
- Re: Telescope Field of View Calc?, -JATO, 01:32
- Re: Telescope Field of View Calc?, Marty, 01:00
- Re: amateur spectrum SN2005cs in M51, Pierre, 00:35
- Re: Update on B8, Jan Owen, 00:18
July 01, 2005
- Telescope Field of View Calc?, RQ, 23:36
- Update on B8, Starlord, 23:24
- Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact", Chris L Peterson, 23:22
- "Deep Impact" mission; designed to deceive?, RichA, 23:15
- Re: Deep Impact Magnitude, Chris L Peterson, 23:09
- Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact", Martin Brown, 22:42
- amateur spectrum SN2005cs in M51, nytecam, 22:33
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, RichA, 22:25
- Re: Deep Impact Magnitude, RichA, 22:23
- Re: Date and UTC Time for Deep Impact?, Mij Adyaw, 22:15
- Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact", RichA, 22:06
- Re: Tempel 1 - How much magnification?, Florian, 21:57
- Re: Deep Impact Magnitude, Robert Sheaffer, 21:15
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, Anti-Collectivist, 21:13
- Re: Tempel 1 - How much magnification?, Ike, 20:47
- Re: Date and UTC Time for Deep Impact?, Ike, 20:43
- Re: Tempel 1 - How much magnification?, Doink, 20:14
- Re: Is this group dying? `~, Stephen Paul, 20:13
- Re: James Gunn Wins International Cosmology Award, Marty, 19:34
- Re: Tempel 1 - How much magnification?, Florian, 19:24
- LPOD site, CLT, 19:23
- Re: Is this group dying? `~, Marty, 19:21
- Tempel 1 - How much magnification?, Mij Adyaw, 18:34
- Re: amateur spectrum SN2005cs in M51, AM, 18:31
- Re: Deep Impact Magnitude, Ike, 18:23
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, geraldkelleher, 18:06
- Re: Starry Night Pro 3.12 and Temple 1?, Mij Adyaw, 17:48
- Re: Missing Astronomy Hat, SkySea@xxxxxxx, 17:47
- Re: best way to increase focal length of new webcam to match old?, Roger Hamlett, 17:32
- Re: best way to increase focal length of new webcam to match old?, Martin Brown, 17:27
- best way to increase focal length of new webcam to match old?, Patrick Candace, 16:45
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, Anti-Collectivist, 16:34
- Re: Supernova 2005cs in M51, nytecam, 16:34
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, Anti-Collectivist, 16:33
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, Chris L Peterson, 15:47
- Re: amateur spectrum SN2005cs in M51, Pierre, 15:37
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, west, 14:00
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, geraldkelleher, 13:39
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, geraldkelleher, 13:07
- Re: accruate "sundials", geraldkelleher, 11:49
- Re: Starry Night Pro 3.12 and Temple 1?, szaki, 09:59
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, Paul Schlyter, 09:43
- Re: Deep Impact Magnitude, Martin Brown, 09:36
- Astronomy Hub - International Astronomy and Space Forum Community, astrohub, 09:30
- Re: Deep Impact Magnitude, David Nakamoto, 07:48
- Rini optics, lal_truckee, 07:12
- Re: Date and UTC Time for Deep Impact?, lal_truckee, 06:49
- Re: Starry Night Pro 3.12 and Temple 1?, Dave Jessie, 06:20
- Re: Starry Night Pro 3.12 and Temple 1?, Mij Adyaw, 06:17
- Re: Starry Night Pro 3.12 and Temple 1?, Dave Jessie, 06:15
- Starry Night Pro 3.12 and Temple 1?, Mij Adyaw, 06:03
- Re: RichA = Troll, AstroHoney, 05:57
- James Gunn Wins International Cosmology Award, Matthew Ota, 05:51
- James Gunn Wins International Cosmology Award, Matthew Ota, 05:51
- Re: RichA = Troll, AstroHoney, 05:44
- Re: Deep Impact Magnitude, Stephen Paul, 04:55
- Re: Image of Mercury by Maurizio di Sciullo, Bill Becker, 04:01
- Re: RichA = Troll, T.T., 03:53
- Re: RichA = Troll, Mij Adyaw, 03:47
- Re: Image of Mercury by Maurizio di Sciullo, Llanzlan Klazmon, 03:36
