|
|
On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 10:51:01 -0400, John Steinberg <seesig@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>You're now changing your story. Having just conceded that you wouldn't
>have to sign up "over and over", you're now backpedaling away from your
>own comments.
Okay, sorry. Bad choice of words again. By "signing up" I meant "signing
in". I have a registration that doesn't go away, it is just that they
have a needlessly complex cookie scheme that makes using their site
inconvenient for me.
>> And since there is little in NYT articles that I can't find as easily
>> in publications of higher quality
>
>Since you've provided a plural, please provide the names of at least
>two *newspapers* of higher quality.
[Carefully prefaced with "IMO", and the understanding that I am talking
about national and international reporting, and generally their online
material]
Christian Science Monitor
Los Angeles Times
International Herald Tribune
The London Times
and a couple that you may want to disqualify because they aren't
technically newspapers, although their reporting is similar and you
would be hard-pressed to tell the difference from their online presence,
The Economist
Der Spiegel
And finally, of course
USA Today
|
|