sci.archaeology
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Question re. forged artifacts and documents

Subject: Re: Question re. forged artifacts and documents
From: Matt Giwer
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 06:59:06 -0500
Newsgroups: sci.archaeology, soc.history.medieval
Inger E.(Norah) wrote:
"Matt Giwer" <jull43@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4594f304$0$8921$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Inger E.(Norah) wrote:
"Matt Giwer" <jull43@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4594cab0$0$7714$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
IE_Json wrote:
"Matt Giwer" <jull43@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:45947d0b$0$18148$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
IE_Json wrote:
...
'Something will be found' isn't the same as 'something has been
found'.
Agreed? And that's where my origin question partly is heading.
Then lets get off the dime and get where it is headed.
Matt, please contact me personally for more information. Send it to
1732johansson@xxxxxxxxxx
I only deal in public discourse.
And since I am not allowed to speak of details or sharing photos and
pre-reports in public in the cases I described, that's impossible for the
moment.
What would you give me in private and trust me not to make public? And how dumb
can you get?

While I don't know you in person, I admit that trusting you might be risky.

        Trust with what? Please be specific in your response.

You stand in many cases for things I don't agree to. BUT no matter what I
have heard about you during years, and that's more than I have heard of
most, no one said that you can't be trusted with information.

        I have always used all available information at all times.

How dumb I can get. I am not dumb, but I know which part I send to whom thus
I do have a register to go on if something comes out.

        The answer is still, I only deal with matters in public forums in 
public.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>