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, R . P . Bindleswindle, 03:05
- amateur spectrum SN2005cs in M51, nytecam, 03:02
- Re: RichA = Troll, AstroHoney, 02:42
- Re: Best digicam for astropix, Mark S. Holden, 02:06
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, William Hamblen, 01:46
- Re: accruate "sundials", jtaylor, 01:31
- Re: Rosamond, -JATO, 00:48
- Re: Rosamond, -JATO, 00:41
- Re: B-W Optik 30mm UW: HERB, Doink, 00:39
- Re: B-W Optik 30mm UW, Doink, 00:35
- Re: Deep Impact Magnitude, Eric, 00:19
- Re: accruate "sundials", geraldkelleher, 00:01
June 30, 2005
- Re: Deep Impact Magnitude, Bill Tschumy, 23:59
- Re: Date and UTC Time for Deep Impact?, muddy, 23:51
- Re: Date and UTC Time for Deep Impact?, Florian, 23:49
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, geraldkelleher, 23:41
- Re: Deep Impact Magnitude, Morris Jones, 23:24
- Date and UTC Time for Deep Impact?, Mij Adyaw, 23:21
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, geraldkelleher, 23:19
- Re: accruate "sundials", jtaylor, 23:18
- Re: Rosamond, Peter, 23:12
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, geraldkelleher, 23:01
- Re: Deep Impact Magnitude, David Nakamoto, 22:57
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, Martin Brown, 22:55
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, Chris L Peterson, 22:50
- Re: Rosamond, Kevin M. Vernon, 22:44
- Re: Deep Impact Magnitude, AM, 22:43
- Re: Rosamond, AM, 22:38
- Re: Deep Impact Magnitude, Chris L Peterson, 22:31
- Re: Best digicam for astropix, Pierre, 22:30
- Re: Deep Impact Magnitude, Ike, 22:16
- Re: B-W Optik 30mm UW, Herb York, 22:16
- Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact", Ed T, 22:04
- Re: Rosamond, G.T., 22:04
- Re: Deep Impact Magnitude, Stephen Paul, 21:46
- Re: B-W Optik 30mm UW, Ed T, 21:42
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, geraldkelleher, 21:41
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, Jonathan Bartlett, 21:32
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, geraldkelleher, 21:31
- Re: B-W Optik 30mm UW, Doink, 21:31
- Re: B-W Optik 30mm UW, Doink, 21:29
- Re: B-W Optik 30mm UW, MitchAlsup, 21:13
- Re: B-W Optik 30mm UW, Ed T, 21:11
- Re: accruate "sundials", geraldkelleher, 21:09
- Re: Rosamond, RichA, 21:03
- Re: RichA = Troll, RichA, 21:02
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, RichA, 20:48
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, RichA, 20:47
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, RichA, 20:47
- Re: Best digicam for astropix, szaki, 20:42
- Deep Impact Magnitude, Ike, 20:38
- Re: Estimating comet magnitudes - brightness (long), canopus56, 20:32
- Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact", Ike, 20:29
- Re: Field of View Question, CLT, 20:09
- Re: OLD ASTRONOMY BOOKS.... TRADE FOR SHORT TUBE REFRACTOR 3 or 4 inch with EQ mount, AM, 20:08
- Re: Question, CLT, 20:06
- Re: Estimating comet magnitudes - brightness (long), CLT, 20:04
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, David Nakamoto, 20:01
- Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact", Richard F.L.R.Snashall, 20:01
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, David Nakamoto, 19:59
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, David Nakamoto, 19:58
- Re: Rosamond, Peter, 19:57
- Re: Rosamond, Peter, 19:55
- Re: Rosamond, Peter, 19:52
- Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact", RichA, 19:39
- B-W Optik 30mm UW, Doink, 19:38
- Re: Rosamond, Jeff Polston, 19:28
- Re: Supernova 2005cs in M51, Stephen Paul, 19:16
- Re: Rosamond, Wayne Howell, 19:11
- Re: Rosamond, AM, 19:02
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, Brian Tung, 18:57
