prune@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Paul Winalski) wrote in
> I disagree.
> Commercial demand for more and more compute power was, and would
> have continued to, drive circuit miniaturization in the absence
> of the space program.
> Did the space program accelerate the development of computer
> circuit miniaturization and thus the development of integrated
> circuits? Very likely. But it would have happened anyway.
But this way, the development was subsidized with tax money.
The government has a way of distorting the "natural" progression of
things by way of tax policy and regulation.
Things that would have happened sooner or later happen sooner. Or
maybe don't get done 'til much later. Or maybe never get done at all
because they're now illegal.
Things that nobody in their right mind would have done get done
anyway because there's a pile of "government money" available.
> On 18 Jul 2005 09:42:11 -0700, MitchAlsup@xxxxxxx wrote:
>>I might refer you to your home office. The computer sitting in
>>there is a cirect result of the technology invented to enable the
>>Apollo program to reach the moon and return safely. You
Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN | bert@xxxxxxxxxxx