Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:45:02 +0100, "Peter Alaca" <p.alaca@xxxxxxxxx>
The investigators apperently saw no reason to
have a closer look.
We don't know that.
So what are you complaining
about? You blame them for not excavating something
you never saw, not even one of those air photos,
something that perhaps not even exists.
This is one occasion where I am prepared to argue from authority. If
Hertz claims to have seen those photographs and Carlson has not denied
that they exist then for the purpose of any rational discussion I am
prepared to accept that the photographs exist and show what Hertz says
they show. Unless of course you know that Hertz has a track record of
making up evidence.
I am talking about you, not about Herz.
You say that Carlson said that Hertz said,
and you blame scientists for not responding