sci.astro.amateur
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?

Subject: Re: What does it cost for a newcomer to astronomy?
From: "Mark S. Holden"
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:06:43 -0400
Newsgroups: sci.astro.amateur
Cherokee wrote:
One lesson I've learned from other hobbies is it's a bad idea to spend
too little when entering a new hobby.  The very low end of any hobby
tends to be something I outgrow very quickly.  At that point I buy
something "mid-level'  and regret spending the money on the entry level
product

I've also learned that the low end products of any hobby do not give a
very good representation of the hobby itself.  The low end is usually
flooded with poor quality products.  Such poor quality products lead to
frustration as the newcomer struggles to get it to work right.

Given these two lessons, I'd appreciate a fair estimate of how much a
newcomer in this hobby should set aside to get their first telescope
rig.  What is the ballpark cost to buy a telescope setup that will give
a fair representation of the hobby of astronomy?

peace,
Cherokee


It really depends on your preferences.

I suggest attending a star party or an observing event for a nearby astronomical society and checking out what folks there are using.

Over the years I've owned SCT's, a Dobsonian, and a couple of refractors.

I'm not fond of dobs. To keep an object in view, you need to manually move the scope in two directions at once. Put the same tube on an equatorial mount and you have a newtonian.

A little work to polar align an equatorial mounted scope at the start of the night makes things easier. You can track an object by just moving the scope in one direction. Many include clock drives to do this for you. You can use setting circles to find things.

SCTs are light and compact - but they have a larger central obstruction than a newtonian, and the images just don't seem as crisp. The also tend to have a higher F ratio. This is good for small objects like planets - it's easier to get higher power. But they also give a smaller field of view - and this hurts when you're searching for something. It also seems to take them longer to cool down at the start of the night.

I prefer triplet apochromatic refractors. They have no central obstruction, they tend to come in F ratios that make them reasonably compact, and the image quality is stunning.

Unfortunately, on sale, an 80mm f6 apo tube will run about $1400. Then you'll need to allow money for the mount, a good diagonal, and eyepieces. This could easily put you in the $5000 range.

An apo refractor in the 4.5" range will probably run about $10,000 by the time you're done with accessories if you do everything first class.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>