- Re: RichA = Troll, Mij Adyaw, 18:41
- Re: Rosamond, Starlord, 18:30
- Re: Anyone check out the Celestron CPC scopes yet?, RMOLLISE, 18:13
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, Bill McClain, 18:12
- Re: OLD ASTRONOMY BOOKS.... TRADE FOR SHORT TUBE REFRACTOR 3 or 4 inch with EQ mount, ngc457, 18:06
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, Martin Brown, 18:03
- Re: Supernova 2005cs in M51, David Bishop, 17:56
- Re: accruate "sundials", jtaylor, 17:39
- Re: Best digicam for astropix, Mark S. Holden, 17:35
- Re: Orion's Stratus Eyepieces, jernigam@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:19
- OLD ASTRONOMY BOOKS.... TRADE FOR SHORT TUBE REFRACTOR 3 or 4 inch with EQ mount, The Q, 17:16
- OLD ASTRONOMY BOOKS.... TRADE FOR SHORT TUBE REFRACTOR 3 or 4 inch with EQ mount, The Q, 17:14
- Re: Rosamond, Peter, 17:01
- Best digicam for astropix, Pierre, 16:51
- Supernova 2005cs in M51, Stupendous_Man, 16:28
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, Jonathan Bartlett, 16:10
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, Jonathan Bartlett, 16:06
- Re: Anyone check out the Celestron CPC scopes yet?, RMOLLISE, 13:41
- Newton's comment on the Equation of Time, geraldkelleher, 13:05
- Calendrical reform, geraldkelleher, 11:22
- Re: Image of Mercury by Maurizio di Sciullo, Anthony Ayiomamitis, 10:45
- Re: Image of Mercury by Maurizio di Sciullo, Anthony Ayiomamitis, 10:44
- Re: Vatican helps stargazers look to the heavens, geraldkelleher, 10:44
- Re: Rosamond, Starlord, 10:25
- Re: Vatican helps stargazers look to the heavens, Martin Brown, 10:18
- Re: Rosamond, G.T., 08:34
- Re: Rosamond, Wayne Howell, 08:32
- Vatican helps stargazers look to the heavens, Martin R. Howell, 08:08
- Re: Rosamond, Wayne Howell, 08:06
- Re: Rosamond, T.T., 08:02
- Re: accruate "sundials", geraldkelleher, 07:27
- Re: Rosamond, G.T., 07:11
- Re: Rosamond, Wayne Howell, 07:08
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, Ike, 07:03
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, Ike, 06:59
- Re: RichA = Troll, AstroHoney, 06:58
- Re: Einstein's gravity and SOHO images, Ike, 06:53
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, FAB, 06:27
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, Florian, 05:39
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, Coppy Littlehouse, 04:42
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, Florian, 04:12
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, David Nakamoto, 03:46
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, William Hamblen, 02:24
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, Tom Hise, 02:16
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, Mark Gingrich, 02:11
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, AM, 01:48
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, Florian, 01:43
- Estimating comet magnitudes - brightness (long), canopus56, 01:25
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, RichA, 01:21
- Re: Rosamond, -JATO, 01:05
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, Richard Bullock, 00:58
- Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact, Florian, 00:15
June 29, 2005
- Re: Finder chart, Florian, 23:39
- deep impact - small telescope program, nytecam, 23:34
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, Sam Wormley, 23:32
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, Bill McClain, 23:31
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, Brian Tung, 23:19
- Re: computational amateur astronomy?, Paul Schlyter, 23:14
- Re: Finder chart, thad, 22:55
- Einstein's gravity and SOHO images, nytecam, 22:17
- Re: Image of Mercury by Maurizio di Sciullo, nytecam, 22:13