"Eric Stevens" <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 08:06:37 GMT, "IE_Json"
> <inger_e.johansson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >you and I most obviously aren't discussing same painting.
> I thought that was clear from the context of my response to Lloyd
Are you sure Lloyd got that?
> >You are discussing
> >a 19th century painting. I am not. I am discussing a painting from 16th
> Well, I wasn't.
> >There is no way of saying if the top is blown up or not - it's a
> >tower of some kind without enough details due to distance from the
> >the painter used. It's a type of water-color rather than oil and it's
> >page in an diary/annal of one who participated on one of the early
> >The interesting thing is that same shape, but with more details exists on
> >the old drawing that the Danish Marine Officer used relating to Pothurst
> >Pinning's sailing and that the details seem to indicate that the tower
> >have been a mill or a reservoar of some kind.
> >Inger E
> Eric Stevens